-
Posts
2256 -
Joined
-
Days Won
183
marcspaz last won the day on December 7 2024
marcspaz had the most liked content!
Profile Information
-
Unit Number
0
-
Location
Location: Location:
marcspaz's Achievements
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Fixed Station vs Base Station?
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Fixed Station vs Base Station?
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION
-
Seapup reacted to a post in a topic: NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
AdmiralCochrane reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
AdmiralCochrane reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
Raybestos reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
Davichko5650 reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
WRUU653 reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
I'm sure you folks are getting great coverage where you are, but there are a lot a variables that make it so that works in those situations. It becomes problematic for a vast majority of the US. On the ocean or in perfectly flat land areas, if you have an antenna that is on a 100' mast, you are only covering 14 mile radius. Even if you bump to a 300' mast (which cost over $1m for a good commercial grade 300' tower) you are only looking at a radius of about 25 miles. To cover 100 miles (200 total miles end to end) your antenna needs to be almost 1 mile above the average terrain. That simply isn't possible in a vast majority of the US. If you are able to put an antenna on a mountain that overlooks a valley, you are golden, though. We have one of our antennas 1,000 feet above average terrain and we are barely pushing it a 45 miles, with dead spots inside that coverage area due to terrain. That particular repeater is known throughout the mid-Atlantic for being one of the top 3 repeaters, even when we include amateur radio coverage, and the top coverage repeater for GMRS in the area. Due to the terrain limits here, people/companies running farms need networked radios for reliable coverage and most of them are using commercial radio for it.
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
WRUE951 reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
I always love hearing/reading opinions of others. Especially if they are different than mine, because I may learn something new that could lead to a position change. Friendly chat is always welcome. You have some very good and very valid points. I don't see anything I disagree with. Good analysis, for sure.
-
Davichko5650 reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
WRUE951 reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
SteveShannon reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
I don't like the idea of linking any repeaters for the sake of rag-chewing... but there is some practical applications that many seem to overlook. Things like remote receivers for extended talk-in to a high power repeater than can't hear handheld and other low power radios. Or, in an area that needs expanded coverage for emergency response (such as areas prone to flooding or severe snow causing issues) and any number of other situations. Maybe you own a massive farm or ranch and one repeater just won't cover it. Also, people keep saying linking repeaters is illegal and it is not. It is 100% legal. There is, however, a rule against using networks to link repeaters. You can do RF linking over GMRS frequencies (which uses more bandwidth, not a very friendly idea) or you can link repeaters over another radio service that you are licensed for. Also... just because you do or don't like something... that doesn't mean you're right. We are not in a world, or at least we shouldn't be in a world, were the majority bans what they don't like and mandates what they do. That is not freedom. If you don't like how the radio service is used near you, then don't use it.
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: Linking GMRS Repeaters
-
marcspaz reacted to a post in a topic: NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION
-
This bubbled up on my local feed today. I am not sure if this was an honest error or if this dude was legit trying to get into the law enforcement system, but the FCC only sent a no-no letter. Part of me thinks that if it was an honest error and the person was just trying to repurpose the radio, that's fine... don't do it again. Another part of me is thinking "he admitted to putting the radio on that frequency himself, which implies some nefarious behavior and he should get more than a warning." Anyway, just a reminder to try not to cause interference when you are attempting to repurpose those older LMR Part 90 radios. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-410850A1.pdf Snip of text...
-
Very odd. You can definitely ignore it. The treaty is long gone and the restrictions were removed almost a decade ago.
-
I have a copy of my license from 2018 and it's not on my license. I downloaded a new copy about 5 minutes ago, and no reference to it today, either.
-
While i think you are very antagonist/disrespectful in a vast majority of your posts, and have a tendency to be wrong in a lot of your posts about tech and rules, I actually agree with the general sentiment of your comment. However, cell coverage is far from 99% of the US. They fudge the numbers by saying 99%+ of the population... not 99% of the land mass. It's closer to to 3.5%-4% of the total square miles of the US having (somewhat) continuous coverage, and only about 53% (which includes that 3.5%-4%) of square miles has a 70% reliability rate of cell service. Things like two-way radios and satellite communications are critical in about 47%+ of the country.
-
The US/Canada treaty that established the Line A/B/C/D radio restrictions expired a decade ago. The FCC removed the limits from PRS (GMRS) with the 2017 updates.
-
“High End” antennas worse than stock?
marcspaz replied to WSHC247's question in Technical Discussion
I have done handheld antenna testing and it's not that easy. I wouldn't recommend an SWR meter, either. You can't replicate the ground plane of the chassis and the effects of having the radio in your hand, which makes taking the measurements difficult. The closest I have come without literally building a sampling circuit onto the radio was by making small metal table into a ground plane, mounting an SMA connector on it with proper length cable between the base of the antenna and the VNA. Depending on the cable type, you will want the cable to be almost 7 feet (6.9) to be sure you are outside of the near field while testing. -
As others have mentioned, there is no difference in physical hardware as you move from one station type to another. Station type is established based on how it is used, and can be classed as any other station type simply by changing how the radio is used. Thise use cases are explained in the rules, as mentioned by others. @UncleYoda you're kind spicy today! LoL For what its worth, ther is absolutely zero regulations and zero statements of clarification that was released by the FCC that says GMRS repeaters can't be linked. The rules contradict themselves, which is why the FCC released a clarification that repeaters can't be linked over a network for the purpose of expanding coverage. As it stands right now, there is no prohibition on linking repeaters for the purpose of extending range over an RF link, because an RF linked is not a network under any definition.
-
I may be wrong, but isn't every new OTC GMRS radio manufactured outside of the US?
-
Who are you asking?
-
What is "warranty"? I've never heard of it.
-
1x1 call signs are typically used for special events and issued for less than 1 year at a time. Sometimes they are only issued for a few days. However, if no one else asks to use the call sign and the person currently holding it asks for an extension or re-issue, its typically not a problem for the current holder. Because there are so few of them, those of us who do use them, will coordinate among ourselves prior to going to the actual/formal coordinators.