UncleYoda

@WRKY933 I can't tell you any more about detecting fakes than what is at those links I posted (the Nagoya page is linked from the kb6nu page also). If yours is junk (we can't tell from your lack of detail), then it's either a fake or a bad one due to the lack of sufficient quality control which the Chinese are famous for. That other stuff you referred to is not allowed in USA under FCC regs regardless of if the radio is capable of it. If you use that, people listening will be able to tell you're breaking the rules. Your signal can still be tracked.

https://www.kb6nu.com/fake-nagoya-antenna/ Authentic Nagoya NA-771G Handheld GMRS Antenna (15.3 Inch)

@LeoG I'm with you on how things should be, but I think Steve is closer to how it will be treated.

@Daedalus0101101 You seem to have it exactly backwards. Using a repeater from home is where the difference of opinion lies. A mobile in the car or a handheld with antenna attached directly to the radio (i.e. portable) are fine for repeater use.

I think it's goofy to say a base station is a control station when using a repeater. I don't know if the goofs are the ones interpreting it this way or the FCC for writing it like this. One thing I can point out with the wording is base station is not mentioned in the control station definition. My opinion is (1) a base station is a base station regardless of who you talk to, and (2) we can't resolve this ourselves to everyone's satisfaction - we need clarification from FCC.

I don't know if the team being assembled is up to the task, but the how is actually simple - stick to the Constitutionally delegated authority. If they did, FCC could only regulate Federal employees and Federal property.

@Hoppyjr that's what I was hoping for and hinting at in my Brendan Carr topic. If he doesn't improve the agency and regs it'll be disappointing. They made a big mistake letting digital take frequencies in the 2m ham band.

I'm not an engineer, never played one on TV. But connecting both wires from the radio to the battery with a fuse on the red wire has worked well for me. The only time I had a noise problem was with CB connected to the auxiliary cigarette-lighter type socket (is there a better name for those?). I have used other radios that way without a problem. (And this is on a Ram, V6, not much extra electronics just A/C and built-in AM/FM.)

It's DMR. Kind of what I expected. The links will be useful when I hear other junk.

Thanks, I'll bookmark that site because I can probably use it later. But none of those match what I'm focused on right now. The closest was MT63 but I've never heard of that.

Anyone know of recordings I could listen to (no videos) to identify the type of digital transmissions I'm hearing? The most annoying one is a fluttering static, but no squeaky modem noises. I'm curious about others too. This is data, not DTMF tones or anything similar (not CW either).

No, @LeoG that's not what it means. Messages are just information - there is no rule to stop that. In fact it is a standard part of emergency comms. Besides the example already given above, it does mean you can't have a conversation half on one service and half on another, as if I talk to you on 2m and you reply back on GMRS. (Short test messages like that are OK though.)

Forget the debate - you won't get much here that could be considered useful comments. And forget "national". Scale the idea back to your area first, then try to get it used statewide. I know this won't be satisfactory if you're traveling across the country, but it's a way to start that actually has some chance of working. Having a club that backs it would help but GMRS doesn't have many clubs like ham does. You could try to get CERT or some other organization to adopt it (local CERT here does direct traffic in emergencies so there is relevance). One thing that helps with all types of radio services is actually using it. People listen to and join in on channels/frequencies that have activity. So just do it.

If you want to transmit through the repeater, you need to use the repeater channel. Repeater input is on 467MHz. Repeater output and the corresponding simplex channels are on 462MHz. Yes, you are making it hard when it is really simple: use repeater channels for repeaters.

The channels function independently. The repeater channel has a 5MHz offset programmed in for the transmit frequency. So if both your display channels are set to the same receive frequency, the radio could receive on either one. If the repeater transmits an output tone, you can optionally set a receive tone to know when you're receiving from the repeater.

