Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For a decade these devices weren't even know to the court systems because they classified them top secret.  They did this for the expressed reason of warrantless searches of large areas using cell phone technology.  They almost never revealed how the information was gotten or made up stories at how they determined the crime was committed until somewhat recently the word got out about the stingrays and then that's when the judicial started to get involved.

I've know about these devices for quite some time.  Comes with the territory of being a conspiracy theorist.

Posted

My bet would be if they WERE using radios they'd be the cheap bubble pack FRS radios you'd get from WalMart.  I don't think they'd be intelligent enough to get real GMRS radios and use them. If they were they'd not be protesting in the first place. 

Posted
3 hours ago, WSAA635 said:

My bet would be if they WERE using radios they'd be the cheap bubble pack FRS radios you'd get from WalMart.  I don't think they'd be intelligent enough to get real GMRS radios and use them. If they were they'd not be protesting in the first place. 

So only stupid people protest?

Posted
10 hours ago, SteveShannon said:

So only stupid people protest?

 

4 hours ago, SteveShannon said:

It’s sad that it’s always so much easier to simply condemn people as stupid rather than trying to understand the actual issues…

So what do you think "the issues" are?

Anyone who thinks it's ok to shelter criminals is totally on the wrong side of things. It doesn't matter where they're from, they either go to prison or back to their home country. Protecting them in "sanctuary cities" is unacceptable.

Posted
58 minutes ago, WSAA635 said:

 

So what do you think "the issues" are?

Anyone who thinks it's ok to shelter criminals is totally on the wrong side of things. It doesn't matter where they're from, they either go to prison or back to their home country. Protecting them in "sanctuary cities" is unacceptable.

The issues are the constitutionality of deportation without due process, presumption of guilt (again failure to abide by the constitutional requirements of due process), wholesale “roundups” at locations based on “Hispanic presence”, etc.  I would go further except I wish to respect the forum rules against debating politics. And don’t get me wrong; I wish to see actual criminals and criminal behavior punished after due process. But none of those issues imply that a person who disagrees with you and your beliefs is stupid.  In fact many of them are pretty intelligent.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.