kirk5056

Look up the definition of "discrete". It does not mean private, just separate and distinct. Others can still hear you but you are unlikely to hear them. Thr chances of someone being heard by you randomly is less that 0.5%. Of course, they could find your PL filter, enter it into their radio, then call you, and it would be legal in a d**khead kind of way. Lets hope THEY are few on our GMRS.

IMHO a repeater should be used however the owner (the one that used private resources to set it up) allows it to be used. A GMRS repeater is not a public utility, even "open" repeaters. If the repeater owner does not like how it is being used then there are ways of limiting access. If you want a channel where you can contact family (or who ever) then you may want to set up your own channel. There are no private or secure frequencies on GMRS but cleaver use of channel selection and CTCSS/DCS filters can give you a discrete channel to use as you want.

I would rather that NOAA spend their (our) limited (I wish) money on maintaining and upgrading the current system not using that money to buy new and expensive transmitters at every one of their 1,000+ towers.

I believe that FRS/GMRS interoperability is a strong point for both services. I use the same channel for a few groups. Our Jeep group is all GMRS, the deer hunting group has mostly switched to GMRS, but not completely. The group around my cottage (mostly golfcart-golfcart) is mostly FRS. The fact that un-licensed people can legally communicate in each group is a good thing. At my cottage I have the channel NFM on my KG1000, KG905 and KG UV=9GX for the times that I dont use on of my FRS (very old Motorolas), I just have to remember to TX my FCC call sign. If you have a problem with FRS on your channel then use a different channel or different PL filter. If you are scanning all channels with no PL filter so that you will hear everything, then dont be surprised when you DO hear EVERYTHING.

Driving to Moab UT tomorrow, for a week. I thought I would try this sign. They were made by friends, for free. They could not find magnetic sign material on short notice (which I would rather have). I guess I will see if I get any takers.

Did they throw in the MURS frequencies?

