Jump to content

Ian

Members
  • Posts

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Ian

  1. On 6/6/2021 at 8:54 PM, rdunajewski said:

    I have already looked into it, but there are no PTT signals anywhere inside. They use serial communications like I2C to command the radio IC to transmit, rather than use a logic signal. Without some serious, serious hacking, there's no way to add an ID board or external controller to these.

    However, I approached Retevis about this and they are making a version with an external connector on it. I have received the engineering samples and they work, although we may ask for some tweaks. Hoping to sell these on the store soon. We'll be able to sell an all-in-one linking bundle that is completely plug-n-play for the myGMRS Network.

    Really, if they added a dedicated jack for the off-the-shelf ID-o-Matic board, that'd solve like every single problem in one fell swoop.

  2. I routinely reach for Motorola Spirits of the two-channel two-watt variety, on Blue Dot and Green Dot.  I also have a bunch of Dakota Alert kit, with the intention of eventually installing some of their MURS Alert sensors, or at least transmitters.  (Modified, for example, to alert when the mailbox is opened -- all the better to keep an eye out for expensive deliveries!)

     

    I've also got a Radio Shack blue-green mobile unit, though I've yet to figure out a really elegant way to mount that in a modern truck's cab.  I kind of wish Midland or Cobra would build a handheld-control-head MURS unit, those things are so much easier to cleanly install.

  3. Sometimes you don't __need__ to know the difference.  I occasionally find it useful to hand someone a really stupid radio, and say something like "If you can't hear me on 20, try channel 28" 

     

    Perhaps hand them a radio with only three channels programmed -- half a watt, five watts, repeater input.  As far as a non-radio-person knows, they're just turning up the power…

     

    I've been half-seriously accused of "walmart ops" a few times, and such strategies (as well as handing people single-channel radios) definitely make it easier on nontechnical people.

     

    Sometimes, a little communication is good enough.

  4. This is the best use for a garage repeater I can come up with.

     

    Edited to add:  If you're trying to get __into__ a repeater, another option is a cross-band repeater that transmits on the repeater input channel.  Were it me, I'd use Motorola's DTR and DLR 900 MHz radios for the handheld terminals, since they can be set up with enough encryption to keep noobs and jammers out of your transmitter.  900 MHz digital is described to have excellent building penetration characteristics, so it should be able to find a path to your outdoor transmitter package without much trouble.

     

    If you're not trying to get into someone else's repeater but just want to get outside your house with enough power to get reception, you might consider the Retevis RT97.  It's a five-watt "lunchbox" repeater that can be set up outside; all you need is enough power to make it through / around the cinderblock to transmit successfully, however you're going to be relying on your handheld and its indoor antenna for all the reception involved, which is unfortunate.

     

    The DTR and DLR radios are (mostly) cross-compatible, albeit with some new features only existing in the DLR1020 and DLR1060.  However, the older DTR410 and DTR550 have removable antennas, which might be better suited to building a cross-band repeater.

     

    Were it me, I'd use a DTR550 in the repeater box, and a DLR1020 as a wireless speaker-mic to access the rooftop radio in your situation.  Alternately, you could consider the (discontinued) DTR410 on eBay, as it may (frequently) be cheaper than a new DLR1020 in spite of greater capabilities in a lot of ways.

     

    Yes, I have similar problems with running coax where I live.  :P

  5. First:  WELCOME!  Welcome to the forum, welcome to the hobby.

     

    Second:  The Midland magmount is disposable.  The environmental sealing around the magnet lasts about a year, then the magnet rusts and the thing falls apart.  

     

    Third:  What kind of car do you have?

     

    Fourth:  What do you mean by "clean install"?  Do you want it in-dash, or just screwed to it with a bracket?  Me, for example, I went for the MXT275 and a passthrough mount.  When done, it'll look utterly factory and stealth.  Other options I've considered was ripping out the stock head unit for a single-DIN unit with CarPlay, and a single-DIN two-way radio below it.  (None of the links constitute an endorsement, just an example.)

     

    Fifth:  Nagoya now makes an antenna specifically tuned for GMRS.  This may be your best bet.  (This is an endorsement)

  6. Ah, that makes more sense.

     

    I've gotten lucky with eBay, but I have a jonesing for early 90s Motorolas.  Tried branching out, but had trouble finding the correct variations of the Motorola Saber I wanted to convert to MURS and GMRS.

     

    If you're not picky, you can get a commercial radio that'll do what you want.  But if you are picky, it can be hit-or-miss.

     

    Gman, got any old Kenwoods?  I'm interested in branching out.  :)

  7. The Retevis RT76 is everything I hoped it would be, and no more.  This pleases me greatly.  What I wanted was a dumb-as-bricks radio I could hand to "limited users" (hereafter, "lusers") with little they could screw up but changing the channel unintentionally and turning the volume too low.  As a result, I am very fond of this radio.  It is … nearly perfect.  Side-button 1 is limited to "alarm" and there's no scan mode I can bind instead; disabling the ability to start transmitting an alarm tone (AKA "jamming signal") with an unintended button press is possible, but it doesn't let you bind a function you want in its place -- and indeed, there is no scan function.  This is the only thing separating this thing from perfection.

