Jump to content

Sorting by votes ...


UncleYoda

Recommended Posts

Yeah, you gotta do a dance of getting to the OP post, selecting by date, then navigate to the recent posts.

To me its a solution that was looking for a problem to be added to newer forum front ends, but it is what it is.

Edited by WRXR255
Grammer - im on beer #2 so was needed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WRXR255 said:

Yeah, you gotta do a dance of getting to the OP post, selecting by date, then navigate to the recent posts.

To me its a solution that was looking for a problem to be added to newer forum front ends, but it is what it is.

I agree. The current default sort by votes is IMO asinine as it makes following the thread extremely difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, UncleYoda said:

as in Technical Discussion, is dumb.  We see replies before the posts they're replying to.  Not everyone replying is directly replying to the OP.

No, the question is always on top. 
Second, as I understand it, people ask technical questions hoping to get an accurate answer and they benefit from having the most nearly correct answer voted to the top. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveShannon said:

No, the question is always on top. 
Second, as I understand it, people ask technical questions hoping to get an accurate answer and they benefit from having the most nearly correct answer voted to the top. 

 

Right, but almost no one uses the votes, and it almost always turns into an actual discussion, where having them ordered by 'validity' is not really helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the idea of the voted answer being on top just below the question is it's HOPEFULLY the most correct answer.  The idea behind that is again HOPEFULLY someone will search for the question they have and if someone else has already ask it, which is typically the case. It will talke them to the question where someone else ask it and then give them the answer.  Last HOPEFULLY, that will fill their request with out asking the same stuff over and over.  But that is almost as rare as people getting their posts voted up the list.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SteveShannon said:

No, the question is always on top. 
Second, as I understand it, people ask technical questions hoping to get an accurate answer and they benefit from having the most nearly correct answer voted to the top. 

I didn't say anything about the OP not being on top.  But replies to replies do drift from the original post.

 

I've never seen a forum category handled this way and IMO there is little to no benefit to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UncleYoda said:

I didn't say anything about the OP not being on top.  But replies to replies do drift from the original post.

 

I've never seen a forum category handled this way and IMO there is little to no benefit to it.

 

There are a lot of technical forums were they offer this service.  A user posts a question to a problem and the correct answer (the one used to resolve the problem) gets voted as the correct answer and moved just below the question post. It's very common. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, UncleYoda said:

as in Technical Discussion, is dumb.  We see replies before the posts they're replying to.  Not everyone replying is directly replying to the OP.

Sorting by votes often gets weaponized, if you will. I've seen it quite often. Some people post things that are so off-topic, so irritating, or so irrelevant that they get down-voted to the bottom of the pile. Or they're just so universally disliked that anything they post gets down-voted. It's sort of a passive-aggressive way to fight back anonymously. It's the MyGMRS equivalent of getting voted off the island.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mostly agree, but I do not see the off-topic or irritating (especially useless wisecracks) getting voted down or ganged-up on in the sections that don't have voting.  I hate all the BS that is allowed to be posted here.  It makes this site just a playground for the forum regulars and drives other people away.  But I'm putting them all on ignore (only works though if logged in).  I really don't need this forum anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UncleYoda said:

I do not see the off-topic or irritating (especially useless wisecracks) getting voted down or ganged-up on in the sections that don't have voting. 

Mayhaps that's because there is no voting in those sections. And yes, there is ganging up on some folks in sections that don't have voting. Just recently there was some hillbilly who came in here ranting about how he wasn't interested in following any FCC rules. He pretty quickly went away because he was ganged up on, in addition to being thrown out of his repeater club after 48 hours and ending up on a number of ignore user lists here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OffRoaderX said:

We prefer the term "Geographically-challenged rural lifestyle enthusiast".

thank you for your understanding and compassion.

Thanks Jethro, I'll make a note of it.

By the way, do you know how we know toothpaste was invented by geographically-challenged rural lifestyle enthusiasts? Because otherwise it would be called teethpaste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.