In my first rant I defined what I think a Travel Channel should or could be. I discussed how some other radio services handle that concept. In my second rant, I gave my opinion on which of our very limited frequencies should be used for our Travel Channel. In this rant I want to talk about ways to make the GMRS Travel Channel more used and usable. Because if you may make a lot of calls on the GMRS Travel Channel but if no one is there to respond to you then it is not very useful. So, instead of talking about who is making calls and how those calls are made (like most other posts), I want to talk about the people on the other end that may be there to answer you, and maybe suggest ways to increase the number of potential GMRS operators available to respond the calls. THE POTENTIAL LISTENERS I think the listeners out there can be broken into four non-exclusive groups. I think at some time all of us have been in each group, changing groups from time to time, maybe even hour to hour. I know I spent most of my FRS/GRMS time in the first group, but now I move from group to group. 1) NON-LISTENERS: This group does not know that there is/could be a GMRS Travel Channel, nor do they care. They got into FRS/GMRS (like most of us) to solve one or more communication problems. If they positively affected those problems then they stayed with FRS/GMRS. These people have no interest in talking to anyone outside of their group and would (mostly) not be very happy if an outsider started talking on what they think of as their discrete channel. For the most part the people in this group do not know about the GMRS forums and have probably not seen any of the GMRS Youtube videos. I was in this group for 25 years. This is probably the largest of the groups and least likely to be available to respond to your calls. 2) CASUAL LISTENERS: This group has some idea that there is a GMRS Travel Channel (and may be somewhat confused now that there is more than one choice). For this group a GMRS Travel Channel is very much a low priority but do, from time to time, give it a try. This group gets bored or annoyed quickly when there is nothing to hear and even more quickly when there IS something to hear but it is (like CB 19) full of boring or obnoxious talk or worse nothing but poor rx or static whether man made or environmental. So, they tend not to listen for very long and therefore not likely to be there to respond to your calls. 3) AVID LISTENERS: This group is very interested in the GMRS Travel Channel and it may even be the reason they got into GMRS, to contact strangers. These people, at least occasionally, scan all 22 rx frequencies without any PL filters trying to hear everything there is to hear. Ironically, they are the same people that complain when they hear too much, like kids calling their teddy bears or highway flaggers. These people, when they can, will listen to the GMRS Travel Channel all of the time, but this may be the problem in the context of this rant. They probably listen the same way that I listen to my police scanner. My scanner is on all of the time and becomes back ground noise to me. My brain/ears filters out everything until I hear a dispatch alert tone, or back ground siren OR someone’s voice goes up 3 octaves. In other words, this group may miss your Travel Channel call if it does not get by their “ear” filters. 4) MONITORS: This group really wants to monitor the GMRS Travel Channel but does not want to hear chit chat/rag chewing, nor do they want to hear distant tx or environmental static. This is the group that I would like to be a part of most of the time. This group would be very likely to respond to your GMRS Travel Channel call, but not if it was part of a chit chat channel. POSIBLE SOLUTIONS 1) The main thing that we (GMRS users, forums readers and Youtube influencers) can do to recruit potential listeners is for us to encourage manufacturers and retailers to include some mention or maybe instructions on what the Travel Channel is how to use it in their owner’s manuals, advertising and (if we are really lucky) in the pre-programing. This tact should help encourage some listeners from ALL four groups to be actually listening when you make your call. As I am writing this very section I came across the perfect example of this interaction with Manufacturer/retailer. The new (upgrade) Wouxun KG-935G Plus seems to have many bells and whistles recommended by some of our Youtube/forum influencers. Notarubicon even got an LCD display named after him. I believe that he is responsible for many radio features and new GMRS licensees. He was able to get us things on our radios that we didn’t even know we wanted. I really like the stiff channel knob on my KG UV9gx (I didn’t even know it was a thing, I wish I had IT when I was still involved in public safety). Thanks, Randy. I have not always been a big fan of his ideas. I still have a hard time wrapping my brain around his love of the “Roger Beep”. I have been in my deer blind, everyone on the radios were being very low key, then that damn Roger Beep screams out. By the way, “Roger” beep