WRYZ926 Posted January 7 Report Posted January 7 Here is a good video about FCC enforcement. Granted the idiot deserves what he gets for interfering with firefighters trying to put out a forest fire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJZroDsXBrA amaff and Whiskey363 2 Quote
SteveShannon Posted January 7 Report Posted January 7 On 1/7/2025 at 4:10 PM, WRYZ926 said: Here is a good video about FCC enforcement. Granted the idiot deserves what he gets for interfering with firefighters trying to put out a forest fire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJZroDsXBrA Expand I remember reading about that shortly after it happened. Some articles include the fact that he’s a ham in the headline, but that had nothing to do with the fact that he was disrupting their communications on 151 MHz and attempting to redirect firefighting resources. I would have loved to see the interaction when the official drove over to his location and clarified things. I have absolutely no sympathy for this jerk. He’s the kind of guy that reflects poorly on all hams. WRYZ926, amaff, Hoppyjr and 4 others 7 Quote
WRYZ926 Posted January 7 Author Report Posted January 7 I totally agree and I am glad to see the FCC not reducing his fines. Guys like that make all of us look bad. Quote
Hoppyjr Posted January 7 Report Posted January 7 That guy is clearly an idiot and forgot a basic rule of life: stay in your lane. SteveShannon 1 Quote
SteveShannon Posted January 7 Report Posted January 7 On 1/7/2025 at 6:53 PM, 73blazer said: But they didn't take away his HAM license. Expand Are you sure? Quote
73blazer Posted January 7 Report Posted January 7 It wasn't in the order(s). And he's still listed in the FCC database with an active HV (Ham vanity) license. He didn't violate any HAM rules technically so that makes some sense I guess. SteveShannon 1 Quote
WRCZ387 Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 On 1/7/2025 at 4:21 PM, SteveShannon said: I remember reading about that shortly after it happened. Some articles include the fact that he’s a ham in the headline, but that had nothing to do with the fact that he was disrupting their communications on 151 MHz and attempting to redirect firefighting resources. I would have loved to see the interaction when the official drove over to his location and clarified things. I have absolutely no sympathy for this jerk. He’s the kind of guy that reflects poorly on all hams. Expand On 1/7/2025 at 4:31 PM, WRYZ926 said: I totally agree and I am glad to see the FCC not reducing his fines. Guys like that make all of us look bad. Expand For what it's worth, when I read violations like this, I don't paint all hams with the same brush, I blame only the violator, I know that others may not feel the same way, but personally, I blame only the bad apple, not the entire tree Just my .02 73 WRUU653, WRTC928, SteveShannon and 2 others 4 1 Quote
WRYZ926 Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 On 2/4/2025 at 12:58 AM, WRCZ387 said: For what it's worth, when I read violations like this, I don't paint all hams with the same brush, I blame only the violator, I know that others may not feel the same way, but personally, I blame only the bad apple, not the entire tree Just my .02 73 Expand I am the same way, I put the blame on the bad actor. Unfortunately it only takes sone bad apple to ruin the bushell. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.