WRQC527

I personally know two people who use their business addresses on FCC records. At least they're reasonably sure no one will show up at their house. I agree though, the FCC posting your street address with your license isn't the best idea.

I've been using my 25-year-old old (inherited) MFJ-259 that does up to about 170 mhz for HFand VHF. For VHF and UHF I use my Diamond SX-40C. I also have a NanoVNA, but I've found that it reads a little higher than my other devices. It has its place though and I use it often. And in fact, when we were at my repeater site last month, my friend's Comet analyzer was useless. It was so affected by all the RF from the dozens of repeaters at the site that we couldn't get any decent readings. My Diamond meter worked just fine. Sometimes simple is what is needed.

You seem angry. I think you need some alone time.

But it was me who quoted the words "victimless crime" and said there's no such thing as a victimless crime. Thus agreeing with you.

That escalated quickly. I'm not sure what you're so fired up about.

There's no such thing.

I think you should be able to set it up on a per-channel basis. I have a pair of Baofeng UV-82s that I set up with two channels. One channel has PTT-ID, one doesn't. I set them up in CHIRP within the channel settings. I wouldn't be so bold as to say this is how all radios with PTT-ID work, but that's my experience.

I live in a condo where I can't set up a permanent antenna, but I set up my very simple homebrew ground-mounted HF antenna on the common area grass outside my condo similar to a Wolf River Coil setup. I normally do 10-40 meters. I've got some decent DX contacts and a lot of contacts in Canada and the U.S. I just can't leave it set up. The neighbors sometimes ask but they all think it's pretty cool.

Technically, hams shouldn't respond to folks transmitting without identifying with a valid call sign if they know a person is unlicensed. The reason being that they would be violating FCC regulations the same as the person transmitting. That said, the FCC probably isn't going to do anything about it unless they get complaints. But there are self-proclaimed amateur radio enforcers who will berate and otherwise confront folks transmitting without a license. Personally, my life has no room for such things, and it's easier to ignore them.

I have a 35 Ah AGM battery powering my base station (Amateur HF/VHF/UHF and GMRS) that sits on a 4 amp battery charger/maintainer 24/7. I have a pair of solar panels worth about 15 watts that will keep it charged if needed. All of the components came from Harbor Freight.

Set one channel with both. Report back with your findings. Also, maybe no one is listening.

Cuss all you want. I've made and broken my new years resolution to stop cussing more times than I can *#$%ing count. This year included. But... there are many of us here who are both amateur radio and GMRS license holders who are more than willing to help where we can, with no animosity toward either radio service... unless... you throw us under the bus and lump us in to some "all hams are asshats" category. You will find both GMRS and amateur radio asshats here. But not all of us.

Two days in to the new year and GMRS is already fighting with amateur radio.

If it's this one, it makes sense that it's giving you high SWR readings. While it says it's compatible with all these different radios and frequencies, the truth is that it would be a Modern Marvel like you would see on The Discovery Channel if an antenna really did cover all those frequencies without being cut or otherwise adjusted. It also specifically says ham radio dual band, which alone makes it sort of incompatible with GMRS. Since ham radio UHF frequencies fall into the 420-450 Mhz range, while GMRS is in the 462-467 Mhz range, it's tough to get an antenna to resonate on both GMRS and ham frequencies. https://www.amazon.com/Bingfu-Antenna-136-174MHz-400-520MHz-Magnetic/dp/B08TGZN9ZG

Can you tell us exactly what Bingfu antenna? (Link to it if possible.) SWR readings of 5.6 and 2.59 are way too high, even for a somewhat inaccurate meter. (Although it is possible your meter is defective.) Normally you get those kind of high readings with damaged coax, loose connections, defective antennas, the wrong antenna, bad or non-existent grounding, that kind of thing.

I'm no Jimmy The Greek, but the odds are definitely not in your favor.

I seriously doubt it. It's written by a ham. Hams are notorious for having zero sense of humor. In fact, "Hams have a sense of humor" is one of the true or false questions I answered on my Technician exam.

I can honestly say that as a GMRS and ham radio license holder, I want exactly no part of this proposal to ever see the light of day. The FCC has already made a mess of the FRS/GMRS portion of the UHF band, and is contemplating even more mayhem with Midland's digital nonsense. Also, us hams have enough work to do already, what with posting reams of FCC regulations, technical service bulletins and doctoral dissertations for simple questions like "How do I ID" on MyGMRS. We can't be expected to police GMRS+ too.

As soon as I say no, someone here will spend the rest of the week trying to prove me wrong, so I'll say most likely no, even though there is no mobile GMRS transceiver that I've ever heard of that receives CB. Also, since there's no special regulations in Canada for CB use, you might have better luck with CB. Truckers tend to communicate road conditions with each other via CB, at least in my experience. Especially when the weather turns nasty.

Commenting about this on MyGMRS is meaningless. Commenting to the FCC during the FCC's 30-day window inviting public comment is probably the better use of time.

The only reviews I read anywhere are the bad reviews. The good reviews are too often either paid for or written by folks praising the product after owning it for an hour for doing what it's supposed to do. The bad reviews are honest.

Give your call sign, your name, and your location. If you're mobile at the time, say that too. If it were me, I would say "WRQC527 Steve in Fullerton California". Or "mobile in Fullerton California" if that were the case. But if I'm not at home in Fullerton, I would say where I currently am.

If you're getting a squelch tail and a courtesy tone then yes you have it set right. Say your call sign and that you're listening, and perhaps ask for a signal report. Perhaps someone is monitoring and will give you a response.

Indeed you have. Welcome, merry Christmas, happy new year!