Jump to content

Is it legal to record transmissions(GMRS) for possible violation?


ULTRA2

Recommended Posts

This question is just for information only.

 

I think the answer is no due to privacy but i have a individual here locally keeps keying up the repeater but says nothing just trying to find out the legality of recording.

Most police, fire, EMS, local government agencies record all of their radio traffic. So do many businesses. Absent encryption (not legal on GMRS anyway), there is no expectation of privacy on two-way radio traffic; cell phone frequencies excepted.

 

I'm not sure what value recording silent transmissions might be, but only you can decide that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most police, fire, EMS, local government agencies record all of their radio traffic. So do many businesses. Absent encryption (not legal on GMRS anyway), there is no expectation of privacy on two-way radio traffic; cell phone frequencies excepted.

 

I'm not sure what value recording silent transmissions might be, but only you can decide that.

 

Very good response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can listen to, and record any open, in-the-clear radio transmissions you would like, (except cellular phone and encrypted comms) and you may forward the recordings along with other documentation as evidence of violations to authorities.

 

If you are a repeater owner or trustee, then record away, it is your system to control. 

...and keep very good logs and notes, including time and date of alleged violations, and any triangulation or location info you have.

 

Make sure you have facts. Just saying "I think Billy is kerchunking my machine." will get you no where.

 

Also... one thing I have done on one my Ham machines to eliminate kerchunkers is to have ZERO hang time, and no "courtesy tone" or "Roger Beep".  The repeater works, but if they chunk-chunk-chunk it and don't hear the "tail", they assume it isn't working, or that they do not have the correct tone, and they leave.  If they key up and ID themselves, then I will answer.  I inform them about the machine having no hang time, and no beeps and boops.  I tell them it is like a "religious" repeater: they just need to have faith that it is working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Illegal to record traffic on your repeater its actually a good idea. You never know what may occur. As for keying up repeaters to see if it is accessible, I don't have a problem with it. Just when the keying gets way out of hand like keying to agitate everyone, that is when it becomes a problem. There was a software called rf ID alot of repeater amateur radio owners used, that was good. It gives u the ability to ID the keyer or chunker on the input side, and with a sufficient yagi helps you find the direction its coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Illegal to record traffic on your repeater its actually a good idea. You never know what may occur. As for keying up repeaters to see if it is accessible, I don't have a problem with it. Just when the keying gets way out of hand like keying to agitate everyone, that is when it becomes a problem. There was a software called rf ID alot of repeater amateur radio owners used, that was good. It gives u the ability to ID the keyer or chunker on the input side, and with a sufficient yagi helps you find the direction its coming from.

@Kevsh Thanks for the information but i am not the repeater owner i am just a user on that repeater, however i don't think this individual was checking to see if the repeater is in use.

 

The reason i say that is because the person keys up while i am in a qso with another station and the station as it was weak into the repeater.

 

Apprently whoever this person is is just trying to get attention but not while a conversation is going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Since you are not the repeater owner, there is little you can do beyond complaining to the owner. If the perp is a typical 'kerchunker', there is only a momentary disruption, no real harm done (even though it is a rule violation). Unless you can devote the time and resources to positively identify the offender, the chances of an FCC response is virtually nil.

 

If, however, they are transmitting for a long period, that constitutes intentional interference which the FCC may be interested in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.