NC654

That is exactly what I was told when I got into Ham radio back in 1995. There was not a whole lot of the computer aspect going on back then, it was mostly soldering irons, making PC boards from scratch, and linking equipment together. Back in 2000 I had a fist full of Microsoft certifications, but I was absolutely awful with programming which is probably why I was having a bit of a time with this one.

I will put the power settings on those back to low for close communication. I just wanted to see if they would work, and apparently they do. I managed to raise two repeaters with only the 2 watts.

Now this is more like it. A big THANK YOU to MichaelLAX, Lscott, Backformore70, and KAF6045 for all your help and input! Screen shot is attached where I could change the TX / RX frequencies for the GMRS split independently, along with the power settings functions. I am still looking for the thread where somebody was getting 4.82 watts output, still no luck.

Aha, that's the problem. Don't you just love getting brain farts? ?

Mine does not display like that at all, maybe I am doing something wrong. If you look at my screenshot, on the right side there are the 22 frequencies, and this is the one and only time I see a set of frequencies like that at all in the entire program - both in the FRS and EU programming software. Am I opening up the wrong file maybe? I am looking at the EXE file in the T-11 folder.

Evidently the frequency pair only shows in the software he has, just opening it in a Hex editor only shows a single frequency per channel - it has no separation for TX and RX. I am able to edit the frequencies without a problem as both the software and the radio will accept the new values and will TX / RX without issue. Since that is the case, I doubt the effort to do a split on these radios is even worth it for the time and effort involved since there are tons of other options out there that program much more easily in CHIRP. Actually, I am a bit surprised that CHIRP has not included these radios in their software as of yet. On the upside the T-11's would make good cheap radios on the UHF business bands or any other situation where simplex is all that's needed.

I somehow confused that post, probably low on coffee at that moment. You managed to get the TX separated from the RX but there is no way that I can see to do it in the hex editor since there is only one set of frequencies that I can find. Maybe there is an offset that is set to Zero you inadvertently bypassed? Looking at both the FRS and EU versions only turns up one frequency for all 22 channels that automatically occupy the TX and RX fields with no way to edit independently. Any ideas?

I could have sworn I bookmarked the discussion where they were putting this radio through tests and pushing it's limits, but I may have to go through my never ending sea of bookmarks to find it. There is the possibility I bookmarked it on my other computer which I will have to look at today. My Linux machine might be a better option if I dissect the programming software and mess with it in there since I have a Windows shell installed on it.

These T-11 radios are not capable of transmitting on the VHF MURS frequencies, they are designed for UHF.

I saw that page, but it is for MacOS. Since I'm using Windows 8.1 I had to download Bluestacks and then find the Windows version of Hexfiend, then open it through Bluestacks. The Mac version won't work I did edit the only set of frequencies I found in the T11 software (using Hex-Works) which put the new frequencies in both the TX and RX ? This may take some time.

I tried to find Hex Fiend and it seems it is no longer available However, I will have a look at Hex-Works possibly over the weekend if I get time. Trying to locate the power setting could be challenging but that will be after I get the frequency fields changed successfully.

I remember reading a post somewhere on another site that they measured about 4.82 watts output on high power. That was done on 2 radios that were taken apart to the point they could capture the TX power at the base of where the antenna would be. There were a couple other tests done such as frequency deviation, RX sensitivity, and battery life, and all were very good but I do not remember those specifics since I was mostly impressed by the almost 5 watt output. I tried for the last hour or so to find the site, but no luck yet. Since they are capable of almost 5 watts, then the low power setting might be able to be removed on the FRS portion. I may even try to use these on the 70cm ham bands since I am licensed there as well. All I need to do is find a suitable editor, but the ones I have looked at so far do not have the same layout as the one you used so I will try Hex Fiend and see how far I can get with it.

Which HEX editor did you use for that? I was trying to find a way to change the TX frequency for the split, but did not think of doing it that way. Now I'm wondering if the TX power can be changed as well through the editor.

Where did you find the software? I got a pair of these a while back but gave up looking for the software and now they just sit collecting dust.

I have been using this antenna with excellent results. I think the reason is that it has a broader bandwidth, and is a lot taller than the little GMRS I see on ebay. The coverage is great as far as I am concerned, I would have to say that it works just as well (probably better) than any of the comparable GMRS specific antennas out there. And I also use it for amateur radio. Your results will vary because I have mine dead center on the roof of a 2015 Tundra, but your roof is the best location and should work just as well as my setup. One note: I did cut my cable to leave only as much as I needed to get from the roof to the radio, which eliminated about half or more cable loss which can be critical in the UHF band.