Jump to content

Surecom SW-102... more like Unsuretrash...


gman1971

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, WROZ250 said:

Dunno, personally I prefer the analog meter movement over digital.  I suppose it could be argued that digital is easier to read, etc...  However, and especially when aligning at transmitter (yeah, I realize that isn't common in this hobby), it's a lot easier to see a peak with an analog meter than with digital (unless one is talking about lab quality, but even then...).

 

I have a analog Swan power meter that I use for measuring peak AM/SSB power, upto 3,000w.  It has a capacitive circuit that holds the peak and slowly drains off.  That is the only meter I use for tuning my radios or amps.  I use the Bird for legit engineering, bench testing and repairs.  I only use my Diamond and Surecom meters for monitoring low power FM power and SWR for day-to-day use. 

 

I'll make you laugh... I almost never use the Surecom unless I am looking for a "Wow!" factor for people who are new or know almost nothing about radio.  People love stuff that lights up!  LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, marcspaz said:

 

I have a analog Swan power meter that I use for measuring peak AM/SSB power, upto 3,000w.  It has a capacitive circuit that holds the peak and slowly drains off.  That is the only meter I use for tuning my radios or amps.  I use the Bird for legit engineering, bench testing and repairs.  I only use my Diamond and Surecom meters for monitoring low power FM power and SWR for day-to-day use. 

 

I'll make you laugh... I almost never use the Surecom unless I am looking for a "Wow!" factor for people who are new or know almost nothing about radio.  People love stuff that lights up!  LOL

Maybe you need the one I just sent back.. like someone said, it will boost your ego LOL......

 

G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WROZ250 said:

Dunno, personally I prefer the analog meter movement over digital.  I suppose it could be argued that digital is easier to read, etc...  However, and especially when aligning at transmitter (yeah, I realize that isn't common in this hobby), it's a lot easier to see a peak with an analog meter than with digital (unless one is talking about lab quality, but even then...).

At the end of the day, all you really need care about is accuracy.  Even that term (accuracy) is a debatable statement, as 'accuracy' depends on the manufacturer's reference.  The common reference, at least for analog based meters, is n% accuracy at a full scale reading. 

Unfortunately, that does not equate to mid scale (or quarter or three quarter scale) accuracy of the same percent, so you need to verify/calibrate your meter.  BTW, I include Bird meters in that statement, although I seem to recall the back of meter (the 43 anyway) having some kind of calibration chart/scale (it's been a while since I had the luxury of using one).

Who knows what it is for a digital meter, so you have to hope for and read the specifications (if they exist) and, as with an analog meter, calibrate it.

I think a lot of people would love to have any of the Bird meters (they have an excellent reputation), but realistically, they are out of the financial budget of the average hobbyist.  Don't even get me started on collecting the plug in elements.  Indeed, the basic Bird43 costs more than most high end GMRS radios!

A quality dummy load probably is a good idea as well, as all dummy loads are not created equal.  Even a Bird coupled/calibrated against a bad load reference will be inaccurate.

Bottom line, buy the meter you can afford with the best reputation (in it's price range) and, if you're a 'watt counter' do some testing to discover any discrepancies in the meter or variances in readings across a given range.

Just one opinion (based on years of experience)... 

Some of the Birds have a Forward/Reflected chart that can be adhered to the back for SWR. Nothing on the back of mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.