All Activity
- Past hour
-
TerriKennedy reacted to a post in a topic: Can I use GMRS if i'm close to CANADA
- Today
-
I did get TX and RX on 902.200MHz with the 3" stubby. This guy also got 33cm/900MHz to work but the power out put HD got was very low. So, the RT-900 WILL do 33cm but not very well.
-
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
N4ZHG replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
Is there an actual NPRM on this? I have been looking for a copy of the petition, so if you know where one is available I would appreciate a link. -
N4ZHG joined the community
-
WRUU653 reacted to a post in a topic: Repeater network navigation
-
WRUU653 reacted to a post in a topic: Repeater network navigation
-
WRUU653 reacted to a post in a topic: Repeater network navigation
-
PDXYOTA reacted to a post in a topic: Roger Beep
-
WSIL781 joined the community
-
SteveShannon reacted to a post in a topic: TID H3 - H8 USERS UNITE
-
WSJS413 joined the community
-
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
SteveShannon replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
So license the repeaters only and have them report on usage. I’m kidding, mostly. But given the existence of FRS and the number of unlicensed people using full power ham radios without licenses on GMRS, the number of people licensed for GMRS isn’t close to an accurate tally of how many people use the service anyway. -
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
OffRoaderX replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
I used to have the same misguided feelings.. But I learned from my best friend Josh that licensing is the only way the FCCs has to know how many people are using the service.. So before they start giving away frequencies they will have an idea of how many people they are going to piss-off. -
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
SteveShannon replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
I’m being serious. I believe more people than not operate without a GMRS license, even though it’s against the rules. I don’t see an end to civilization. I doubt that requiring a license makes any real difference. Of the few of us who buy licenses only a tiny fraction ever read the rules so really, what is the point of requiring licenses? -
WSJB218 started following Equipment and gear
-
WSJB218 joined the community
-
Opens fine now. That one has different connectors than the classic UV-5R models
-
Just wanted to say I appreciate the input received. I suppose the best approach is the typical way we approach life, with a polite and respectful touch. I suppose at the end of the day I'm probably the one using GMRS as it's currently intended. I didn't go the ham route for a reason. As an aside and to wrap up my first post thread I thought I'd say a very broad thanks to the community here. As I continue to scrub through previous threads I'm learning an absolute ton with regards to equipment and practices. Cheers.
-
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
AdmiralCochrane replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
An open 300 watt repeater on the Ashton tower. Yeah, that's what I want ... -
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
nokones replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
I believe Telewave still has Lowband VHF duplexers with a minimum spacing of 600 KHz. -
50 years ago my father's CB did become remarkably clear for a while. Then he noticed he was replacing a lot of bulbs on his car. Luckily he caught it before the battery was cooked, the voltage regulator (old mechanical type) had gone up to about 18 volts.
-
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
UncleYoda replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
I'm not sure if you're being serious there. No government issued callsign needed anymore and it would be just like CB, The low power and short antennas keep FRS radio users in check. (We don't know how many people are using GMRS radios as FRS radios.) At least if it goes unlicensed I can convert all mine to ham if I want (GMRS antennas may not be too good for TX on 440 but will RX). -
How to Update DMR-1701 to Open GD77 on Windows 10 pro
WRUE951 replied to WSCN925's question in Technical Discussion
i have some issues with connecting my new DM32 and finding com ports with Winoows 11.. Sometimes it works sometimes nada and thats going through the process of confirming the Com Port as Steve suggested. The radios start to connect than fail before really getting startedd. I'm not having any issues at all on my Windows 10 Labtop.. Even tried unning the software in compatability mode on Windows 11 w/ no luck. For whatever reason, it will evently connect on 11 but takes several attempts sometimes -
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
WRUE951 replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
the only low band repeaters i knew of 'back in they day' were high on top of Mountain peaks and many counties had 3 or 4 in their networks that reached every inch of their boundaries. Than came UHF and many many more mountaintops and even parking garages. -
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
SteveShannon replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
Hi Adam, It’s nice to see you back on the forum. I think it’s worse on GMRS than it is for ham radio. I agree that it would continue if new GMRS frequencies were added, but I don’t think it’s because of the new frequencies; it’s just the way people are. Without implementing draconian enforcement I don’t foresee any change. Honestly, what would it hurt if GMRS became unlicensed? Best wishes! - Yesterday
-
WSJR465 joined the community
-
Ham Radio 2.0 Coverage of Low-band Channels for GMRS
WQAI363 replied to marcspaz's topic in General Discussion
The petition to add VHF Low Band to the General Mobile Radio Service sounds like a good idea. However, there will still be the same issues that currently see on GMRS. I'm talking about the unlicensed individuals, the ones who refuse to follow the FCC rules and regulations, especially, when it comes to licensing. Those same individuals think just because they can purchase radio without a license, they'll use it as they see fit. That happen all the time on the Amateur Radio Bands. I certainly don't want to see what happen under Regan, where the FCC dropped the licensing on 11m Citizen Band Radio Service -
WSET656 joined the community
-
Works fine for me on Windows 11. I'm not sure why I would want to see if it worked for me, but I did anyways and more than likely I probably won't do it again.
