WRZI712
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Classifieds
Posts posted by WRZI712
-
-
- Sshannon, AdmiralCochrane, WRUU653 and 2 others
- 5
-
-
13 minutes ago, BoxCar said:
Go to https://timesmicrowave.com/documentation/lmr-guide/ for the Times Microwave guide to their coaxial cables.
Thanks for the link
-
3 minutes ago, WRWE456 said:
A short length of RG8 will work fine as a jumper. I use a BNC adapter on my radios then a 3 foot length of RG8 with a BNC on the radio end and Type N connector on the other end. The 400 has type -N connectors on both ends as do my antennas. Type N connectors are better for UHF (which is what GMRS is) and many antennas can be ordered with them installed. That is what I did.
By the way what radio are running?
I picked up a Radioddity DB20-G new for about $85. I figure it's just enough to send me down the "Rabbit Hole"
-
1 minute ago, WRYZ926 said:
I have to agree with @kidphc on this one. You might not notice a difference in a 30 foot or shorter run but why hamper yourself.
With any antenna, height is king. Always use the best coax you can for the best performance. But height won't make up for the wrong type of coax.
I wouldn't be able to run the LMR400 straight to the back of my radio so what would be a suitable jumper coax to run and would the jumper have any negative affect?
-
1 minute ago, kidphc said:
Don't go with a higher loss cable coax. Additional height or additional gain from a higher gain antenna will be negated in the losses of the coax.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Thanks...that's pretty much what I expected.
-
12 minutes ago, WRYZ926 said:
I would go with option 2 unless you can get your antenna higher. And you won't have any problems with LMR400 over a 20, 35 or even 50 foot run.
Thanks for the clarification. So in this case the height of the antenna outweighs the length of the coax. Would the opposite be true if you were to run a lower quality coax like RG8X?
-
-
Hello,
I'm relatively new to the GMRS world and I'm in the process of setting up a base station on the second floor of my house. I have two choices for antenna placement that would also affect the length of coax that I run. So here are the two options I have...which option would you choose and why.
1) Antenna mounted 20' above the ground on the rear of the house with approximately 20' of lmr 400 coax to my radio. The top of the antenna will be approx 10' below the peak of the roof and partially obstructed by the house.
2) Antenna mounted 30' above the ground on the peak of the roof with approx 35' of lmr 400 coax to my radio. The top of the antenna will be roughly 5' above the peak of the roof with no obstructions for 360
3) In this case just choose the easiest mounting method because the difference would be negligible.
Thanks for all the input
Pete
WRZI712
4 SWR reading on my new TRAM 1486-Help
in Technical Discussion
Posted
One thing I quickly found out from experience is don't buy a great antenna setup and then go cheap on the coax. Spend the money and get 50ft of LMR-400 as your main feed line and then run a couple of feet of LMR-240 or similar to the radio.