is a misnomer, in the old timey radio world (like military or aviation) “roger” means “I understand”, the beep at the end of your transmission should be called the “over” beep. “Over” means “I am done talking, it is now your turn”. The “Roger Beep” is not the only mis-labeled item that we deal with almost every day. “Private Line” “PL” “Privacy Codes” or any other privacy sounding thing associated with CTCSS/DCS. But like the “Roger Beep”, we have been using them for so long it is hard to use a change to the proper terms. I bring up the KG 935g Plus manual because, like I suggested in the first paragraph of this section, we really need to get the manufacturer/retailers to help us get the word out. It says “Channel 19 (travel channel) is a favorite by default”. However, I have to wonder how the FCC feels about the official manual implying that GMRS Channel 19 is a nation wide frequency, it is not! That line in the manual should be followed by the disclaimer: “unless you are within a certain distance of the Canadian border, at which time in is unlawful to use GMRS Channel 19”. We all can make what ever choice on how much we want to be legal but the Manufactures/retailers should use that disclaimer, in my opinion. Unlike “PL” or “Roger beep” it is not too late to change to the proper term, a true nationwide channel, in my opinion. In a year, maybe less, it may get to be too late to change. Therefore, leaving a small, but significate, number of us without a lawful “Travel Channel”. I am sorry, I get carried away. I am very happy that we have one or more people representing GMRS to the manufacturers/retailers. Please don’t stop. 2) Another thing we can do to encourage more GMRS Travel Channel listeners, if my concept of the who-is-listening groups is even close to being accurate, is to have two “Travel Channels” like aviation and marine radio services. One for Calling/Hailing/distress (in other words, a channel to make initial contact) and one (or more) where the Chit-Chat, Rag Chewing etc (in other words, a channel to have the conversations) can take place. Even public safety, although not a nationwide channel, do a similar thing by having non-dispatch channels (car-to-car, tactical, fireground, records, training etc) to take as much radio traffic off of the dispatch channel, so it is more available for dispatch/emergency traffic. In my groups above, in my opinion, many more people might monitor our main (call/hail/distress) channel if they did not have to listen to unwanted “noise” (whether man-made or environmental), like that sometimes heard on CB 19. Having a two channel “Travel Channel” would put us in line with how aviation and marine radio services handle the concept. But almost ALL radio services, to one extent or another, do the same even at the local level. Railroads have “yard” and “road” channels, marine radios have channels set aside locally to call the marinas, service boats or to open draw bridges and locks. Aviation uses channels locally for tower, ground control, approach/departure etc. And, as I mentioned before, public safety uses alternate channels to help keep the dispatch channels available. I see my idea of two “travel channels” would do that for us, except on a national scale. 3) So how do we do this two channel option with only our 22 rx frequencies to work with? Most of the other radio services have more, sometimes a lot more, frequencies available to them. In reality, as I talked about in a previous rant, we only should consider the 8 high power frequencies and then only the 6 of them are truly available nation wide (the pesky Line A thing). So, instead of using up 2 of our 6 frequencies for one purpose, I suggest using just one frequency but divided into two channels using the modern technology (OK 70+ year old technology) of what I been calling “PL filters”. I know many of you actually hate PL filtering but read on with an open mind. To make my explanation a little less wordy (I know “too late now”) I want to propose labeling for the two channel option. Since our GMRS radio have very limited characters available for labeling I think they should be limited to 6 characters. For the channel used for initial contact I was torn between “CALL” (like many radio services use) and “HAIL” (as in Capt Kirk telling Lt Uhura to “open a hailing frequency” when he wanted to call another ship). I think “CALL” may be inferred as, like in “phone call”, a place for conversation, so I suggest “HAIL”. And I suggest for the longer conversations (rag chew, chit chat) channel that we use “CHAT” instead of “TALK”, for a similar reasons. Then, in case we don’t achieve a full consensus, we add the common FRS/GMRS channel number, shown as “xx”, so as not to reopen the actual frequency debate. So we would have “xxHAIL” and “xxCHAT”. If my two channel option does not take hold then we could have “xxTRAV” and pronounce it as “number travel” (ie “nineteen travel”). I suggest the xxHAIL channel use PL to filter out the xxCHAT noise (voice or static). It seems that PL 141.3 is well accepted as the travel PL filter, so we could