commsprepper Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 Does anyone currently make a Part 95 certified repeater (with the exception of Ritron)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 n4gix Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 BridgeCom Systems BC-40DU Logan5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 amphibian Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 Kenwood, Icom, Motorola, Midland Johnson....and several others do and have for several years now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 commsprepper Posted February 24, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Spoke with BridgeCom Systems and was advised theirs are only Part 90. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 zap Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 BridgeCom Systems BC-40DUSame repeater IIRC as the Ritron. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WQYC236 Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 In a perfect world some boy genius would market a repeater package with the bugs already worked out. IMO the "perfect" repeater for many GMRS applications would be a weather resistant package consisting of the repeater and hardware hooked directly to an antenna with a short lead and a water proof AC power cord. It would be designed in such a way that it could easily be hoisted to the top of a 100 ft tree or mounted on a tower with the power cord trailing behind. No line losses to worry about but the equipment would need to be of a rugged design that can thrive in an outdoor shelter with no heat or cooling. The light weight exterior would be water proof but allow air flow for cooling. I've seen transceivers build into water proof packages with additional instrumentation and speakers, why not the whole repeater assembly? I'll bet that if someone builds it, they will come. pantherpaw9 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Logan5 Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 When code approved of my 55' tower, since the FAA required no light for it height, They said no residential 110v AC power could be affixed directly to the tower. Power for rotor is 24v and other devices use 12v. Unless you use a mobile duplexer, and a small repeater, it would be a large box. Not sure a 100' cord is a good idea. I do like the idea of eliminating so much feedline but it is more complicated as always. My current Hoffman enclosure is 24X24X18, I wonder what the wind loading would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WQYC236 Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 When code approved of my 55' tower, since the FAA required no light for it height, They said no residential 110v AC power could be affixed directly to the tower. Power for rotor is 24v and other devices use 12v. Unless you use a mobile duplexer, and a small repeater, it would be a large box. Not sure a 100' cord is a good idea. I do like the idea of eliminating so much feedline but it is more complicated as always. My current Hoffman enclosure is 24X24X18, I wonder what the wind loading would be.Nothing is ever easy when it comes to actually doing it. Maybe the concept would lend itself to a low powered solar application. I've talked 17 miles from a mountain top with only 4 watts. Logan5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WQYC236 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 When code approved of my 55' tower, since the FAA required no light for it height, They said no residential 110v AC power could be affixed directly to the tower. Power for rotor is 24v and other devices use 12v. Unless you use a mobile duplexer, and a small repeater, it would be a large box. Not sure a 100' cord is a good idea. I do like the idea of eliminating so much feedline but it is more complicated as always. My current Hoffman enclosure is 24X24X18, I wonder what the wind loading would be.Was just re-reading your post, what is "my code"? Is that a neighborhood thing? We don't have any restrictions on towers unless they get into airplane territory out my way. mainehazmt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Logan5 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 I have not doubt of that, when I hook my 4watt HT to my feedline, I easily get 15 plus miles. Height truly is King.. I think it could be done with a lot of forethought. I have deployed Cameras and DD-wrt routers like this. I have a collection of other enclosures none of them big enough for anything above a Parrot or two uv5r's and a rick. If you have 100' tower, try 2 HT's with a controller and separate antennas, at 4 watts and no duplexer, should fit in a standard demarcation box, I bet you get good propagation. Now you got me thinking of some testing of my own. hmmm... mainehazmt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Logan5 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 Had to have code approval with the city. but Our local Ham club made it easier, still took 6 months. glad to have it over and only one neighbor complained and she is across the lagoon and in the garden club to which I also belong. She said "Were not thrilled about it" referring to her and her husband. I am digging thru my junk trying to find two old HT's for a simple tower mount two antenna repeater. at only 4 watts how important is antenna separation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WQYC236 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 Had to have code approval with the city. but Our local Ham club made it easier, still took 6 months. glad to have it over and only one neighbor complained and she is across the lagoon and in the garden club to which I also belong. She said "Were not thrilled about it" referring to her and her husband. I am digging thru my junk trying to find two old HT's for a simple tower mount two antenna repeater. at only 4 watts how important is antenna separation?If the distance between the antennas was a multiple of a wave length wouldn't you experience some gain? If we could work out the bugs it might be marketable as a package. I don't have a 100 foot tower yet but I do have two 100 foot trees (still working on how to climb them safely or launch a line to pull up a rope). My understanding of how to make a HT into a repeater is woefully lacking. I'd still like to find a way to turn my Motorola base station into something that I can ping or that would parrot back my voice for testing purposes since I'm usually working alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Logan5 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 If I had a 100' tree, I wouldn't have spent so much money mainehazmt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WQYC236 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 If I had a 100' tree, I wouldn't have spent so much moneyI know that feeling! One of the problems is that the closest tree (an oak) is about 70 ft. horizontal and 100 ft. vertical from where my radio is located. Even calculating the side 'c' of the triangle (122 ft) that's a fair amount of line loss. That's why I think putting the repeater and antenna together in the tree makes some sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 zap Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 It's doable. Right now you'd need a Maxon data radio with external sink for the transmit side and either another for receiver or a hamtronics receiver (about the best receiver that can practically be purchased right now). 