SteveShannon

You may want to search this forum for threads on Linked Repeaters.

I guess @WRWT612 could legally adopt all the people in his 501(c)3 organization, but it’s probably easier and cheaper to just pay $35/license. That’s only $3.50/year each.

They are.

Same guy but with a forum membership rather than posting as a guest.

No, none whatsoever, unless you have a grandfathered license.

Maybe, but maybe not. It’s not just a two watt radio; it has an easy to see display, controls that can be used without removing gloves, and it can be made more rugged than a handheld simply due to the physical size. Plus it stays with the piece of equipment in which it’s mounted. A company might prefer it for those reasons, especially if they have had handheld units walk off accidentally. If you’re running a business and MURS radios have proven to work for you, and you want to permanently mount a radio in your forklifts, backhoes, or even the office, this form factor works better than a handheld. The simple fact is that businesses don’t care much about RF output as long as it’s enough. $369 for a radio used by a business just isn’t very expensive at all when compared to Motorola commercial radios.

It’s $369 (sales tax is simply a function of the state you live in) and it appears to be a retuned and reduced power version of the kg-1000g, which is $389. They probably didn’t start all over from scratch, and parts is parts, so with the possible exception of a couple of smaller final output transistors it would be priced similarly. The deletion of the higher priced finals could account for the $20 lower price. And @WRXB215 has a real point, they probably don’t anticipate selling a ton of 2 watt mobile radios so economies of scale play a small role. I’m less surprised by the cost than I am by the fact that they built the product at all. I wonder if they simply retooled a commercial radio.

That bundle advertising indicates that it came with the MXTA26 whip, which is a much better antenna than a ghost antenna. Ghost antennas are okay when you have wide open spaces with little vegetation and your truck is up high, but the MXTA 26 has twice as much gain and a larger radiator. Getting your antenna up as high as possible is very important also, usually. You say it’s “mounted correctly” but some mounting places are more effective than others, sometimes much more effective. Where the antenna is mounted can affect the propagation of the signal causing it to be biased in one direction or another. Are you able to activate repeaters when you’re near them? Are you surrounded by vegetation?

I wasn’t able to login to the site earlier. I suspect the denial of service attacks were going on because the address couldn’t be found:

The forum was down for quite a while. Rich has been experiencing some denial of service attacks recently. Perhaps it’s related to that. Obviously it’s back up now. Try signing in again.

Not if you use a beacon transmitting one -way messages. But yes, if you’re tracking a person or hidden repeater which is engaged in two-way communication.

You’re not missing anything.

On a Tupperware lid.

Welcome, I hope you enjoy it here!

I don’t know. Is communicating through a repeater enough to make it a control station? After looking up the definition I think you’re right. Here’s the definition of a control station: Control station. A station at a fixed location that communicates with mobile stations and other control stations through repeater stations, and may also be used to control the operation of repeater stations. Here’s the definition of a base station: Base station. A station at a fixed location that communicates directly with mobile stations and other base stations.

I think you could.

The difference is that a repeater is used for two way communications and a repeater is allowed to operate under automatic control. A beacon (the fox) typically used in a foxhunt does one way communications, which I’ve already explained is prohibited in GMRS, and would be operating under automatic control which is prohibited except for repeaters. 95.1747 GMRS automatic control. Notwithstanding the prohibition in § 95.347, GMRS repeater stations may be operated by automatic control. In addition depending on the beacon it might be transmitting continuously which is prohibited. Simply put, a fox such as is typically used for amateur radio foxhunts would violate the regulations. A hidden repeater, depending on how its used, might be just fine. Whether the FCC can detect a regulation violation has nothing to do with whether something is a violation. My question is why are you trying to make GMRS more like ham radio?

And repeaters are allowed to use automatic control so that’s still not an issue. (95.1747)

I can’t find fault with that idea.

Usage is what determines whether a radio is a base station, a mobile station, a fixed station, a control station, a repeater, or a handheld portable station. So while you use a mobile radio as a base station you have to follow the regulations for base stations. The FCC will almost certainly never know or even care though, but I just thought you might want to know what the regulations say.

The second thing with AI answers is that they are drawn from the “collective wisdom of the internet.” You might not have asked correctly. The first is that AI has no authority to answer the question. But go ahead and trust it. Here’s an example:

I use a Yaesu FT-4x with a tiny little Comet antenna sometimes when range isn’t an issue. It works well. Here’s a picture:

Me too! It’s no substitute for actually using a key but it’s a great way to learn to identify the characters by their sounds.

Exactly, it’s good etiquette and done often in the ham world as if introducing oneself (which we often are) but not required.

I’m pretty sure I tried G4Fon when I first got interested in Morse code. It didn’t engage me like Morse Mania. Morse Mania is more of a game.