continue that. It is also the legacy PL filter used when we actually had a more official Travel Channel. Then I suggest that xxCHAT have no PL filter and therefore be able to hear all traffic using that frequency within range, INCLUDING xxHAIL traffic. If you are mostly into the social part of radio or if you really dislike PL filters so much then you could probably stay on xxCHAT and be very happy. From a listener stand point it would seem that xxCHAT might be the channel to listen to, but “some people” do not want to listen to the noise but do want to hear any initial contact calls. From a caller stand point why would they use xxHAIL? Because, using xxHAIL for the call it is heard by people on both channels, filtered and unfiltered. Therefore increasing the number of potential listeners. If no response to the xxHAIL call is received after a few attempts you could switch to xxCHAT in case someone did hear you but has a radio that can not change from PL unfiltered to filtered easily. Once initial contact is made, both users could go to an agreed upon channel for the longer conversations, xxCHAT would be the default but it could be any channel they have programed in common. Very short exchanges and distress calls could stay on xxHAIL. It should be noted that most other radio services lose the ability to hear the hailing channel when they switch to the conversation channel, but using this structure, we would not. POSIBLE NEGATIVES 1) As mentioned above, some radios, mostly “bubble pack” and some Midlands can not program frequencies with more that one PL filter. Changing the PL filter from “none” to 141.3 can be done on most of these radios, but probably will not be. For these users they can decide (if the information is available to them) which channel (filtered or unfiltered) would meet their needs the best. I can see pros and cons to each in this case. 2) How does this Travel Channel structure affect repeaters? Since repeater input frequencies are in the 467.xxx range then input would not be affected. On the repeater out put side the repeater owners could decide which group they want to hear their channel. If they see themselves as oriented toward the traveler then they may choose no PL filter or PL 141.3 so they can be heard by radios on the simplex Travel Channels. If, on the other hand, they see themselves available to traveler but do not want to compete with the simplex Travel Channel users they could use any PL filter other than “none” or 141.3. In most areas I do not see much problem with simplex and repeaters sharing the same channel. CONCLUSION If you got into FRS/GMRS for emergency communications you may be disappointed. Unless you know before your emergency who and how to call others you will probably not be able to call anyone. Ham is a better option but your cell phone or a satellite distress device would be a much better option. GMRS could be used to help rescuers find you once the initial distress call is received. OR FRS/GMRS could be a poor, but available last chance. If you got into FRS/GMRS to meet and talk to strangers you may be disappointed. Ham is a much better option most of the time. In fact, Ham is much better at most things “radio”. They are great at innovation, radio science, radio etiquette. GMRS is not “ham lite” and I hope my proposals here does not turn us into ham lite. I think having a small part of our radio service used for this would make our radio service more valuable and our radios more valuable, but it is not what GMRS does best. In my ¼ century on FRS/GMRS I have talked to exactly one stranger and I have talked one exactly one GMRS repeater, both were in the same conversation. I really have no plans to contact strangers. Although we are caravanning to Moab, UT next September, I may give it a try during the boring times. I only started this discussion because the topic comes up so often on the forums and “the Youtube”. If we are able to get a consensus on a national frequency, with the two channel options we would, in effect, have channels similar to public safety dispatch and tactical options. I, for one, would use the channel this way. I would make xxHAIL my stan dby channel, both at home and in my vehicles hoping to be contacted by strangers AND members of my GMRS groups. My hope in taking this very long look at the GMRS Travel Channel I can get everyone, especially the GMRS Travel Channel Committee and other influencers, to revisit the idea and make best decision for our radio service. These ideas are MY opinion and I do not wish to argue my opinions. If you think that I am wrong, then I probably am. I know my writing style is, at best, convoluted and disjointed, so if you want me to clarify a point or two I will. I offer these ideas as a way to get discussion and conversation started. I am not the final word on this. In fact if you think I wrote this to prove how smart I am, I suggest you read it again and you see how little I actually know. So, as Mike Myers, in his “Coffee Talk” sketches on Saturday Night Live (back when SNL was actually funny) would say: “TALK AMONGST YOURSELVES”

