Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/05/23 in all areas
-
What's missing from myGMRS.com?
kmcdonaugh and 3 others reacted to SteveShannon for a topic
I agree. I don’t want to be geocoded for any of my hobbies. However, a map showing GMRS clubs might be helpful.4 points -
Listening to the GMRS Net on line
WRUU653 and 2 others reacted to wayoverthere for a topic
3 points -
Baofeng Radios
fe2o3 and 2 others reacted to SteveShannon for a topic
They're inexpensive, but they seem to work to introduce folks to radio use. I would expect all of the negative characteristics you listed, but sometimes they work surprisingly well. I have no problem with folks who buy and use them and I have a couple UV5Rs myself that I bought to see what all the ruckus was. I also have some Yaesu handheld amateur radios and a Garmin GMRS radio that are better radios, but for the price difference they should be. The Baofengs desense when placed next to a transmitting radio. The Yaesus do not. I haven't tested power output on any of them.3 points -
I put it to you that anyone who compares a $20-$50 Baofeng to a radio that costs much more and expects it to perform like that radio that costs much more is the fool. Those are the people you need to watch out for.3 points
-
Isn't that what the radio is used for? ?3 points
-
3 points
-
Baofeng UV-9G & Nagoya NA-701G Antenna
back4more70 and 2 others reacted to SteveShannon for a question
Probably. Similarly, I have a good GMRS specific mobile antenna (Midland MXTA26) that is completely deaf on the 2 meter band. With it I cannot hear my friend down the street on 2 meter, even though he can hear me transmit, and even though my handheld, with a dual band antenna, can hear him. Edit: 3/24/23 - At 2meters the SWR for the MXTA26 is around 7:1 No wonder it doesn’t work ? That’s certainly not a knock against the Midland antenna. I bought it for GMRS.3 points -
SW 2300-26100 kHz radios on emergency radios
WRQH837 and 2 others reacted to SteveShannon for a question
Going back to your original question, the range of frequencies the Crane Skywave covers are those which allow you to listen to transmissions from around the world, given a good antenna system. They are the frequencies used by shortwave radio stations and ham radio operators which are best at long distances. They propagate worldwide, bouncing or skipping off layers within the atmosphere and the earth itself and when conditions are just right you should be able to listen to radio stations from around the world without any networking or repeaters. That specific range of frequencies is also called HF which stands for High Frequency. In the Amateur Radio world HF extends from 3 MHz to 30 MHz (3000 kHz to 30,000 kHz). VHF is 30 MHz to 300 MHz and UHF is 300 MHz to 3000 MHz (3 GHz). As frequencies get higher, they no longer bounce as well. They travel more in a straight line. This makes radios in the VHF and UHF ranges better for local communications, such as fire, police, and utility services. It also makes them better for communicating via satellites. If you wish to listen to those services, a true scanner, with the capability of listening to trunked and digital transmissions would be appropriate.3 points -
What's missing from myGMRS.com?
kmcdonaugh and one other reacted to gortex2 for a topic
No thanks. No need to know me or where I am in my opinion. GMRS for me is a utility and not a hang out to meet folks. They have websites for that.2 points -
Without getting into the debate on Part 90 vs 95 figured I'd list some basic Repeaters for UHF that would be good base units if your shopping for new. Low Power RT97 - List Price - $536 (Sale Price - $371.99) - https://www.retevis.com/rt97-portable-gmrs-repeater-mobile-repeater#A9150CX1 Midland MRX10 - List Price - $ 459.00 - https://midlandusa.com/products/midland-mxr10-repeater Mid Power Bridgecomm BCR-40U - List Price $1499.00 - https://www.bridgecomsystems.com/collections/amateur-radio-repeaters/products/bcr-40u ICOM FR6300H - List Price $1819.00 - https://theantennafarm.com/shop-by-categories/radios/repeater-systems/uhf-repeaters/11680-icom-fr6300h-detail