ULTRA2 Posted June 25 Author Report Share Posted June 25 6 hours ago, WRQD922 said: using someone else’s equipment without asking first. Again, I ask. if you need permission to use a listed open repeater why not list it as a permission only repeater? To me that would have been better and that's what I would've done. SteveShannon and Raybestos 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQI663 Posted June 25 Report Share Posted June 25 13 hours ago, gortex2 said: No they dont but that doesn't mean you can use their system without permission. This is the issue with GMRS as of late. I spend thousands of dollars on my gear and use it for my use. Its not open for others. Your just as capable to spend that money and put up your own. Good for you, I won't bother you anyway - the $$ argument goes nowhere with me. (and that's you're, complements of the grammar police) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQI663 Posted June 25 Report Share Posted June 25 13 hours ago, gortex2 said: No they dont but that doesn't mean you can use their system without permission. This is the issue with GMRS as of late. I spend thousands of dollars on my gear and use it for my use. Its not open for others. Your just as capable to spend that money and put up your own. Good for you, I won't bother you anyway - the $$ argument goes nowhere with me. (and that's you're, complements of the grammar police) SteveShannon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQI663 Posted June 25 Report Share Posted June 25 13 hours ago, gortex2 said: No they dont but that doesn't mean you can use their system without permission. This is the issue with GMRS as of late. I spend thousands of dollars on my gear and use it for my use. Its not open for others. Your just as capable to spend that money and put up your own. Good for you, I won't bother you anyway - the $$ argument goes nowhere with me. (and that's you're, complements of the grammar police) SteveShannon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQI663 Posted June 25 Report Share Posted June 25 Slow going this morning.......triple post? ----sorry - still on 1st cup of coffee SteveShannon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishnfever Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 On 6/25/2024 at 4:13 AM, WRQI663 said: Good for you, I won't bother you anyway - the $$ argument goes nowhere with me. (and that's you're, complements of the grammar police) That would be "compliments" compliments of the spelling police. Sorry, I couldn't resist.... WRQC527, WRQI663, SteveShannon and 1 other 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ULTRA2 Posted June 27 Author Report Share Posted June 27 7 hours ago, WSCK940 said: spelling police. Wow, I didn't realize that my comment sparks a grammar war now too (lol) WRXR255, Fishnfever and gortex2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQC527 Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 I once received a complimentary compliment that I wrote down and filed in a compliment file as a complement to my collection of complementary compliments. Fishnfever, SteveShannon, Raybestos and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRUU653 Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 2 hours ago, WRQC527 said: I once received a complimentary compliment that I wrote down and filed in a compliment file as a complement to my collection of complementary compliments. Nice SteveShannon and WRQC527 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQI663 Posted June 28 Report Share Posted June 28 I've been enlightened ---- Now I can rest easy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.