When we choose a GMRS Travel Channel what are some of the criteria we should consider? I have thought of a few, I am sure there are more. When I refer to GMRS I also mean FRS unless noted. This is my second rant of three on the GMRS Travel Channel. In my first rant (yesterday) I gave my thoughts on what a Travel Channel is and how some other radio services have handled the concept. To review, I suggested that a Travel Channel is made up of three components, a Call/Hail component, a Chat/Rag chew component and a Distress component. And we saw that some radio services have all three components on one channel, some have each with a channel alone and some combined them on two channels. These are my thoughts on the criteria, you may disagree. CRITERION: HIGHEST TX POWER It seems to me that we should choose from the highest allowed power channels (GMRS 15-22). This gives the prospective caller the most choices for TX power. CRITERION: BE LIKE CB Since many come to GMRS from CB those people may be expecting GMRS 19 to be like CB 19. Those coming from public safety, military, ham, aviation or marine may not have those same pre-conceived notions. I am not sure that nostalgia should be an important criterion. CRITERION: FCC LINE A There is an international agreement (signed in 1965, so it is nothing new) between the US and Canada that restricts the use of certain frequencies within a certain distance of the Canadian border. The FCC calls this Line A. For GMRS that means we cannot use GMRS 19 and GMRS 21 in those areas. I cannot find any documentation to show why those only GMRS frequencies and not other GMRS channels. Now, only effecting areas near Canada may not seem like much of the US but a look at the FCC website map shows something else. Looking at the FCC map it appears that GMRS 19 & 21 cannot be used in some major metropolitan areas like Seattle and Everett Washington. Nor can they be used in the major metro areas of Detroit, Ann Arbor, Lansing, Flint and Saginaw Michigan. They cannot be used in the metro areas around Cleveland and Toledo Ohio. Also, cannot be used around Buffalo, Syracuse and Rochester New York. Nor can they be used in about 20-30% of Vermont and New Hampshire. And others Also, looking at FCC’s map it appears that GMRS 19 & 21 cannot be used in about 80% of the State of Maine and about 60% of the State of Michigan-with their major adventuring areas. Speaking of adventuring areas, GMRS 19 & 21 cannot be used in New York’s Adirondack Mts or 4 of Michigan’s 5 National Forests. They also cannot be used on 4 of the 5 Great Lakes. They cannot be used in the Boundary Waters canoe area and the rest of the Superior National Forest. They cannot be used in several Indian Reservations nor in Glacier National Park. GMRS 19 & 21 cannot be used in several of Washington State’s National forests, most of Puget Sound and all of Olympic National Park. Nor can GMRS 19 & 21 be used at about 10% of the NFL stadium tailgate parties or about the same percentage of MLB stadiums. I almost forgot, there is also an FCC Line C. It seems to prohibit the use on GMRS 19 & 21 in and around the Alaska capitol of Juneau. They cannot be used in any of the Alaska panhandle and the associated waters, so popular in the adventuring and cruise industries. They are also prohibited from use in several National preserves, the Wrangell-St Elias National Park and most (if not all) of the US part of the Alaska Highway. CRITERION: COMMONLY KNOWN There is a channel that seems to be, by some GMRS operators, to already be the GMRS Travel Channel. The GMRS Travel Channel debate/discussion comes up frequently on the GMRS forums that I read. When it does some people always point out that GMRS 20 is, or at least was, the unofficial Travel Channel. I am sure many, like me, don’t post but also think this to be true. This shows at least some common agreement on the topic already existed. A google search also shows some references. It is listed on the 333 Radio Plan and even the flyer that comes with the Wouxun KG-UV9g PRO and KG-UV9gx from Better Safe Radio labels GMRS 20 (PL 141.3) as the Travel Channel. My un-scientific review of the repeaters listed on this site it appears that many, if not most, repeaters that claim to be a “Travel Repeater” are on repeater channel 20 (rx 462.670, tx 467.670). CRITERION: MOST IMPORTANT The last criterion, that I can think of, and the most important one, is a nod to, and paraphrase of, Spinal Tap’s Nigel Tufnel. If Nigel was discussing the GMRS Travel Channel debate he undoubtedly would say that GMRS 20 IS one better than GMRS 19. Case closed. ? CONCLUSION We are a relatively new radio service so we could have picked any of our 22 rx frequencies. A look at my criteria above seems to me to make one frequency a little more desirable then the others. But choosing one of the two frequencies prohibited for use in a small but significant part of the country seems like a weak choice. “Some people” may disagree. Before the GMRS Travel Channel Committee gave us it’s decision we had two groups. One group had no idea that there was a Travel Channel and another group that thought it might be, or could be, or maybe was GMRS 20. So, to end the confusion between these two groups the GMRS Travel Channel Committee gave us a third group, the GMRS 19 group. Instead of picking one of the existing groups. I believe that the GMRS Travel Channel “Committee” included one of the most influential, well thought of and entertaining people in the GMRS universe. I agree with the “Committee’s” basic premise (someone just has to make a decision) but (mostly because of the FCC’s Lines A & C) I think the “Committee” was in error with it’s choice of GMRS 19. A similar GMRS “committee” recently declared GMRS 16 as the 4x4 channel using the same “has to” idea. That “committee” pointed out that in math 4 X 4 = 16 so GMRS 16 was the logical choice—THIS WAS INSPIRED. I was considering making the GMRS Travel Channel my stand-by channel so that strangers AND friends can find me, while I am still able to monitor the Travel Channel. But, even though I live on the good side of Line A, a lot of my travels and most of my adventuring takes place on the wrong side of Line A so I cannot use GMRS19 as my stand-by at this time. But this is NOT reason for my rants. Please read my next rant where I propose structuring our GMRS Travel Channel (regardless of frequency) in such a way that might encourage more use of it.