     

    The Retevis RT76P is… Not so pleasing.  The menu doesn't function as the manual describes, the menu won't let you change wide-narrow in spite of letting you select it; hitting the "confirm" button causes the radio to say "Canceled".  It has a scan function!  But you still can't reprogram SK1 to scan.  Until this thing gets a firmware update, it's hot garbage.  Feels like a Baofeng missing a few buttons, and with worse translation in the menus.  It looks like it had potential, but the potential was squandered.  Still don't regret purchasing it, though; I have a spare charger and battery for my RT76 which I love.  This one… I don't.  Avoid.

     

    Edit:  Just tried the programming software.  Instead of flashing the codeplug I just created (not compatible with RT76 codeplugs, natch; this thing has nothing internally in common with the RT76, I'm sure) it unlocked the 2M amateur band and changed the CTCSS on channel 1 to 2100 Hz.  This thing is in dire need of some day-1 DLC.  

     

    Edit:  As of February 2024, the most recent firmware for the RT76P (released quite a while ago, actually) is genuinely functional.  It works with the CPS, it works with CHIRP, and the menu on the front panel works as intended.  This has gone from a hard pass to a recommend for me.  The one remaining pain point is that the top side-key is not programmable, and is hard locked to setting the S-code and sending an alarm tone.  If anyone needs a cheap GMRS jammer, this thing here will do the deed…  S-code is like some kind of poor man's trunking system.  It'd be suitable for large worksites with a limited number of frequencies, but GMRS licensing is incompatible with those use-cases, so … this "feature" is still essentially useless.  

     

    What I'd like to see in the next firmware revision is the option to drop both functions from SK1.  This will open up SK2 for a monitor function, while still allowing you to activate both broadcast FM and weather radio modes, which are far more useful than the proprietary PTTID function.  In addition, if you want a PTTID function, Retevis, may I suggest something that uses either audible or modulated-CTCSS tones to broadcast the user's callsign in fast Morse?  

  8. Meh, if you must have a CCR get the Baofeng DM-V1, at least it has a detachable antenna and DMR capabilities which that one does not.

     

    For similar price you can buy used Kenwood/Icom/Motorola/Vertex radios with far better receivers than those CCRs... ask around...

     

    G.

    |If you have to ask around to find one, it's not adequately expendable.

  9. Has anyone used any of the Midland repeater capable gmrs radios with a repeater?  If so, how do they perform?

    I have.  They're ... adequate.  When I have coverage, it'll take the radio from one end of the island to the other, where simplex is completely out of the question.

  10. I dumped the original post because everyone here seemed to be committed to Part 90 equipment... So why have a thread that discusses Part 95E equipment??? Again, some of the same actors hijacked the thread and went on to promote the "Commercial" only mindset...

     

    So yep, I didn't just take my ball, I'll took the whole playground :)

    That's deeply rude to the people who weren't involved.

     

    … Especially to other fans of the MicroMobile series.  Love that handheld control head.

  11. Ham tech study guides go into this.

    VHF is worse than UHF; the 30-300 MHz region is more strongly absorbed by meat than UHF.  Put it dead center on your car roof, or up on your house roof, or god help us a tower, and your exposure plummets.  Don't do the silly and use a 25 watt handheld, and you're probably capable of ignoring RF hazards unless you try to lick a transmit antenna, the power levels we operate at.

    You don't have to get your ham ticket, but they've got some really good study guides that answer this question.

     

    Edit:  Barney Fife is smarter than he sounds, he's just shrill and annoying.  Listen for his literary references, he's quite well read.  High INT, medium-low WIS, lower CHA.

  12. Not really... These forums provide some laughs from time to time, and it's always the same actors.. Some call me a troll because I float some different ideas about the RF Spectrum... And as soon as I float something all the Nay Sayers come out of the woodwork. It's the same BULLS**T Mindset that said Ham Radio would become CB because of the No-Code License. Of course, they were wrong, there was an influx of some really nice people, it was refreshing and a lot nicer to hear decent people using the Spectrum instead of bunch of old crabs... 

     

    As far as the GMRS crowd goes, there's changes coming like or not, you all dodged a regulatory bullet in 2017, but you're almost out of lives :)

    I'm honestly a little annoyed you deleted the first post, because we're still having a discussion, and I missed the beginning.

     

    CB is useless and nobody operates (here) any more, ham has told me to get new friends with ham licenses, and all I wanted was a way to keep in touch with my nerd friends at ren faires with no cell coverage.  My weirdest requests here have been in service to this singular goal, too.  I just want to solve a boring practical problem.

     

    What the heck is this about dodging bullets and out of lives?  Be courteous and don't redact our history, please.

  13. Because idiots and interoperability.  People who know what's going on will just avoid the interstitials if they're dealing with inter-service stuff, but if you have to talk to someone with no idea about the technical details, it'd be nice in a pinch.

     

    I'd almost settle for Midlands being RX only on the interstitials, but ... almost.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.