Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I know that none of you will care, but I'm listening to the paid-for repeater tonight and this guy just keyed up, ID'ed himself as new to group, gave his tac number and callsign, and then asked for a radio check and then roger beep. I should mention that the club has a "no roger beep" rule on the repeater. A couple of seconds go by and this other guy keys up and gives him the appropriate feedback and signs off. Original guy keys back up and thanks other dude and then signs off. Roger beep. About ten seconds go by and this third guy comes on, completely unsolicited, and tells the guy to turn of his roger beep, there's no roger beeps allowed. You should know that if you're a member. Turn it off. A few seconds go by and new guy kerchunks the repeater and roger beeps again. I spit water all over my desk laughing. Carry on...
  3. As it turns out, yes, there is a way to do this. Retevis has a solution. I'm truly surprised.
  4. I lived there for awhile. Married a local girl and still have family in the area. It is kind of amazing to me that there isn't one. There's a large HAM community and when Hugo and Matthew hit, they were instrumental in getting help where it was needed. GMRS just has never taken off in the area. My father in law's best friend is a HAM and has a whole outbuilding dedicated to it. He thinks GMRS is a "toy" so, there's that.
  5. I also have a Gen 3 Tacoma. I should take photos. I mounted the mxta26 on an nmo mount attached to a bracket that mounts to the rear of the bed. I ran the coax under the lip of the bed and then through the drivers side pressure vent on the rear of the cab. Then down and under the panels on the door frame to the front of the cab, across under the drivers seat and to the radio. No holes were drilled, and the SWR is 1.01. My bed cover is a multiple section accordion folding type made of aluminum. I've seen a few other installations, but all required drilling holes. While I've done that with my Jeep I'm avoiding it on my other vehicles.
  6. Yesterday
  7. WRYT630

    IMG_0102.png

    Bullhead city AZ Rotary park at the river.
  8. Just for grins I got my power/swr meter out(same one I used to test power output in my videos)and checked the swr(unscientifically)and got anywhere from really good on some frequencies with some antennas to absolutely awful on some frequencies. Some antennas did great on MURS and 2M but totally sucked at 70cm. Many didn't do well at all on 1.25M but were passable on 2M and 70cm. Surprisingly the factory 8" and Abbree 771 were both accaptably on ALL tested frequencies. 2M, MURS, 1.25M, 70cm and GMRS. I guess the factory provided antennas aren't as bad as the old rubber duck antennas they use to provide. I'll probably give the 320a a test to see how it looks before I make up my mind one way or the other.
  9. I'm certainly and self-admittedly new to all of this, but I wasn't even aware that one could test the SWR of a handheld antenna. I'm running a Nagoya NA-771 on my 5 watt HT. I don't have any scientific data, but from a bit of practical testing, I have found that range is much improved over the OEM rubber ducky. I am roughly 40 miles - as the crow flies - from a local repeater and I hear it clear as a bell and have, on two occasions, hit it and gotten a response on that HT with the Nagoya NA-771. I suppose the stars were aligned just right because I have tried several times since and not had success. I was never able to hit it with the rubber ducky on.
  10. I watched an HRCC video last night and he talked about HAMRS. Thanks for the info. You mentioned "park to park." I've overheard Mike on Ham Tube Radio use that language to. The idea being that you aren't talking to a base station in someone's home? Helping activate from another park is preferable than getting a contact from someone at home? Is that the gist?
  11. I appreciate the sentiment, however this ole boy is done summiting. I spent the better part of my early 20's on the Appalachain Trail and a large portion before and after that climbing. I'm more looking for Beaches and Plains on the Air at this point.
  12. I would do a bit more research before sending it back. Checking the match on an HT antenna is a difficult exorcise. Lot's of ways to do it wrong and get crappy results. I've tried it myself and had trouble getting results that looked reasonable. Read the comments about antenna testing and what the guy observed. I did some simple tests using an older MFJ antenna analyzer. Check out the results for the Diamond SRH320A. The results for 2M are particularly weird. WGP - With Ground Plane WOGP - Without Ground plane. Then I ran some SWR sweeps of the SRH320A using my RigExpert AA-1000 antenna analyzer with a special MFJ magnet mount using an SMA connector for HT antennas. The mount was placed on a large 36 inch by 40 inch flat sheet metal sheet for a ground plane. https://mfjenterprises.com/products/mfj-332s?srsltid=AfmBOoq7AleI5bQc6eePGbJ4paGCA-ZK7sBSZWARn6VL0pTjEjIYgUTy https://old.rigexpert.com/products/antenna-analyzers/aa-1000/ Apparently, I assume, something else must be going on to get a good match on 2M when the antenna is on an HT, held in the hand and close to the body, that the testing I did does not duplicate. https://www.diamondantenna.net/srh320a.html HT-Antenna-Testing.pdf HT Antenna Tests Results.pdf Antenna Scan Results (SRH320A 1.25M GP).pdf Antenna Scan Results (SRH320A 2M GP).pdf Antenna Scan Results (SRH320A UHF GP).pdf
  13. This!! Testing the SWR of an HT antenna is impossible without very sofistikated equipment, OTHER than confirming that the antenna is not just a dead-short.
  14. This! Testing the SWR of a handheld radio antenna is either very tricky or useless, depending upon whom you listen to. Performance is what matters.
  15. I'd open it and test it. Results may vary.
  16. RG-8x seems to be pretty good especially if I keep it at 10 feet.
  17. Just watched a review on the 320a, the SWR was horrible especially on the 70cm band. I'll be sending it back without even opening it. Really disappointed that Nagoya would put out a product like this.
  18. The attached files are a couple of the simple Kenwood 2-pin plug, "K1" connector, worthy to look for. I've used the KMC-17 on some CCR radios and got good audio reports. The main issue with used mic's is the cord. The outer material has a tenancy to crack and peel off. If buying used look VERY carefully at the cord condition. KMC-17 Revised.pdf KMC-21.pdf
  19. That makes sense. I have the service manual for the -45. So far can't find one for the -45D. A few of the DMR radio recommended Kenwood mic's had a few extra ceramic cap's installed verses the non DMR recommended models. The really fancy one is the KMC-52D. That one has a full builtin DSP processor core, and it's own programming software. The big pit fall with the various digital voice modes is the CODEC is HIGHLY optimized for voice only. Things like wind noise, sirens etc. will bugger up the conversion from analog to digital. The DSP based speaker mic does all the filtering and noise cancellation in the mic itself before the audio is passed to the radio. By comparison the -45 is very simple. Just a mic element, speaker and some switches. KMC-45.pdf KMC-52D.pdf
  20. I have 2 of these. I have used these with a variety of antennas and the suction is secure- even at high speed. Rx/Tx are both outstanding. I needed a no holes/no damage mount for my car. If you search on here for HCCFCA you'll probably find it.
  21. Almost certainly. Ratings are usually conservative. Plus, you probably don’t transmit continuously for long periods of time.
  22. They are two separate logins, but once you’ve logged into both you should be okay.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.