Jump to content

OffRoaderX

Members
  • Posts

    1774
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    220

Reputation Activity

  1. Haha
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from marcspaz in Antenna Grounding Question   
  2. Haha
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from back4more70 in Antenna Grounding Question   
  3. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from kmcdonaugh in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    For most normal people, GMRS is not a hobby.
  4. Like
    OffRoaderX reacted to SteveShannon in UHF linear amplifier   
    That question has been asked a few times.  You would need to bypass the built in duplexer and replace it with a duplexer capable of withstanding the greater output power.  Technically it might be done, but practically it probably isn't worth it.  
  5. Haha
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from kmcdonaugh in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    Thank you.
  6. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRAC654 in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    For most normal people, GMRS is not a hobby.
  7. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRAC654 in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    Thank you.
  8. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from kmcdonaugh in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    I've been using LMR400 on my repeater for over a year-and-a-half and it has been plenty "good enough" for me and everyone in the several hundred square miles that the repeater covers.
    Is it as good as a multi-thousand dollar commercial-grade repeater installation?  NO
    Will the coax last forever? NO
    Does it work? YES
    Be wary of "some people" that love spending other people's money.
  9. Thanks
    OffRoaderX reacted to SteveShannon in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    He has (or will have) a repeater with an SO-239 connector.  He already has an antenna that has an SO-239 connector. He has LM-400 feedline that has PL-259 connectors that will mate directly to the antenna and repeater, no adapters needed.  In terms of loss through connectors, that’s the least he can make it, regardless of whether he uses hardline or anything else.  If he gets a jumper with N connectors on both ends he would have to add N to PL-259 adapters, which (using your numbers) would add 1 dB loss and negate the 0.75 dB difference (your numbers for the loss through 25’ of LM-400) in losses through the feedline. 
    But what are the losses through 1/2 “Commscope?  The losses per 100 ft (according to the Commscope website) are 2.342 dB or about 0.55 dB for 25 feet.  So, by using Commscope Superflex and two adapters, the losses are 0.56 + 0.50 +0.50 or 1.56 dB So now he’s 0.8 dB negative compared to using what he already has.  
    Yes, he might decide that he doesn’t have the coverage he wants and decide to buy an antenna with more gain.  He still has that as an option. 
    “But I digress I keep forgetting the hobby is about doing it as cheap as possible as hams do in this new age.” 
    Way to lash out at both hams and those who have already stated they don’t have deep pockets.  
  10. Thanks
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from TavisB in We need more GMRS Repeaters Deployed   
    You (and everyone) is welcome to join our National Net via Zello, every Thursday night at 7PM (Pacific).. No Facebook, no dues, no fees, no mandatory meetings.  See how here:  https://www.notarubicon.com/zello-gmrs-repeater/
  11. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from goodoz in What was your LEAST favorite radio for GMRS you wasted money buying?   
    yah... About that......
  12. Thanks
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRQJ683 in Baofeng 9r programming   
    It sounds like your computer is incorrectly trying to open the compressed (.zip or .rar) file with Adobe.  Try to manually open the file with your Unzipping program, or look up how to change the association between whatever file type it is and Adobe.
    Also - for clarification - you dont need "the driver", you need the programming software.
  13. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRAC654 in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    I've been using LMR400 on my repeater for over a year-and-a-half and it has been plenty "good enough" for me and everyone in the several hundred square miles that the repeater covers.
    Is it as good as a multi-thousand dollar commercial-grade repeater installation?  NO
    Will the coax last forever? NO
    Does it work? YES
    Be wary of "some people" that love spending other people's money.
  14. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from fe2o3 in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    I've been using LMR400 on my repeater for over a year-and-a-half and it has been plenty "good enough" for me and everyone in the several hundred square miles that the repeater covers.
    Is it as good as a multi-thousand dollar commercial-grade repeater installation?  NO
    Will the coax last forever? NO
    Does it work? YES
    Be wary of "some people" that love spending other people's money.
  15. Thanks
    OffRoaderX reacted to SteveShannon in Retevis RT97S Repeater and RF Power Amplifier   
    TNRonin,
    Youre getting good advice from radio professionals about the best antennas and feed line. That’s great if you really want the best. If that’s the case simply ignore the rest of this post. 
    If you’re still reading you might be a hobbyist who’s just interested in “good enough“ and the financial savings that implies. 
    You already have LM400 feedline. 
    I think you already have a J-pole. 
    A short run of LM400 will have nearly no discernible incremental losses compared to hardline. Just make sure you seal the connectors against moisture. 
    A better antenna will make a difference, but how much is that worth to you?  
    Hook up what you have and try it. It won’t cost you anything but your time and I guarantee you’ll learn from the experience. Then, if it doesn’t work like you want, you can always try a different antenna (or perhaps raising the j-pole). You can always upgrade the feed line as well. 
    I would hate to see your enjoyment of the hobby diminished because you’ve been convinced that what you have isn’t good enough when the actual incremental improvement is only measurable to professionals. 
    Don’t let the best stand in the way of the good enough. Lots of people use LM400 and j-poles with inexpensive repeaters and do just fine. In the end elevation and location are the most important factors and all the money you have cannot overcome that. 
     
  16. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from DeoVindice in MDC signalling on GMRS.   
    According to the FCC Enforcement Database, since 2012, there are no ramifications.
    Unintended consequences include more "pure" spectrum-use since virtually every LMR radio is better designed and has far less spurious output than pretty-much any consumer GMRS radio on the market.
  17. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from Sab02r in GMRS Enforcement   
    It doesnt matter, and only the hall-monitors care - as you can see very clearly in this and other online forums..
  18. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from DeoVindice in MDC signalling on GMRS.   
    Everyone in our GMRS group uses MDC so we know who is talking and/or what radio they are on.
  19. Thanks
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRND441 in Don't be an idiot   
    This is ideology is a result of the constant barrage of ham radio operators acting like snobs, idiots, and whatever (take your pick) in online forums every day seemingly doing their best to chase away newcomers to the hobby.  And yes, GMRS users also do this, but strangely, many of them also have ham callsigns listed on their forum signatures.
  20. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRUK284 in Repeater frequencies   
    He is correct though, it would be easier to help if we knew what radio the guy was using.. And I prefer his direct and to-the-point replies to the 5-10 paragraph uncecessarily-complicated answers that always include a full resume of the person leaving the reply as well as a list of all the radios they own.
    I guess we all have different want/needs in forum replies..
  21. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRDV967 in Roger beep settings   
    My radio, my choice.
  22. Haha
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from Jekking00 in Roger beep settings   
    I have looked myself (at the last 10 years of enforcement), thats why I dont trust what you're saying.
  23. Haha
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from WRDV967 in Roger beep settings   
    Not that I dont trust you, or think you're making stuff up out of thin air, but i would love for you to share some actual facts about all these others this has happened to.  Perhaps a link to the FCC enforcement database entry?  Because as I'm sure you know, every time the FCC breathes down anyones neck, for any reason, by law, the FCC must publish that enforcement.
  24. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from Reloader762 in Roger beep settings   
    I keep my Roger Beep on - when someone complains about it, I remind them that its my radio and nobody is forcing them to listen to me.
  25. Like
    OffRoaderX got a reaction from gearjunkie in GMRS Enforcement   
    If you look close, 99% of them are actually sad-hams, disguised as GMRS operators.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.