-
Posts
357 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Classifieds
Everything posted by quarterwave
-
http://www.randl.com/shop/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=71892 http://www.powerwerx.com/two-way-radios/mobile-radios/ The basis for affordable also takes into account that "cheap" may play into it. If you want something you can program, works right out of the box, etc...there are a couple options. However, my preference would be a good Motorola (insert your brand here). Although you may have to do a little more work to get your self setup with software and cables, you will end up with a really good commercial grade radio that will go the distance, and look nice, like a pro, in your vehicle. For GMRS you can't go wrong with a GM300 (or sim) and a 1/4 wave antenna. 40 watts and 16 channel, gives plenty of options.
-
I found the 1650 on eBay, was just looking for the basic 1630, but found the other one at a bargain price. I'm going to direct interface it to a Motorola Radius (low power) mobile and use as a control base to the repeater. I have worried about having "control"...my repeater is a MTR2000 so it's 100% duty cycle, but has a TOT of course, and I'm not worried about it, but just that something can get stuck on the air. So, I think the control base idea with the right TOT on it is best, and I am also looking at a WeMo web enabled outlet/switch where I could just shut off power to the control base power supply remotely if something were to happen and it hung on the air. Also juggled the notion of just putting this on a separate base station / it's own frequency. I use 2 different pairs now, and always scan 675 in my radios too...so maybe a base on 675 with the wx alerts only would be good. There are no other repeaters anywhere near me...so channel usage is not an issue.
-
Meanwhile, back at the ranch. I talked to another repeater operator who is using WX on GMRS, and he used a Reecom, says it works well, and has good EOM reset. I found the $80 Reecom model on eBay, new and shipped for $20...so I bought it. This unit is supposed to have a alert audio out, and a alert relay out connection. I will start testing it out soon. I intend to tie it to a low power mobile, which I can use to hit my repeater if all goes well. I will share more if/when this thing gets going.
-
surecom gr-500 repeater found on 409shop
quarterwave replied to blastco2's topic in Equipment Reviews
Yep...I've built several, but that little thing is cute...if it works, could be useful in the right situation. I remember working on a FBI style suitcase repeater once, it was basically a couple of Motorola HT's in a briefcase with a battery and little duplexer. I think the portables were HT90 guts....VHF. I also remember some older repeaters for industrial use that were 2 and 4 watt, I think Motorola and Ritron had one...like late 80's early 90's. Motorola had that SYSTEL which was a UHF 2 watt box with interconnect. When I worked at the M shop I interconnected our AT&T phone system to an interconnect on a 5 watt base so our guys could take or make calls from their vans if they were parked outside or close by the shop. It was handy. We also used it to receive a DTMF that triggered one of the overhead doors to open...it was easier and cheaper than buying a dozen $150 remotes! What gets me on these repeaters are these goof balls on ebay hacking together some old used mobiles or portables in what looks like a spaghetti nightmare and calling it a repeater...mostly for GMRS, but some guy has one he demo's as cross band....146 in 467 out....now he knows just about enough to be dangerous. -
surecom gr-500 repeater found on 409shop
quarterwave replied to blastco2's topic in Equipment Reviews
Might be handy for certain situations, maybe even a travel repeater...at 4w if you use a good antenna and keep the line short at least you could double your range. I can see strapping one to the balcony of the beach house! Most of this stuff is so china-cheap...and a gamble if it works. I'd be interested in the price. -
has anyone bought the anytone part 90 and 95 HT
quarterwave replied to manntownrob's topic in Equipment Reviews
https://anytonetech.com/ Full line up. -
Not exactly about linking, but I was trolling the eBay the other day and a guy was selling a "GMRS cross band repeater". He had 2 M120 (a UHF and a VHF) Motorola mobiles, a home brew criss cross cable, and was showing how to make it work with a Chinese radio which was showing 462.xxx and 146.xxx. I wanted to send him a question on his listing asking if he knew that was illegal...but I get tired of fussing. He knows, I'll put money on it. Of course, it's not illegal until he/someone transmits.