Kenwood NXR-810K - List Price - $1770.00 - https://theantennafarm.com/shop-by-categories/radios/repeater-systems/uhf-repeaters/9640-kenwood-nxr-810k-detail Motorola SLR5700 - List Price $ 3700.00 - https://theantennafarm.com/shop-by-categories/radios/repeater-systems/uhf-repeaters/9581-motorola-slr5700-detail To be noted none of the mid power repeaters come with a duplexer. That will tac on another $300 and up depending on what you purchase. Granted there are many UHF part 90 repeaters used on the market that can be had for way less money than above but wanted to list new prices. If your searching online and someone is advertising a GR1225 on GMRS for $1000 I'd think twice. For mid power I have no experience with the Bridgecomm or the new NRX (however have many of the older Kenwood) units. Just wanted to put some info in one location. The low power units are nice because they basically work out of the box. I also realize the prices on the mid power units look high when your comparing to some of the CCR world but they will outlast pretty much all the home brewed stuff as they are built to do what they are. Some used older stuff that can be had reasonably are the Vertex VXR Series, Motorola GR1225, Motorola MTR2000, Motorola Quantar, Kenwood TKR850, Midland Base Tech II (Was a solid unit), ICOM FR4000 and the Motorola XPR series.1 point
-
Mounting base antenna in a tree
Sab02r reacted to SteveShannon for a question
There are literally thousands of hams who attach antennas to trees, but most of them are wire antennas. How you attach the antenna to the tree will determine whether it damages the tree. There are straps to minimize damage to the tree. Here's a link to a forum thread in another forum talking about this. One person said that TV reception suffered, but it's important to understand that TV signals are much wider band and more susceptible to problems than our analog voice signals. https://www.arboristsite.com/threads/antenna-mast-in-tree.198967/ I wouldn't hesitate to do it. If it doesn't work, then you look at your second choice.1 point -
Baofeng Radios
SteveShannon reacted to WRQC527 for a topic
One thing I noticed about the UV5R is that the one I bought back in around 2013 had better receive characteristics. The new one tends to drop out more with weaker signals. A Signal Stick antenna helps, but who wants to walk around with a 19" antenna on a 4" tall radio. I even re-wrote the squelch settings using the CHIRP service settings tab, which only helped a little.1 point -
After reviewing… I totally agree. This site is pretty excellent1 point
-
Listening to the GMRS Net on line
wayoverthere reacted to WRUJ495 for a topic
Thanks so much for taking the time to reply. Means a lot!1 point -
Baofeng Radios
SteveShannon reacted to WRUU653 for a topic
I have a few Wouxun radios and they're great but so is my Boefeng UV-9G and GT-3WP. They don't cost much and after dialing in the squelch they perform nicely. I don't have to worry about damaging an expensive radio if I take them hiking and I like that they have a little more pause time before continuing to scan in CO than my KG-935G Plus and quite frankly the battery fits tighter than my 935 as well. People here bag on Baofeng all day long but I have never gotten a complaint on the other end and they have their purpose. I can only speak to the two models I have but I would add that putting people down for having what they can afford because you can afford more doesn't make you better. Not that anyone here does that...1 point -
Baofeng Radios
Hoppyjr reacted to OffRoaderX for a topic
They are nothing but cheap Chinese junk! Anyone that uses one is not as smart as I am! ...just wanted to get that out of the way right up front.. I own several different model BoofWhangs and most of them offer great bang for the buck. Anyone that compares a $20-$50 Baofeng to a radio that costs much more (as done in this forum all the time) AND expects it to perform just as well is a fool and should be ignored.1 point -
What's missing from myGMRS.com?