What is a radio “Travel Channel” and how do other radio services use the concept? These are my thoughts. I am not an expert, I am not a ham (sad or otherwise) but I might be “some people”. Some of you will disagree with my thoughts, some will point out that I am wrong on some issues (I invite that, my goal is to raise the knowledge base of GMRS operators not pretend to know it all). I may leave out important things, I don’t do it on purpose. When I refer to GMRS I also mean FRS unless I say otherwise since they both share the same frequencies. In my un-scientific review of the GMRS forums (that I know of) the three main recurring topics are: 1) I bought my new GMRS radio and now no one will talk to me or I don’t hear anyone talking. 2) I turn off my PL filters to scan GMRS so that I can hear EVERYTHING on those channels and now I am hearing too much (kids, highway flaggers or businesses) so I want them to stop using the channels. 3) Is there a GMRS Travel Channel (or road channel or calling/hailing channel)? I think GMRS was designed to solve particular communication issues among small groups of people that already know each other. But, I think finding an answer to Topic 3, a well thought out, commonly recognized national Travel Channel, could act like a magnet: drawing in people that WANT to be heard by strangers and repelling those that do not. But first I need to give my definition of some terms (that some will disagree with). TRAVEL CHANNEL I see a travel channel is comprised of three components. CALLING/HAILING The first is the most obvious and that is the channel used to call, hail, make initial contact with strangers. This could be to call that Jeep that just crossed the trail or contact a local for information. This includes those that hope a stranger will call, so they listen on this channel. CHAT/RAG CHEW CHANNEL You may think that this should be the same channel as above but you will see that some other radios services separate them. This is where information is passed, conversations take place and stories told. On CB 19 I think of it as just noise. DISTRESS CHANNEL This is the channel that could be used to call for rescue or more likely (due to GMRS short ranges) a channel to help rescuers zero in on the person in distress. I think that is what the Wyoming 307 radio plan is all about, assisting rescuers find the caller, not making the initial distress call. We will see that some of the other radio services have these 3 components on one channel, some have each on its own channel and some use a combination. CHANNEL What makes a channel different from a frequency? Some people confuse frequency and channel. Some confuse the radio or programing software memory location as channel. My definition of a “channel” is a combination of frequency, PL filter and a label. I know much more goes into a channel (TX power, band width etc) but for this rant it is all I will use. FREQUENCY Two-way channels have 2 frequencies (RX/TX- sometimes the same, some with an off set). Monitor-only channels have 1, but I will refer to frequency as singular most of the time. PL FILTER I am talking about CTCSS/DCS codes but I am using “PL” for short hand (get over it). I am calling them “filters” and not “codes” because filter is actually closer to how they work. LABEL Giving a frequency a label is what, in my mind, really makes it a channel. Most newer GMRS radios allow some type of label on a screen, even bubble pack radios have a label (618 is a label). Some labels are just common knowledge (CB 19, marine band channels), some are labeled on flight/mission plans, or on harbor or airport maps/charts, or just on a slip of paper Scotch taped to the radio or mic (that is how we did it early in my public safety career). When frequency is combined with PL filters our 30 (22/8) frequencies can become over 3,000 discrete channels, so assigning a label becomes very import when referring to any one of them. “Discrete” is used here according to Merriam-Webster dictionary meaning of: “constituting a separate entry: individually distinct”. NOT PRIVATE and certainly NOT SECURE. Just meaning a channel where you may not be bothered by unwanted noise and transmissions, most of the time. RADIO SERVICES CELL PHONE While not technically a radio “service” they do use radio waves. For this rant cell phones suck as a call/hail device to reach strangers. Once contact is made there is nothing better for chat. IF you have cell service there is no better way to call for help. 911 works almost everywhere and you can “stay on the line” to zero in the help. SATELLITE PHONE This is similar to cell phone with better coverage. But expensive. SATELLITE DISTRESS DEVICES (inReach, Spot etc) Also not really a radio service but does use radio. These are totally worthless for contacting strangers (or even friends) around you. They are very limited for chat, usually only text with pre-arranged computer equipped people. But they seem to be very good at calling for help (I must admit very little personal knowledge). I plan to buy one for my next out west adventure. MILITARY The military does not seem to have any national or generally recognized call/hail pre-set channels or distress pre-set channels. They do have those channels but they are geographic or mission designated. RAILROAD The railroads have many frequencies, both analog and digital, and they seem to be shared by all of the companies. But any call/hail or distress pre-set channels seem to be geographic, route specific or company specific. BUSNESS RADIOS On the business radio service frequencies are usually allocated by license to geographic areas. Communication between businesses is rare without a new license allowing it. So any call/hail or distress channels are within each license. Businesses make up their own labels. PUBLIC SAFETY Like business radios public safety is limited to local or regional licenses. Some states have statewide licenses for interop or mutual aid. For public safety