30 ft of vertical separation and CAT5e to provide PTT, audio and COR as well as power (you'd want 24 or 48V for all intents and purposes). Still looking at $600 cost if the Maxon's were type accepted for GMRS. Add the cost of a duplexer and subtract the extra antenna and combine enclosures, you'd have a decent TTR. That's what it would cost with current tech in a reliable package though. In retrospective, Motorola sells a P25 tactical repeater (battery, duplexer at 4W) for $22,000. Etherstack on the other hand has one they are bringing to market for (15-30W depending on configuration) for $30,000. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Logan5 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 I know that feeling! One of the problems is that the closest tree (an oak) is about 70 ft. horizontal and 100 ft. vertical from where my radio is located. Even calculating the side 'c' of the triangle (122 ft) that's a fair amount of line loss. That's why I think putting the repeater and antenna together in the tree makes some sense.run power to the base of the tree and get a quality enclosure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WQYC236 Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 run power to the base of the tree and get a quality enclosureExactly right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 mainehazmt Posted March 9, 2017 Report Share Posted March 9, 2017 They said no residential 110v AC power could be affixed directly to the tower.That would take away the fun of my Santa sleigh up in the air at Christmas time... Code? Wow I'm glad I don't live in an area that picky. Never had one at my house lol! Just 5 bucks for a permit to build And none needed for an antenna tower! Logan5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Logan5 Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 I was gonna go with an upside down 5 point star and red lights. mainehazmt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Jones Posted April 8, 2017 Report Share Posted April 8, 2017 "They said no residential 110v AC power could be affixed directly to the tower." The reason they won't let you run direct household 120 volts up a tower is because one side is HOT in reference to ground. If you are working on the tower, and you short yourself out to that wire, well... you get the idea. The way around that is to use an isolation transformer, just like they use on professional towers that have beacon lights, only on a smaller scale. Use a 1:1 isolation transformer inside the house. Put a 5 amp fuse on each leg of the output line, and run it up the tower as a twisted pair of 14 gauge wires. It will still be 120 Volts AC at the top, with enough current to run a 40 Amp 12 Volt power supply, but it will NOT be "directly affixed" to household power, it is connected to an inside, fuse protected, isolated "Power Supply" just like your rotor. If it falls down, it will also be safe, as neither side is in any way referenced to ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 stonecrest Posted June 22, 2017 Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 This has to be one of my favorites, https://youtu.be/QiChXNeeWII . pantherpaw9 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 mainehazmt Posted June 28, 2017 Report Share Posted June 28, 2017 Heck with it 14 ga extension cord zip tied...no one gonna mess with my santa sleigh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 rsgagnon Posted February 5, 2018 Report Share Posted February 5, 2018 love this conversation, sorry to resurrect. as a good radio technician (good not great) I like to use a rule of thumb of 2.5 feet of line for every watt of output power between a radio and an antenna. This prevents finals from overloading. Additionally, there are a number of HT duplex repeater units on e-bay for less than $20. These are not FCC certified but many HAM groups carry these for disaster response. As for separation of receive and transmit antenna's too little separation will destroy the preamp on the receiver. I have tested and find my rule of thumb on the coax works. 2.5 feet for each watt of out put power. Now some Real radio technicians will have various opinions, and these are opinions from trial and spend situations destroying stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 haneysa Posted November 12, 2018 Report Share Posted November 12, 2018 I recently contacted Midland to describe the need for a "plug-n-play" GMRS repeater. I listed all of the features that I desired, and added that making it "portable" and operable on 12VDC would be a big plus. I even suggested that they might spec-out an existing model being produced in the PRC. I even have a name for the dream machine....the Midland MXT-R50. Front-panel programmable, 50W, integral duplexer, RF circulator,etc (if necessary). If you would like to see such produced, contact Midland!Also feel free to add to the features that you would like to see. While you are at it, ask Midland to produce a GMRS/repeater-capable HT that is type-accepted! Hans 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Ian Posted November 28, 2018 Report Share Posted November 28, 2018 I recently contacted Midland to describe the need for a "plug-n-play" GMRS repeater. I listed all of the features that I desired, and added that making it "portable" and operable on 12VDC would be a big plus. I even suggested that they might spec-out an existing model being produced in the PRC. I even have a name for the dream machine....the Midland MXT-R50. Front-panel programmable, 50W, integral duplexer, RF circulator,etc (if necessary). If you would like to see such produced, contact Midland!Also feel free to add to the features that you would like to see. While you are at it, ask Midland to produce a GMRS/repeater-capable HT that is type-accepted!Both truly excellent ideas! I'll be hitting them up on Twitter and mentioning it in any relevant Facebook groups I can find… Signal amplification for the win! Hans 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 pantherpaw9 Posted December 15, 2018 Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 When code approved of my 55' tower, since the FAA required no light for it height, They said no residential 110v AC power could be affixed directly to the tower. Power for rotor is 24v and other devices use 12v. Unless you use a mobile duplexer, and a small repeater, it would be a large box. Not sure a 100' cord is a good idea. I do like the idea of eliminating so much feedline but it is more complicated as always. My current Hoffman enclosure is 24X24X18, I wonder what the wind loading would be. I do wind design for structures in Florida on a regular basis, and you would be looking at 40 psf up to 50 psf. So for 4 sq. ft. (2'x2' box) you would be looking at about 200 lbs. of lateral force on the box. Just as a general estimate. How close you are to the coast and how high above the ground you are would also make the load higher or lower, just to give you an idea. Of course any construction would need site specific calculations with local code compliance and approval. These numbers are simply for conversational purposes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
commsprepper
Does anyone currently make a Part 95 certified repeater (with the exception of Ritron)?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
28 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.