Jump to content

Adding a repeater


Guest WRWI253 - Brian in Indiana

Recommended Posts

Guest WRWI253 - Brian in Indiana

My county does not have a public GMRS repeater, not sure we even have any private GMRS repeater systems.  I am a ham, and I know for 2m repeaters you need to run coordinated frequencies.   If I wanted to get a couple folks together and we wanted to put a repeater up in Johnson County, does that need to be coordinated with anyone?  We would most likely want to connect it to the Midwest GMRS system 169.   Might be able to get a system setup in Morgan County as well, but would be most interested in getting Johnsons County setup.  Just noodling some ideas, don't have a repeater purchased or anything else yet.  Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there  are no repeaters in your area then the 5 frequencies are available. If there is a repeater operating, you are required to give that user priority for the channel and either select another channel or reach agreement to operate so not to cause interference to the existing user. The rule reads you must avoid causing interference but accept any interference from another station operating on the same frequency. Using tones or codes on a channel does not stop interference as you are both using the same channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never read anything about giving an existing GMRS repeater "priority" for the channel.  I have read that you should monitor prior to transmission and definitely avoid creating willful or destructive interference, and I'd agree that is good practice.

I would also agree that it's a good idea to do some due diligence and avoid putting two repeaters in the same area on the same frequency pair - especially if there are other un-used channels available.

I've got a nephew over in Owens County. From my time spent there, there was very little in the way of GMRS repeater traffic. There was a fair amount of simplex going on with farmers, and it did seem that some of it was higher powered mobiles on the repeater inputs. I'd be wary of relying on just monitoring the 462.xxx side of the pair for repeater outputs.  Better to put an antenna up high were you might plan to put your repeater, and spend some time listening to the 467.xxx inputs before you make any equipment purchasing decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Radioguy7268 said:

I have never read anything about giving an existing GMRS repeater "priority" for the channel.  I have read that you should monitor prior to transmission and definitely avoid creating willful or destructive interference, and I'd agree that is good practice.

Exactly this ^^^

Repeaters don't have reserved channels.  If a channel is busy, I'll go somewhere else, but if I listen and the channel is free, am I obligated to know that a repeater might use that frequency? 

How is it possible for me to even know that a channel is the output channel  of a repeater? 

Once someone is using a frequency, whether for simplex communications or as the output of a repeater, others should respect that. That's only right. 

Having a repeater tone set on your receiver will invariably lead to a collision because a person  using a repeater won't hear someone who is transmitting without a tone or with a different tone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Radioguy7268 said:

I have never read anything about giving an existing GMRS repeater "priority" for the channel.  I have read that you should monitor prior to transmission and definitely avoid creating willful or destructive interference, and I'd agree that is good practice.

There is no rule about giving an existing repeater priority but there is a rule within Part 15 that states a station must avoid causing interference. That rule (admonition) is repeated in many other parts of the regulation. Simply translated into practical usage is if someone is already there, you need to go somewhere else. With only 5 channels, it can be difficult to find an unused pair, but it is the responsibility of the new station to either negotiate a sharing agreement with the incumbent or forego establishing their site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.