SteveShannon reacted to wayoverthere for a topic
Agreed. I wouldn't be opposed to having something that gave users an opt-in basis though.1 point -
Baofeng UV-9G & Nagoya NA-701G Antenna
WRUU653 reacted to back4more70 for a question
I also have the 771G, it works well. So far, I like the smaller 701G for carrying, and the 771G for in home use.1 point -
SW 2300-26100 kHz radios on emergency radios
SteveShannon reacted to WRQH837 for a question
Hi Steve, Thanks for answering the original question in such a concise way! I've been reading a lot online and have found pieces of this information here and there. It's really nice to see it summarized. Now, I know why emergency radios have the bandwidth they have, and I also know what I need to do to listen to local emergency services. All of you here have helped a lot!1 point -
1 point
-
Baofeng UV-9G & Nagoya NA-701G Antenna
back4more70 reacted to WRUU653 for a question
I beleave you are correct in your assessment. It certainly makes sense that the GMRS tuned antenna is going to be less efficient in the VHF range than the stock duel band. Now that I have said that, I have done a side by side with two UV-9G radios comparing the receive of the stock antenna, the 771G and the 701G. The 771G was best overall however the 701G was almost as good and I felt it was better in the out of band UHF than the stock duel band and just as good receive on the VHF. No this didn't make any sense to me but that's where I landed. This was over a couple hours and I swapped antennas back and forth incase one radio was better than the other. I didn't have anything at 131 MHz but I do have some around 151 MHz. I don't recall if they came in as good but I did receive them. So the 701G has ended up being my go to. I like the shorter stance and it seems to work well and I wanted my TX to be as good as I could get for GMRS. As they say though YMMV.1 point -
New Radio Releases
CTHULHU reacted to MarkInTampa for a topic
1 point -
SW 2300-26100 kHz radios on emergency radios
SteveShannon reacted to WRUU653 for a question
@WRQH837 You may want to take a look at the Wouxun KG-UV9GX if you are interested in also using the radio to communicate on GMRS as well.1 point -
NEWBY
WRUU653 reacted to wayoverthere for a topic
1 point -
Midland MXR10 Repeater
kmcdonaugh reacted to wayoverthere for a topic
If it's the metal box that's the decider, the mygmrs shop has the rt97s in the metal case, rather than the 97 in plastic. https://shop.mygmrs.com/collections/repeaters-and-accessories/products/retevis-rt97s-portable-gmrs-repeater1 point -
New Radio Releases
MarkInTampa reacted to CTHULHU for a topic
1 point -
I used BCD235XLT for years, till all the law enforcement, fire, EMT, and even city comms in my area went to P25 Phase 2. I gave away this scanner, it was good, but a bit tedious to program: everything must be done from the front panel. It also had a NiMH battery pack, that was easy to replace. Just a few days ago I found a deal on ebay that I can't pass, for the BCD325P2 scanner, beaten up but working. These P25 scanners are expensive. It also a breeze to program from computer using regular mini-USB cable. The difference between scanner and regular HT is that scanner is scanning much faster, so less chance to miss communication, and a lot of them, even cheap ones, can also scan trunked systems1 point
-
Are GMRS repeaters required to identify every 15 minutes?
Radioguy7268 reacted to WRKC935 for a topic
Gonna stick something ELSE in here that I don't think has been covered. If you are on a LINKED repeater system, even if you are a repeater owner on the system, you have to identify. Reason is that your transmissions are not only coming out of your repeater, but other owners (call signs) repeaters as well. That being said, I don't know of any owners on the linked system that don't identify. So this isn't a ding on anyone I have ever heard or talked to. But it's worth mentioning for others. I see this being debated here and in several other threads. And I frankly don't understand why it's a big deal to identify. And thing for a second WHO it is that consistently DOESN'T identify. The clowns that are causing hate and discontent with their beeps and burps and other crap being jerks. So you are wanting to fall into that group and act that way? Not sure what your motivations is for that. Repeater ID requirements. What the regulations say has been covered, several times. What you choose to do on YOUR repeater is up to you if it's stand alone. If it's linked, it has to ID every 15 minutes. And you are better off to set the ID for 10 minutes so that if it's held off by traffic, it will still go out in time to be compliant.1 point -
Please excuse me but I feel I need to post something very controversial.... Girl Scout Cookies Peanut Butter Do-Si-Do's are the very best. Thin Mints are for ? There, I said it. Glad to have it off my chest.1 point
-
When you're there have you tried to monitor 446.0 to 446.2? That's the European PMR446 license free band there. Likely foreign visitors bring their PMR446 radios with them not realizing they're not legal here, and are in fact operating on the Ham 70cm band. They operate narrow band FM and or DMR! Some will do a mode called dPMR446, which is very similar to NXDN. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PMR446 https://kenwoodcommunications.co.uk/files/file/comms/uk/pmr446/PMR446-White-Paper-V6_18AUG2016_JT_KB.pdf1 point
-
Since I am in Douglas County, Washington I will also keep an eye on this thread. I did just find a GMRS repeater in East Wenatchee that is up that I requested to use.1 point