WRXL702

I recently had a similar issue interfering with my Osceola IN 600 machine, & it has a large footprint. We finally tracked it down - Source was a low band data packet transmission for a uhf simulcast paging system in the South Bend area. Yes - 500 watt paging systems are still in use in northern IN, but very little $$ spent on failing transmitter filtering. Owner had techs work on the transmitter / filters & the problem went away. Good Luck Finding........

I Suggest You Do Some Further Research On The Communications Act Of 1934, Signed Into Law By FDR. It Empowers The FCC To Create Rules As Needed For The Regulation Of Radio, Television, Wire & Later Satellite Communications In The US. Chevron Limits Federal Agencies To Interpret Laws - FCC Creates Rules As Needed For Telecommunications.

So......... Let Me Get This Straight. If There Are No Known Consequences For Actions By "Some People" Breaking Rules, Then That Would Be OK To Break That Rule. But If A Rule Was Broken That Is Monitored By YouTube Which Could Affect $$ - Then That Rule Should Be Followed. Or A Rule That Could Ban Folks From This Forum, Then That Rule Should Be Followed. Looks Like Another New Vid To Me - Rule Following By Choice Of Consequence.........

"Sounds Like Somebody Woke Up On The Wrong Side Of The Bed This Morning. Hope You Have A Better Day Tomorrow." And Now - Can We Hear From The Far Right.........

Dude - Your Transmit Frequency For The Repeater Should Be 467.725MHz / CTCSS 100.0 - Not 462.725 MHz. Re-check Your Programming.......

Simple Answer - No Suggest You Trade Or Sell The 880-2.

I Would Have To Disagree. Think His Story Has A Crack In It..........

In My Opinion - The NATO Phonetic Alphabet Should Only Be Used For A Clarification When Necessary On GMRS. It's Really Not Needed For Regular Everyday GMRS Comms.

Could Have Fooled Me......LOL "Some People" Have A Different Opinion On That - Many Folks Enjoy Your Comical Videos......

Wow - This Entire Forum Post Is Way Better Than Jerry Springer Reruns...... Maybe Randy Could Convert It To A Comical Video So All Could Watch & Not Have To Read The BS Attitudes........

"She's One Of The Good Ones We Really Want To Keep".......... WOW - Didn't Realize This Was A "For Approval" Forum Club. This Is The Worst Response Post I Have Ever Read On This Forum......... UFB..........

Correct - Because Commercial Sites Don't Have A House - They Have A Structure Or A Cabinet For Equipment. The Structure Or Cabinet Requires Proper Bonding - For Single Point Grounding - To Avoid A Ground Potential Difference.

It's Called Single Point Grounding. Reason - To Eliminate A Potential Difference Between Having (2) Separate Grounding Systems. Single Point Grounding Is Done On All Commercial Tower Sites.

I think you should revisit your original 1st sentence, "building a briefcase repeater using a couple of HT's" - And further address your future repeater site location, including elevations, antenna gain & total loss, as compared to your current HT user elevations & issues. If this suit case repeater will not be placed at an elevated location, in relation to your current HT user areas, such as a tower, hill or mountain top, with the loss in cabling & a duplexer - you will be simply wasting funds. Duplexer tuning, is irrelevant, unless all other parameters have been adressed.

FCC data base shows it was issued on 6.11.2025. Take another look at the date he posted - It's not 6.1.