WQAI363 Posted Saturday at 11:40 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:40 PM Offroaderx is absolutely right, FRS may sound as a better option than CB Radio but sounding good does not mean that it is so. One needs to comprehend the characteristics of each radio service and way the radio waves move through the atmosphere. FRS or GMRS simplex may be fine farms or indoor applications where VHF HI or VHF Low fails. I seriously doubt the FRS would be a replacement for CB radio. I guess if you in group in close proximity convoy it would ideal. But nothing like making call out for anyone who may know why I-95 is backed up 5 miles. You're not going random strangers to give you a heads up on FRS as it was on CB back in the day. Quote
GrouserPad Posted Sunday at 03:06 AM Report Posted Sunday at 03:06 AM On 6/13/2025 at 7:22 AM, WRCR724 said: How did you come about with this determination? Do you have a FM CB radio and monitor it for others operating in the FM mode? If so, then you would be someone using FM CB. Or did you conduct a survey and have the results published somewhere? I genuinely would like to know how you came to your conclusion because I know of three people who have a Cobra 25ltd in their dump trucks. FM CB. FM. He said no one used FM CB. and he would be correct. WRTC928 1 Quote
marcspaz Posted Sunday at 03:49 AM Report Posted Sunday at 03:49 AM I may have mentioned this earlier in the thread... but I think the FCC is 40 years too late in approving FM on CB. I'm glad a manufacturer stepped up and got the change made, but it's just too late. Quote
WRTC928 Posted Sunday at 02:28 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 02:28 PM 10 hours ago, marcspaz said: I may have mentioned this earlier in the thread... but I think the FCC is 40 years too late in approving FM on CB. I'm glad a manufacturer stepped up and got the change made, but it's just too late. I have read that manufacturers wanted it approved so they could sell the same units in the US and Europe. I have no idea if that's true, but it makes sense. If it's true, the manufacturers wouldn't care if the FM feature goes unused and US users would have no incentive to use it. Quote
WRCR724 Posted yesterday at 01:19 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:19 AM 22 hours ago, GrouserPad said: FM CB. FM. He said no one used FM CB. and he would be correct. And that's what I was talking about as well. Did you not see me mention FM in my post? Go back and read it again in case you missed it. And I also said that I know of three people who are using it in their dump trucks. So, someone (3 people actually) is using it. Quote
WRTC928 Posted 21 hours ago Author Report Posted 21 hours ago 12 hours ago, WRCR724 said: And that's what I was talking about as well. Did you not see me mention FM in my post? Go back and read it again in case you missed it. And I also said that I know of three people who are using it in their dump trucks. So, someone (3 people actually) is using it. As far as I can determine, exactly 3 people in the US use FM CB. Is that better? amaff 1 Quote
Lscott Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago On 6/14/2025 at 11:49 PM, marcspaz said: I may have mentioned this earlier in the thread... but I think the FCC is 40 years too late in approving FM on CB. I'm glad a manufacturer stepped up and got the change made, but it's just too late. At least on the official side. My buddy has his "export" mobile radio for 12/11/10 meters. He's run FM on 11M with a few people, and that's before the FCC allowed it. The question will it replace FRS. I think the answer is no. Why. The usage cases are different. People using FRS have short range communications requirements. The small size, radio plus antenna, fit in a shirt pocket or on a belt very easily. Anyone that's looked at some of the older "HT" style CB radio, well they're about the size of the old WWII walkies-talkies. The antennas for any reasonable radiation efficiency are ridiculously huge. These radios are not convenient to use. The retired cop in my radio coffee group tells us stories how the older Motorola radios were not liked that well. They were large, bulky and the officers complained about the antennas poking them in the armpits all the time with the radio on their utility belt. SteveShannon, AdmiralCochrane, marcspaz and 2 others 5 Quote
WRCR724 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, WRTC928 said: As far as I can determine, exactly 3 people in the US use FM CB. Is that better? Yes, thank you. Quote
WRTC928 Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago 8 hours ago, Lscott said: The retired cop in my radio coffee group tells us stories how the older Motorola radios were not liked that well. They were large, bulky and the officers complained about the antennas poking them in the armpits all the time with the radio on their utility belt. I was a police officer in the early 1980s and that's pretty much how we all felt, but we accepted it because there weren't any other options. Lscott 1 Quote
WSHH887 Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago In the early 70's the USAF fire department used Motorolas, MX330's (?). They were bulky and heavy but we had stubby antennas. One thing we found is they didn't like heat and water was death to them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.