-
New GMRS/MURS part 95 cert HT's at a decent price
quarterwave replied to rareed63's topic in Equipment Reviews
I noticed that too...no rhyme or reason in the programming...like they just threw something at the wall and it stuck. The GMRS version I saw had MURS in it too, but it pretty much looked like anyone with any knowledge would want to reprogram it. -
It's always been "allowed" so to speak, there just hasn't been an "allowed", feasible way to do it. Interconnection to PSTN refers to "telephone interconnects" or "patches" which run through switched telephone services, as in it has to be dialed to connect. Use of leased lines to remote to, or connect repeaters has always been "legal" but you won't find operators who want to pay good money for a leased line just to connect GMRS repeaters. In-band linking isn't ideal, not enough seperation, so that leaves voip, which, as mentioned, wasn't even around when these rules were written.
-
When I started in radio an older tech said the only difference in a 1/4 wave and gain antennae was the price. I have never gone wrong with a good old 1/4 wave on any of my UHF equipment. I used a 1/4 wave Vhf as a scanner antenna for years. The only time I had any better service out of a gain antenna was when I had a BC780 scanner in my work van. It had a ladder rack on it, and a UHF Motorola Spectrum (about 20 year old vintage) out shined the 1/4 VHF for both VHF and UHF reception, and 800 was about the same.
-
Yeah, that RS unit was neat...surprised no one else has tried it. It's still a unicorn on eBay...just happened to see one once.
-
Here is the thread from RR.com...so I don't reinvent the wheel... http://forums.radioreference.com/gmrs-frs/305669-cool-little-gmrs-mobile-introduced-midland-ces-2015-a.html
-
Why won't "Broadcastify" allow GMRS repeaters to be monitored.
quarterwave replied to div3405's topic in Miscellaneous Topics
I thought it may be because public safety, etc is public information, HAM is an open "hobby", but GMRS and likewise a "business" repeater or base, are more of a private deal. Not private in a "protected" sense or under some guise of privacy from listeners, but the type of communication is really not in the spirit of "action" most scanner peeps are after. -
I like the looks of the TERA unit on the site now, keypad model. I have checked their site before, they seem to be carrying more and more radio gear. I like it!
-
Good info on duty cycle for repeater builders
quarterwave replied to rickety's question in Technical Discussion
I won't disagree with most of that, however being a M employee in the hay day of those mobiles, you may be surprised at their hardiness. Yes, while they are certainly not a MSF5000, they make decent little repeaters. For HAM use? No, HAMs like to TALK! You need a 100% duty cycle repeater for that, but for GMRS, or even light duty commercial, they can and do work. I ran a 40 watt M120 as my GMRS repeater TX for 16 years and never had to touch it. When I did remove it and replace the cabinet with a MTR2000, that M120 was on freq, had a good RX even though that wasn't really being used, and keyed to 41 watts, dropping to about 37 after 2 minutes. Now, I am not saying it would do that continuously, but for the sporadic conversations we had on the repeater, it was fine. Never had an issue. I had TOT set for 3 minutes with a re-key time, so people knew to give it a rest, and I mounted it with the heat sink up at the top of the cabinet with 2 - 4 inch fans right above it and controlled air flow in the front and over the radio. The RX was a M208, and it still works great too, as a receiver on my secondary repeater. The later M120/GM300/Maxtrac series had power cut back, so unlike the older M100/M2xx/Maxtracs, you didn't have to set the power back on a 40 watt to say 25, or a 25 to 10 to keep from frying it easily. The Maxtrac series PA was also used in Desktrac bases and repeaters. So yes, these are not meant to be heavy duty repeaters, but for some GMRS guys, they make good ones, and can be the difference in spending a few hundred dollars and a few thousand with no better results. I wouldn't scare anyone off from using them, especially in a first time project. -
MURS pre programmed equipment
