I am also look forward to winter around here, not because I like cold, but because the leaves will be off the trees and I am really curious to see how range improves in the absence of the leaves.
That would be an interesting test. I often read where VHF tends to reach further because at the lower frequency the RF is absorbed less by tree leaves etc. I'm not so sure that's the main reason. There is another one that could explain it more called "free space path loss" which has nothing to do with signal absorption or blockages.
https://en.wikipedia...space_path_loss
http://www.sis.pitt....Fall16/lec5.pdf
What it comes down to is the signal strength is expressed in "volts per meter" and is independent of frequency but related to transmitter power.
"http://www.bccdc.ca/...ents/Guidelines and Forms/Guidelines and Manuals/EH/EH/Section2Final06062013.pdf"
However since one has to use a resonate antenna, or nearly so, the antenna on UHF is roughly 1/3 the "length" of the same type at VHF and thus intercepts just 1/3 of the signal expressed in "volts per meter". Thus the received signal is 1/3 the amplitude, voltage wise, coming out of the antenna. From a power stand point the received signal "power" is proportional to the square of the voltage thus the "power" at UHF would be about 1/9 that at VHF, or in db's, 10*log(1/9), its 9.54db lower.
https://www.allabout...oss-calculator/
Using the above calculator the path loss is 75.962db with the following data input:
Distance: 1 KM
Frequency: 150 MHz
Transmitter Gain: 0
Receiver Gain: 0
And you get a path loss of 85.504db with the following data input:
Distance: 1 KM
Frequency: 450 MHz
Transmitter Gain: 0
Receiver Gain: 0
The difference is. 9.542db lower as expected on UHF compared to VHF for the two frequencies used. The higher the calculated number is in db the higher the loss.