I am using “channel” as interchangeable with trunked “talk groups”. At one time 155.370 was common but rarely used now. I do hear it being used in northern Indiana still. Most agencies use their dispatch channel for calling/distress and have Tac or car-to-car discrete channels for longer or more detailed info. So, there is not a real national pre-set channel. BUT since 9-11, National Interoperability Field Operations Guide (NIFOG) has been developed. NIFOG has discrete channels on VHF lo, VHF hi, UHF and 700 and 800. On each of those bands there is a call discrete channel with 2-8 associated “Tac” channels, I assume, for more chat type traffic. NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER (NIFC) This is sort of a subset of public safety but also uses aviation channels. NIFC has many labeled discrete channels but they are incident assigned not really a general use group. CB (Citizens band) CB has both Call/Hail and Chat/Ragchew on the same channel (CB 19) and has its distress channel on another (CB 9). I know some people change channels to chat but not enough for me. I find it hard to listen to CB 19 due to the noise and language. BUT there is no better source of real time information in a traffic jam/situation. I have a $800 police scanner on my dash but when I come upon a traffic problem I go to CB 19. No where else can I get real-time info on which lane to use, what is actually happening and maybe even an alternate route. MURS These lonely little frequencies stuck in the middle of the business band are rarely used and don’t really have any discrete channel labels other than each business user. But MURS 3 (third when listed numerically) is listed on the 333 Radio Plan (SHTF) as are channels from many of the radio services including ours. I have seen this 333 Radio Plan dismissed or mischaracterized as having to do with something called the 3 percenters? The threes actually come from the plan, during SHTF, to turn on your radio at the top of each third hour, for three minutes on your radio’s channel 3. It seems like it is worth knowing about. They list our “travel channel” GMRS 20 with 141.3 PL filter and FRS 3 and GMRS 17. In fact, threes are use a lot in wilderness survival, SAR and prepping. One use is the survival “Rule of 3”: you can live 3 minutes with out air, 3 hours without shelter (could be as little as a hat/gloves or a tent), 3 days without water and 3 weeks without food. Threes also show up in emergency signaling. The mother of all emergency signals is SOS, which is just a series 3 dots and 3 dashes (I have no idea of the order so if I had to use it I would just dot-dot-dot, dash-dash-dash, dot-dot-dot, dash-dash-dash, dot-dot-dot until someone figures it out). Also, with a lamp or mirror you should flash three times, there is three horn, whistle, gunshots. Three bon fires, three colored panels on the ground, three pyramids and on and on. I know none of this has anything to do with radio services but next time you are out adventuring and detect a series of three anythings, you may want to investigate. I am not suggesting that we (GMRS) adopt this but we should be aware. HAM Ham operators are by far the most knowledgeable, professional and educated about radio operations, science and devices. I come from public safety where we, as a group, have no idea how radios work, or why. We just push the button and talk. Ham does have some discrete channels labeled for calling and they seem to then rag chew on that same channel. Hams are boring to listen to. In disasters and disaster planning they set up some very good distress channels but they are don’t seem to be nationally recognized. AVIATION This service, along with marine, has the best Call/Hail, Chat and Distress channels, in my opinion. Hailing is done on one of two discrete channels. They call them UHF Guard and VHF Guard (or Military Guard and Civilian Guard). I believe that aircraft are required to monitor one of these channels. You will recognize these channels as the ones used in movies and TV when a fighter jet comes up to a civilian aircraft and orders it to land or tries to wake up the pilot. This and distress calls are all that is allowed on these 2 channels. I have heard plane-to-plane directing the plane being called to change to another frequency. There are a few listed as air-air (fixed wing and helo). Mayday calls can be made on these guard channels and (maybe more frequently) on local tower channels or regional center channels. By the way Mayday calls are also given in threes. Mayday is something we can consider but it can ONLY be used when life or craft are in danger. On aviation and marine radios, PanPan repeated three times, is used for non-threat to life or craft emergencies. Mayday is now being used by some fire departments. MARINE This service is, in my opinion, the best at handling the Travel Channel issue as I have defined it. No traffic is allowed on the discrete hail channel except for hailing and distress. You cannot even do radio checks on this channel. AND it is enforced by the US Coast Guard. Vessels are required to “set a radio watch” on this channel. This leaves this channel available for destress calls. They have boat-to-boat and bridge-to-bridge (navigation bridge, not road bridge) discrete channels labeled. CONCLUSION Why is any of this important? Well, if we are going to have a “Travel Channel” it should be with the knowledge of how others before us have handled the concept. We (GMRS) are probably the newest radio service and as such we can learn from earlier mistakes and successes. No need to re-invent the wheel or use an imperfect wheel. I know the un-official GMRS Travel Channel Committee has met. And while I disagree with the Committee’s findings I whole heartedly agree with the beginning premise. That is SOMEONE HAS TO TAKE THE BULL BY THE HORN AND JUST DECLARE A TRAVEL CHANNEL. I am just hoping, after I present more ideas in my next 2 rants that the Committee might reconsider.