quarterwave replied to PastorGary's topic in Multi-Use Radio Service (MURS)
I figure it's like the GMRS rules, where we, the licensees mainly keep the hobby in check. With MURS, no one going to even know how or that they should complain....not many people could/would even realize someone is using 5 watts versus 2, and probably wouldn't care anyway. Can't imagine the FCC caring at all, since they don't tend to want to keep FRS-ers off of GMRS for us. I'm in a semi rural area, used to hear more on .600 and .570 than I do now. I think alot of drive through's have switched to digital systems, seemed to be alot of them using these freqs in years past. I know that one business around here used to have .600 in their 45 watt mobiles. When they converted to narrow for the rest of their system, .600 came out of the programming and a newly licensed itinerant went in it's place, so they are legal now. They never had a license for .600 anyway, my source said they started using it in portables many years ago to coordinate with a contractor and just never stopped...ended up in mobiles...and through changing people overseeing radio for them, the upkeep and legalities got lost in the shuffle. They are square now, but it just shows how things get forgotten about and companies end up getting fined...all because people changed jobs, left, ball got dropped, no one paying attention. And for every one that gets fixed, there is probably 10 more not. I worked for a radio shop years ago, so I learned the right way.....follow the rules, and it's no one's fault but your own if you don't. -
MURS pre programmed equipment
quarterwave replied to PastorGary's topic in Multi-Use Radio Service (MURS)
I didn't do much research, but thought I would ask aloud, with the MURS rules for 2 watts, I wonder how many licensed and non licensed radios are being used on .570 and .600 at wideband and 5 watts simply because they were grandfathered on the freqs. -
I've operated a repeater for many years, but never publicized it because it was mostly family and we didn't want anyone else in the mix. I paid for it, so I get to say. In our area there are few to no real GMRS operators besides me/friends except for the occasional bubble packer that wanders on to the freq I use, of course we run DPL so we don't hear them. With that said, I do have an "open" repeater. I put up a lower powered unit on a different freq at the same site. I have it listed, and I too say open to all licensed users, follow all rules. It's doesn't ID on it's own, so it's up to them to use it right and ID. Not sure I have ever heard anyone use it. I do know a local rental yard runs simplex (illegally) on that freq and they don't like it when I am testing. LOL. In area's of heavy use, I can see why people don't want to share an expensive repeater they want to use for them and their buddies. Nothing says they have to. But, I do think that if you have the means (a small repeater made from 2 mobiles is cheap) and there are lots of people using, put up a public machine too. As far as HAM goes, I know anyone can use the local (to me) clubs repeaters, but you are encouraged to join if you want to gab all the time. Back in the day, you had to join to get a DTMF code to use the autopatch.
-
Yeah...GMRS has access to the lower side offsets at full power (4 watts), FRS can only use them with 1/2 watt. FRS is exclusive use only on the upper side 467 offsets at 1/2 watt. Been that way a long time. I have used 462.6125 and 462.6375 as my channel 3 & 4 for simplex in my Motorola's for years, repeater and T/A in 1 & 2.
-
I'm not sure it was ever specifically mentioned in the GMRS rules, either allowed or not allowed. 6GHz microwave is used for all kinds of stuff. I don't see why a person could not use it to link a couple of stations, but I think it centers on channels, and the finite number of them. Is it necessary, and does it limit others ability to share the channels (if you have a 650 tied to a 700 in two adjacent locations, maybe 10 miles apart or even the same channel and further apart used just for creating more "coverage" for a unified system). Probably just comes back to common sense. Lots of dreamy projects out there, but practical and necessary is another story. 6 GHz microwave hop and the license will cost a few bucks.
