Fuggawi

I want to thank all you guys with great information and patience for us new guys.
I wouldn't have thought twice about using some of these adapters and connectors.
I'm all about the gidgits/gadgets, erector set type of building stuff.
One wouldn't think that they have that much loss by looking at them.
It makes me feel a lot better that this project will have a better chance of working.
Thanks again.

I want to thank all you guys with great information and patience for us new guys.
I wouldn't have thought twice about using some of these adapters and connectors.
I'm all about the gidgits/gadgets, erector set type of building stuff.
One wouldn't think that they have that much loss by looking at them.
It makes me feel a lot better that this project will have a better chance of working.
Thanks again.

Thanks berkinet.
Yes I did mean PL-259 connector. Sorry, typing to fast for my brain.
So, looking at your table, at 15 ft of RG-58 my loss should be 1.68 db. Which sounds very acceptable.
I guess the key for this application is, keep line as short as possible and minimize/eliminate connectors.
Thanks again.

Thanks berkinet.
Yes I did mean PL-259 connector. Sorry, typing to fast for my brain.
So, looking at your table, at 15 ft of RG-58 my loss should be 1.68 db. Which sounds very acceptable.
I guess the key for this application is, keep line as short as possible and minimize/eliminate connectors.
Thanks again.

Thanks berkinet.
Yes I did mean PL-259 connector. Sorry, typing to fast for my brain.
So, looking at your table, at 15 ft of RG-58 my loss should be 1.68 db. Which sounds very acceptable.
I guess the key for this application is, keep line as short as possible and minimize/eliminate connectors.
Thanks again.