Lscott
-
Posts
3560 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Classifieds
Posts posted by Lscott
-
-
1 minute ago, SvenMarbles said:
They're 50mw worst case scenario
You would be surprised how far 50mw will go. People talk to low earth orbit satellites on just 5 watts just fine for example. There is a reason why the FCC has emission limits. It might not bug you but it will somebody else and I can assure you they won’t consider it “in significant.”
-
9 minutes ago, WRXP381 said:
AND…. Even if that’s true, he did say gmrs compatible, who cares. I’d be very willing to be there are more non compliant radios in gmrs then compliant.
Some people do care.
One major issue with the UV-5R, at least the early models, they were noted for dirty transmitters. The joke was they were multi-band radios, i.e. you could talk on several bands all at the same time! Some people quit using them specifically because of that.
-
1 hour ago, VETCOMMS said:
Just curious if anyone can direct me to resources about LMR. I'm curious about cost of licensing as well as how others have gotten their LMR license, other than paying out the $$$ to the FCC.
There is a poster on this forum who just went through this. I hope he jumps in here and relates his experiences and some hints on saving you some frustration with the FCC.
-
6 hours ago, WSCG458 said:
I was given 2 BAOFENG UV-5R radios that the box said were GMRS compatible.
They are, but not legal to transmit with on GMRS. Of course that hasn’t stopped people from doing so. You can program them up for Ham, GMRS and commercial frequencies all just for monitoring as a cheap scanner just fine.
-
On 4/19/2024 at 6:42 AM, WRKC935 said:
That's the persona of HAM. Ham radio in at least some instances has been portrayed as nerdy. It's connected to big towers in the yard with big antenna's on top of them.
And the guy sitting there with headphones on and tapping away on a telegraph key. Many people seem to think Ham radio is all about Morse code. That’s usually the first thing I get asked if somebody is interested, do they have to pass a CW test.
-
4 hours ago, WRVT715 said:
Anyone have photos or other that may help? It's out of warranty, btw.
See attached file.
-
-
On 4/13/2024 at 1:44 PM, WRQC527 said:
Maybe you will too, maybe not. I was casually researching how many guns were sold by state, and this image of a fully-equipped member of the Delaware Militia, including a Baofeng with a high-capacity antenna, showed up under their statistics.
You see about the same thing at this site too. On this site the faces are blotted out to protect the guilty.
https://radiofreeq.wordpress.com/2016/01/19/militia-radio-frequencies/
-
3 hours ago, TechnoHam633 said:
Split tones which is a good idea too.
That’s sort of useless too. The only tone that matters is the one for transmit. Myself I never use a tone on receive. All my commercial radios can be programmed that way. So, in that case I couldn’t care less what tone was used on the output.
-
4 minutes ago, TechnoHam633 said:
Some of the older Kenwood gear will let you program "odds" or non standard tones for repeater use.
That only works to the extent you can keep the tones secret. The weakest link in any security method are the people. Sooner or later someone is going to tell a buddy what the odd tone is so they can talk. Then you’re done.
- Jaay, SteveShannon and WRXB215
-
2
-
1
-
4 hours ago, gortex2 said:
Motorola offered RAS on some of the repeaters and has been used with great success.
I believe that’s patented Motorola technology. In that case you’re limited to Motorola radios. I guess if it’s just for your family it’s likely no big deal. You can program the radios for them.
-
-
9 minutes ago, WRQC527 said:
Antenna theory is voodoo science if you ask me.
Not really. The ideas are fairly basic if you don't jump into the theory really deep. Doing some searching on the Internet one can find some sites that do a decent job of explaining the fundamentals. If you get into building and designing antennas a bit more knowledge is required.
-
On 4/13/2024 at 6:54 PM, WRQC527 said:
I would say that if you're this interested in linked repeaters, get your amateur radio technician license and play with linked repeaters to your heart's content. Amateurs have it figured out. I have some pretty strong opinions about linked GMRS repeaters.
Good recommendation.
The main issue with linked repeaters is when one is used the whole system is in use over a wide area making the additional repeaters rather useless. For example when two locals are talking, on their locally linked repeater, why would somebody 200 miles away care about their conversation when all they want is to contact their base station from across town using their locally linked repeater.
With many of the Ham repeaters, particularly the digital voice mode ones, have a way to either access the repeater and keep the communications local or address a remote repeater(s) specifically for a link.
