WRXB288

DELETE DELETE DELETE Docket No: 25-133 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10425259046292/1 Interesting comments on adding unused channels to the GMRS license These channels were licensed pairs for duplex portable phones and could be used for long range repeaters. They are no longer in use.

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1042589947921/1 Read the above comment to the FCC and file your reply to this nonsense. We are not trying to link all gmrs repeater channels together. Thats not what linking is. SO this is like its something new. Its been going on for 10 years and is proven not to do any of the above. Its important if you did file comments that you file another comment on what we are asking for when we say gmrs linking. We dont want to use all the channels in a town and we have proven all of the above to be untrue. submit your comments here https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/standard Quote ref DELETE DELETE DELETE Docket No: 25-133

The fcc post is asking for you to suggest rules that you want deleted or any other changes. Many have totally confused this . You need to go submit your comments in favor of GMRS linking and at the same time you must explain what linking is because others are making comments that we want to use up all repeater channels in a town linking them all together creating some type of mesh network. Creating interference. That's what the FCC is against. There is also a claim that repeater users would not be able to regain control of there repeaters. This is all nonsense. The linked system has been proven to work for about 10 years. Ref (Docket No. 25-133) https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-219A1.pdf https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/standard I submitted a comment with a follow-up after I saw the anti-linking comments from people who have no ideal what we are asking for. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1042511135974/1 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10426037020584/1 If you have not submitted a comment do so now, If you did submit a second one explaining what gmrs repeater linking is. It is not using several all channels.

Dont give up sign this. If everyone complains we will get action. Forget about the FCC those are just rules not laws. The FCC is not in charge. Congress writes the laws. We can change this. This is how Satellite C band owners got the laws changes that allowed dish and direct tv to exist before the internet. There is a process to doing this and its been done many times. It works. When congress starts getting all these letters from people and not lobbyist they listen, Someone's going to ask the FCC WTF did they do. This will cause several actions 1 there was no comments opened before the action that's a violation. They will withdraw the rule and delay it. And congress may have hearings if we keep pushing. If so someone will have to go talk for GMRS for each state. If you want to keep linking this is what you need to do. call congress and the senate. or send this letter or send emails. https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/gmrs-repeater-linking-freedom https://www.elitedaily.com/p/whats-the-best-way-to-contact-your-congressperson-these-are-the-tips-you-need-to-know-8503943 https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?Class=1 https://www.congress.gov/contact-us

Does anyone have the pinouts to connect to the PI? Also there was talk somewhere else that they had to set the unit to simplex mode. That simplex mode was mislabeled in the software , it actually disables the internal controller and still works as a repeater. And that if it was in duplex the COS would not stay on while repeating making it not transmit into the net. Is this true, Has anyone tried this. or was this just a defective unit. I don't have one yet but am looking for more info before I buy one.

So has anyone traced out the connections for a PI to place it on the network?? If so where is COS , PPT, TX and RX audio.

Just declare GMRS is the novice class for amateur radio and allow access to 70 Centimeter band Problem solved.....