You could try Baofeng K5+ ... they seem very close and it is 10W tri-power, aircraft ban RX. I can't tell what if anything is different. The extra battery being sold for AR fits them both. It has 5RM as part of the ID #s on the inside back label. https://www.baofengradio.com/pages/download

I don't know who he is, but... President Trump Announces Brendan Carr as Chairman of the FCC: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/president-trump-announces-brendan-carr-as-chairman-fcc/

It has some issues you should be aware of. The BTWR owner would not post my review where I explained all this. When setting tones or just changing channels, holding down the arrow keys does not work to cycle through like it does on every other radio I have. Starting a scan takes 3 button presses instead of holding down one button. The channel numbers on the right are really small - I need high magnification glasses to read the chanel numbers. The extra info across the top is tiny too but that is less important usually than channel number. The mic port went bad on mine in less than a year. I usually listen on earphones with a mic button; the speaker port still works and I can still talk by using the PTT button as I would without the earphones. Not a big deal but I expected better quality from TYT since my 12 yr old UV5Rs never went bad. It does receive well, better than the newer UV5Rs which have somehow been modified to not pick up weak signals as well as the older ones did. Transmission sound is good too. I believe it's supposed to be good as far as harmonics but I can't test. One feature I like is the screen backlight can be set to stay on - I hate radios that go dark just to save battery power, I want to see that my radio is on and be able to glance at the screen. I leave mine on 3, the middle setting, brightest is too bright and dimmest is too dim. The battery eliminator which I got started having problems - somewhere inside or in the cord there is a loose connection. I use battery eliminators indoors whenever I can. Other people may not care. And I've only had this one so I don't know if it's a common problem. The battery release, on the bottom, is really hard for me to operate. It's a good, mostly well built HT. But overall I was not impressed enough to buy more. As it ships (AT LEAST WHEN I GOT MINE), VFO mode is locked out, which is ridiculous for a ham radio (but common in Part 90 radios). The key sequence for unlocking VFO is posted on the BTWR site.

REACT HQ would not even give me a contact for my state

We don't have one group hogging everything, but all the frequencies are in use or at least claimed except maybe the 550 (off-air but still listed). I'm not sure what the best choice is for the next one to be put up. Is that private 600 one ever used or are they just camping on the frequency?

Yes, the main reason given was the risks. It's a typical attitude for emergency management people; they think we're incapable of doing basic things everyone can do. A 911 dispatcher told me that same kind of thing - getting in the way or needing to be rescued - when I was a volunteer. But people don't need FEMA cousres, Red Cross courses, or an AUXCOMM approval to do basic shit that we've all done when needed. [There is possibly something much worse than this happening but it's not verifiable with reliable sources yet, so I prefer to hold off on discussing it. It isn't radio related anyway, but like always ham (and GMRS) operators could help spread the word when MSM doesn't cover it.]

Which repeater(s) do you monitor most? And later, if they're in range for me (Gilbert and Batesburg-Leesvile is not the best direction for me), it would help to get your callsign to know I'm talking to the right person - PM me that later if you are OK with that. Based on what I learned about Andy's location, it will be difficult for me to make contact with him. I'm not sure if I understood. Is that private VHF repeater you want to put up for SCSG and CERT a different effort from this GMRS repeater you're looking into? Would the GMRS repeater be open?

It would've been helpful to say that up front. Since you're down that low, there's nothing we can do to help. If you get to a high spot in that area, you'd probably be in range of 625 from high ground. And Hopkins 675 may line up well with the downstream river valley. Even 650 maybe, although it depends on exact line to the repeater. But from down in a hole, all you can do well is sky reflection, meaning HF ham.

A beam type directional antenna would be best if Gilbert is your main focus. "Yagi" is a common beam type but not the only one. A yagi for GMRS does not need to be big. I know guys in HOAs use attic antennas, but if performance is an issue, you want an outdoor antenna as high as you can manage (with good coax). Your numbers for elevation look off. Lake level full pool is 360. The sandhill ridge is around 500. You should be in between those.

I'll let him explain if he wants to. The details he's leaving out do matter. But he asked for a video to watch and that is different than asking for advice.