IMHO most of the recent upgrades in GMRS has been more because of our youtube/forum influencers than any FCC action. I upgraded to the KG-UV9gx and found everything I loved in the pro model and the upgrades were GREAT.

It seems to me that Ham licenses are personal licenses and GMRS are group licenses (whole families) so using ham as a guide line is not really applicable. When I was in public safety (group licenses) each user/radio did not use the FCC call sign. FCC call signs were given (sub-audible) automatically or by the dispatchers. That seems to be more applicable to GMRS.

I agree that the FCC talks about "stations" but I see no station licenses. I would read that to mean that the PERSON'S ID is also IDing which ever radio (or radios in repeater mode) that person is operating. When I do range testing on several radios I do not re-ID with each radio I use. I announce my ID once per frequency then move around the radios I am testing. But I am not an expert.....

I am not a expert but..... It seems to me that the FCC ID belongs to the person not the radio. So if the person TXing IDs then the ID requirement is met. So regardless of how many individual radios the TX goes through as long as that person IDs the should satisfy the requirement.

I would like to see more usernames and fewer call signs. For continuity I can not remember who wrote what when it is call signs (not my memory type).

Or we could go back to using Channel 20!

Some of what you are warning about is true but rare. FM capture requires proximity and over-talking current other-PL traffic is very rare requiring both proximity AND simultaneous TXing. MOST of the time you will hear no non-group traffic and not bother any other groups, if they also are using PL filters.

If you are trying to hear everything on the GMRS frequencies then dont be surprised when you DO hear everything on the GMRS frequencies. IMHO the beauty of GMRS is the you and your group can set up your own CHANNEL by picking a frequency, adding a PL filter and greatly decreasing the chance of hearing others while meeting your comm needs. There is NO privacy ("they" can still hear you) but you can miss the other stuff most of the time.

Full re-set did not change the delay. Email sent to Better Safe Radio. Thanks

I have the Wouxun KG UV9g and I have noticed at power on it takes 10-25 seconds before I hear any transmissions. Is this normal? The delay is there regardless of PL filters, VOX off, keys locked or unlocked, priority on or off, back light on or off. There is a delay with the continuous NOAA WX channels. There is NO delay on the commercial FM radio, but is does take a few seconds to tune in a station. And there is not a delay on TX, but I can not hear a response until the 10-25 second delay is over. The delay is there regardless of whether is is a cold power up, or a "warmed up" re-power up. Any ideas?

I thought I understood this, but I guess not. I want to put a 1/2 wave whip on my Jeep window frame NMO mount (no ground plane). A ham friend gave me a 1/4 wave VHF antenna that I thought I could just cut down to 1/2 wave UHF. As I cut I get no meaningful changes on the SWR meter. I DO get a 1.05 SWR using a Midland "ghost" antenna but I dont know how much it will need for a ground plane. I was hoping to cut down the new antenna and do a range test with the ghost. Does SWR only work on 1/4 wave or does the reading translate to 1/2 wave?

I have a hard time listening to CB (especially 19) because of the noise and language. BUT when I encounter a traffic problem there is no better source of real time information on what is happening, which lane to be in, or how the find an alternate route. And I have a $700 police scanner on my dash!

Once upon a time--someone made a FRS radio with the actual radio inside the softball sized mag mount antenna and controls on a remote mic. I owned one and it was, at best, cumbersome. But it did work.

I disagree with the assumption that PL filters "reduces your ability to successfully make contact". If I lived in an area that had a distress channel I would dedicate a radio to that channel, but only if there was a PL filter so I would not have to listen to kids calling their teddy bear. If my dedicated radio made ANY noise (with the filter in place) then I would have a high likely hood of it being an actual distress call.

Keep 20! Every time this topic comes up many people cite 20 as THE travel channel all ready. Why reinvent the wheel. If we keep PL filter of 141.3 then few will even hear the channel unless they choose to. I would rather have a few choosing to MONITOR the channel then a lot of people randomly LISTENING to it (and trying to use their ears to filter out non-travel traffic). If you think simplex Travel channel users will bother your repeater then use a different out put PL filter, they are not using your input freq. BTW I live in Michigan, if we go with 19 then I cant use it in most of my state. I like the idea of just declaring channel 20 the "hailing/distress channel" it might be working for the "off road channel" (which I really like).

I dont pretend to understand FCC rules (not laws ) but I do have an occasional grasp on common sense. I cant see how anyone could be held accountable for content on their repeater unless they monitored it 24/7, with a 5 second delay AND a kill button. It seems to me that just following the ID rules (at start, 15 minutes, at end) on either simplex or repeater is the way responsibility is assigned.