-
Visit www.nggmrs.org It's a GMRS group in North Georgia with 800+ members, and weekly lunch meetups all over the area from Chattanooga to Atlanta. They also have an active Facebook page and 2-3 nets a week. WRVR303 NGGMRS member Chattanooga 30
-
And, all FRS Part 95, subpart B Type-Accepted radios are defaulted with narrowband emissions. Also, the channels you have identified as FRS 1-8 are not FRS channels. Those channels are GMRS 467 MHz Main Channels (GMRS channels 23-30 or RP15-RP22) for transmitting directly through a repeater only and if you are a GMRS Licensee, you can transmit up to 50 watts. Non-licensees cannot transmit on these channels. The channels you have identified as FRS 9-14 are the 462 Interstitial channels and are known as FRS/GMRS channels 1-6. If you are a GMRS licensee you are only allowed 5-watts ERP otherwise only 2-watts ERP. You are missing the 462.7125 MHz interstitial channel known as FRS/GMRS channel 7. However, FRS type-accepted radios operate narrowband only on those channels, but as a GMRS licensee you can operate either wide or narrowband emissions.
-
Since, I have all my Saturday chores done, I decided to do a quick bench test. I don't have a 20-watt Mobile to test, but I do have a 25-watt Mobile and I highly doubt that 5-watts of RF output power would make a difference in any farz or much of a power draw. I used a Kenwood TK-880-1 UHF 25-Watt Mobile radio, Bird 43 that was recalibrated last year, EMC Corp 150-Watt 50 Ohm Power Terminator (Dummy Load), and a Powerwerx 30-amp variable power supply. My first test was with the voltage regulated at 12.9 volts. The stand-by power draw was .3 amp, the transmit power draw at 6.3 amps, and RF Output at 23 watts. At 13.8 Volts the stand-by power draw was .3 amp, the transmit power draw was at 6.6 amps, and the RF output was 26 watts. The voltage did not drop one iota That is .533 dBm difference in RF power levels and my Farz guesstimate for difference could probably be measured with a short tape measure or maybe a yard stick.
-
I've ordered 14 of the H3's so far and passed them out to family. I have 6 myself that I keep in the house. 2 are in constant use scanning. The other 4 in a go box. Out of those 14 two were bad and got replaced for free and they didn't ask for the old one back. I hung onto them thinking I could open them up and see if maybe I could find out why they were DOA. Well today I pulled one apart hoping for an easy find, like a bad solder joint to the antenna. No such luck and I couldn't get the screen removed to get at the screws underneath to remove the circuit board. So I started to put it back together and decided that the one I use all the time could benefit from a new keypad since mine is wearing out. So I swapped them out and now I have a brand new spanking keypad on the 1 1/2 year old radio.
-
Would not open for me last night on my iPad, but this morning it was working fine.
-
-
WRUE217 joined the community
-
WSHB693 joined the community
-
WRAF948 started following Grand Rapids Hamfest
-
Still having problems with this link; even on my Mac in addition to my iPhone. Is it just me? Do these work with the older style format: UV-5R, DM-5R and RD-5R?