-
10 minutes ago, WRQC527 said:
Because they've designed these radios to operate adequately in the hand of an operator
But you also see a lot of them hanging on the user's belt, in pockets and strapped to utility vests. Some even have provisions for sticking the antenna on the speaker microphone. Can't design for every usage condition.
-
1 hour ago, WRTZ750 said:
How do I keep people from scanning my personal repeater tones and gaining access?
Simple answer you can't can't.
Some people have toyed with the idea of using a single frequency "trunked" repeater where every radio has to be registered with the ESN, by using the internal Electronic Serial Number, to authorized access. As far as I know there isn't a way to change the radio's ESN.
The typical analog system is known as LTR, Logical Trunked Radio, and the variation using the radio's ESN called Passport.
Some people have bumped into used radios with the special Passport firmware loaded. When they try to reprogram the radio using the "normal" software the display shows SJ-180 and fails to load the code plug. I even had a used Kenwood TK-3180 HT with that firmware loaded. I managed to load the normal LTR firmware so I could use the regular radio programming software. I do have a copy of the special SJ-180 programming software too.
This is also fairly common on digital voice mode repeaters. The process to get a radio on one of those is a bit more complex requiring a "system key" file, licenses etc. just to program the radio. Normally with those radios you can't even read the radio without the system key file. There are hacked versions of the radio programming software out there that will read the radio and save the contents as a ".srv" service file without it. See attached screen shots of a used NXDN trunked radio I read with that software.
-
7 minutes ago, WRYZ926 said:
know some old curmudgeons say that digital modes aren't for real radio operators, but I ignore them.
You hear the same crap about CW too. If you can't "beep" at 25 WPM you're not a real Ham.
- WRQC527 and SteveShannon
-
2
-
I would be VERY careful taking a two-way radio to most countries. While it's "safer" to take Ham gear you can still run into issues. You get stopped for inspection the custom agent is going to ask a lot of questions about why you have it. Without proper documentation you might end up getting your radio confiscated on the spot. In some countries it's not even legal to "monitor" communications you're not licensed to use! One example is the UK.
https://www.monitoringtimes.com/html/mtlaws_may04.html
I wouldn't even consider taking a radio to Mexico. The police might think you're a cartel member. Any cartel member seeing your two-way radio might think you're an under cover cop or rival cartel member. Either way you could get shot.
- SteveShannon and WRXB215
-
2
-
54 minutes ago, GreggInFL said:
Probably 100' total.
You might want to consider up-sizing the coax to LMR-600 for that long length.
- SteveShannon, WRXB215, WRUU653 and 1 other
-
4
-
-
24 minutes ago, WRUW493 said:
Not sure why you would rule out roof pillars though???
They are going to be close to the antenna and in what is known as the "near field" so it couples into the driven element. That can booger up the impedance match, SWR issues, and the radiation pattern. It's not a guarantee you'll have problems but keeping the antenna away from from structures like that will at least avoid the potential for them. You read through the past comments over time here and you'll see this mentioned from various people.
- SteveShannon and WRUW493
-
2
-
On 4/5/2024 at 11:33 AM, WRZT411 said:
Also, is there a real difference between a 5/8 and a 1/2 wave antenna?
If you don't have a GOOD ground plane for a 5/8 wave antenna, they really need it, don't waste your money on one.
If it's a true 1/2 wave they don't need a ground plane so you can mount them just about anywhere so long as you keep it away from nearby vertical metal supports, like roof pillars.
-
50 minutes ago, WRUW493 said:
Same as above, plus: keep in mind that aluminum is non-ferrous, meaning that is actually repels magnetic fields. Sure it's thin, but there might be a risk of deteriorating the magnet if left on the aluminum long term. Consider a large steel washer below the magnet to "capture" the magnetic fields, then place that combo on the aluminum foil.
The aluminum foil won't hurt the magnet at all. Don't worry about it.
Sticking something magnetic on the back side of the foil the magnet can be attracted to is a good idea to hold the foil in place. The foil needs to be a rough square at lest 6 inches on a side or a circle about 12 inches in diameter. Put the magnet mount in the center.
- SteveShannon and WRXB215
-
2
-
19 minutes ago, Sshannon said:
Eventually you’ll have every combination of adapter
!
I can verify that.
https://forums.mygmrs.com/gallery/image/427-adapters-connectorsjpeg/?context=new
UV-5R radios
in Equipment Reviews
Posted
And here’s one that isn’t. Look it up.