Jump to content

jlag

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

jlag's Achievements

  1. @wayoverthere @Lscott Looks like I am a fool. The Vertex CPS yells at you when you try to program OOB but it lets you do it. I swear my eyes were playing tricks on me and the frequency was reverting to the low end when I did it a month ago. Played with it again tonight and I now have a Moto branded EVX-S24 (403-480) RXing public safety in the 480's and a Vertex branded EVX-534 (450-512) TX-RXing in the 440's (can do 4 & 5 KHz deviation as well) just using the CPS. The RX in the 480's sounds good, I don't notice any sensitivity loss. I will put the 534 on the SA and Watt meter tomorrow and see what it looks like TXing in the 440's into a dummy. Thanks for all the input. EDIT PS: Next step is to get the 7.2 volt Mitsubishi MOSFET running on the S24
  2. I have a Vertex branded EVX-539 that the recovery tool 1.03 is stating "Product Type Error" using the FIF-12. This same tool worked on Moto branded S24's and lists "EVX-530 Series" in the dropdown selection but no dice when it runs. Would you have any clues?
  3. I see, I take it the file was plain binary that you could read/edit with no type of encryption? If the radio rejected that this may be a dead end without modifying the FW in the radio. Also, did you drop the 512 down by 10MHz as well or did you go for 440-512? Or were you just trying to hack a single channel out of band?
  4. Interesting information. What was your method of modifying the plug? Did you attempt xor decryption of the plug? Were you using CE157 CPS?
  5. Could be, but it seems to key off of date/time/filename as well perhaps. If I save the same plug twice with different names the binary compare is a sea of red all through the file.
  6. I received 2 new US EVX-S24's a couple of weeks ago. Was able to run the wide band recovery with no issue using the USB cable. Great radios, fantastic TX/RX audio. The dual watch polling drop outs are very minimal compared to my Alinco, scan speed is great and superb tail suppression. A little lacking in power and buttons but I can't expect more from a package this size. I have been running some EX-560XLS's which I also like very much as well, I am looking to receive some public safety in the 480+ range. I was able to do this with the EX-560's but the S24 seems locked down pretty tight. Looks like the plugs are encrypted. I am wondering if anyone has had any success at increasing the upper RX frequency limit on the EVX-S24.
  7. Yes, as you mentioned, for example, FIT (Forest Industries Telecommunications) or EWA (Enterprise Wireless Assocation). ​I am in eastern MA, a good bit south of the line.
  8. I had checked with NESMC. VHF is waitlisted, UHF is not, but getting tight. But correct, I should have been looking at 450-470 frequencies I believe.
  9. Thanks RG7268, Makes perfect sense. It does seem that there are some 440 and 222's available for co-ordination. I certainly wouldn't want to grab a pair off a waiting list in a hot market if the frequencies would be idle 90% of the time, doesn't seem fair. Maybe its time to start a for-profit communication business, put a 100 footer up at my business site $700 is a great price considering what you are getting. Aligns with the cost of quality feed-line, antenna, duplexer, maintenance, time, time and more time. Still cheaper than a boat.
  10. Hello RadioGuy, This is interesting. 1. Would FB6 be part of Part 90 "IG - Industrial/Business Pool - Private, Conventional" frequency pair? 2. Does this mean that I could get a DBA for my business such as "XYZ Comm", get a frequency pair and "rent" time to myself/family and friends for business and personal use? 3. I have a 60 foot mast at my residence currently, would it be allowed to run an FB6/IG transmitter at my residence (legal business address)? 4. Would I be subject to a site inspection prior to operation?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.