-
Great points to reiterate. I have talked to people about these time and time again. People that know enough about radio to be dangerous often think more power is better. but with these repeaters, location is everything. If your portable radio is 4 watts and the antenna height is about 5 feet when transmitting, and you can make the repeater just fine...then your repeater only really needs 4 watts at the antenna to get back to you the same. Of course, there can be other factors, but this is why those little 12w UHF industrial repeaters always worked well at manufacturing plants, you put them on the smokestack or the water tower, etc...and you had all the range you needed for the job at hand. When I worked for M we had a big plant that had 6 or 7, 25 watt UHF repeaters going....set it and forget it. I don't think we ever went back for anything on those until we moved them once. On a wider scale, we had a volunteer fire system with the "100 Watt or die" mentality. Over the years they had gotten more and more portables until that was the primary radio, and the mobiles they now had were 45 watt dash mounts. The repeater was at an awesome site, so we had their repeater set for about 50 watts, and you could always hear it at around 20 miles further than they could talk in...but that was ok, no need to talk in on a portable from 2 counties over! They never knew it wasn't running at 100 watts, they couldn't tell. The worst case of this not being heeded was a manufacturing plant on about 300 acres...with 6 VHF repeaters, and antennae on the roof (about 40 feet off the ground) and among various exhaust stack, piping, railings, AC units, etc....all things that deflect and attenuate signals. They had a "guy" that insisted on big power. Well, with 6 VHF repeaters running constantly during the busy day, that place, and a 1/2 mile around it, is a giant intermod factory! They recently narrow banded, of course, and I was told they dropped the power to 50 at the base except one repeater that's at 75-80 because the head Maintenance guy wants to hear it at his house 20 miles away....boo hoo...I'm sure this place provides him a cell phone. I heard they were advised to reduce the power...not sure if it was for the intermod issue, or the FCC reduced their power. Either way....that's up to 12 VHF frequencies on the air at once! I would venture to say 10-15 watts would work just fine on those repeaters. After all the years, still can't see why they are on VHF at all...but this point, they should be on a UHF or 800 trunk, which could be put on a on-site tower and be easier to service, etc. Oh well, not my money.
-
Any Experience with these setups... ?
quarterwave replied to PastorGary's question in Technical Discussion
The shop I worked for put in 2 UHF repeaters in high profile locations on opposite ends of a large county for a water utility some years ago. They wanted coverage everywhere...the mobiles were 100 watt Maratracs. They used no portables, with the exception of a supervisor or two that had a PacRT with a 1 watt VHF portable so he had coverage out of the truck. The base did not want to switch frequencies. Ever. But they wanted to hear both repeaters, and have mobiles on one repeater hear the other, and vice versa. They got some waiver on the license to make this happen, there was a letter from the FCC at the time, I had seen it. The frequencies were exclusive for 150 miles and one pair was 450's the other 460's. So to accomplish it, they put a link radio at 4-5 watts with a yagi on each repeater site, pointing at the other. When one was being used, it keyed it's link radio with same audio on the input of the other repeater (not a link frequency). Trucks could be on either repeater and talk, no channel changes needed. They just ran on what ever channel worked in their area. Base stayed on one channel...but we did put the other in it just in case of failure. They did not have talkaround at all at first, but I think later on, the shop added it for one frequency. -
Simplex repeater dual antena seperation
quarterwave replied to truevil's question in Technical Discussion
I have seen those, doesn't look hard to do. One of the contacts goes straight through the battery. I do know there are some chargers with 3 pins, and some with 4, essentially one is missing on the 3 pin. I have like 12-13, I should look at them. -
Simplex repeater dual antena seperation
quarterwave replied to truevil's question in Technical Discussion
I have tried alot of them....HT600, P100, P200, HT1000, MT1000, P110, GP300, P1225, Visar. A good HT600 was hard to beat...and I like the P1225 most. I was assigned a new Gp300 when I worked for M. 8F later converted to 16F...UHF as we used M Community repeaters all over the place. I still have it! -
Simplex repeater dual antena seperation
quarterwave replied to truevil's question in Technical Discussion
I like the M1225 and P1225...I have a couple of each. I also have a new 4F M1225...in the box! Most of my mobiles are older, but work reliably. Most of them are in Farm equipment. What I am working towards with my system is eventually making it a primarily handheld system. The coverage I have is fine, if I can improve it, I will, but with the cost of equipment and they way I use it outside of some farm coordination now and then, just doesn't warrant needing mobiles. I will keep one for my pickup truck, but other than that I want to focus on a portable radio coverage system...just like cell phone use...more of a carried device than a fixed, or fixed in a vehicle thing.