Voting notification

[UncleYoda]

Why do we not get notification, or a way to view, who up/down votes our posts in Tech Discussion?

[OffRoaderX]

Because that might lead to jealousy, anger, rage or violence ....

[UncleYoda]

And secret downvoting is better?

[SteveShannon]

14 minutes ago, UncleYoda said:

And secret downvoting is better?

And secret upvotes as well.

[WRYZ926]

Imagine the chaos if a certain person knew who keeps down voting all of his posts  As of now he can only point his finger at everyone on the forum.

[UncleYoda]

1 hour ago, WRYZ926 said:

Imagine the chaos

Isn't it chaos already when people's posts are being downvoted just because of who they are?  IMO, that violates the rules anyway.

[FishinGary]

3 hours ago, OffRoaderX said:

Because that might lead to jealousy, anger, rage or violence ....

On the internet? Surely, you jest. No one would ever do that... 

[SteveShannon]

21 minutes ago, FishinGary said:

On the internet? Surely, you jest. No one would ever do that... 

And certainly not in social media, the bastion of genteel behavior, patience, and selflessness. 

[WRYZ926]

1 hour ago, UncleYoda said:

Isn't it chaos already when people's posts are being downvoted just because of who they are?  IMO, that violates the rules anyway.

I won't argue that point. But when someone is always negative and/or hateful with every single reply then they are going to get down voted.

[SteveShannon]

3 hours ago, UncleYoda said:

Isn't it chaos already when people's posts are being downvoted just because of who they are?  IMO, that violates the rules anyway.

The only person well enough known to be upvoted or downvoted just because of “who they are” is Randy, and for the most part I don’t think many (if any) people have downvoted him because of that.

SoCalGMRS gets downvoted because of how he treats others, not because of who he is. If he stopped treating others that way the downvotes would quickly cease. 
It’s that simple. 

[WRUU653]

Other than the one negative person whom we all know which as @SteveShannon mentioned is not because of who they are but rather the stuff they say I don’t see down voting based on who someone is. Could it happen? Sure but someone would just up vote them back. It’s just a means to elevate the best technical answer. I do prefer reading things in chronological order though as it’s easier for context and it would be nice if you could make that a default setting.