SteveShannon Posted Monday at 03:24 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:24 PM This page in the fcc website explains the rationale they expressed when clarifying their rules: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-divisions/mobility-division/general-mobile-radio-service-gmrs Most notably, the language here (any other network) would seem to indicate that the FCC would not approve this scheme either: A GMRS user can expect a communications range of one to twenty-five miles depending on station class, terrain, and repeater use. GMRS stations cannot be interconnected with the public switched telephone network or any other network for the purpose of carrying GMRS communications, but these networks can be used for remote control of repeater stations. dosw, WRUU653 and Jaay 1 2 Quote
Lscott Posted Monday at 03:26 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:26 PM International Coverage of your GMRS Repeater This isn't going to happen simply due to the fact that the frequencies used by the GMRS service is specific to the USA only. Even the Canadians don't have access to repeaters, much less to the frequencies they use. Other areas of the world are covered by PMR446 or the various flavors of dPMR446. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PMR446 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_private_mobile_radio And for places that doesn't apply you'll find things like UHF CB radio. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UHF_CB There are a bunch of lesser known licensed/unlicensed radio service in other areas. For example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KDR_444 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet_(radio) dosw and Jaay 1 1 Quote
dosw Posted Monday at 03:45 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:45 PM I've re-read the FCC Part 95 Subpart E language several times over. I've watched the video twice. I've re-read the FCC language, and followed all the references in Subpart E through to the other documents they refer to. And still I don't see any new information here that would change my mind that the FCC has explicitly disallowed what the video is claiming to be legal. SteveShannon 1 Quote
SteveShannon Posted Monday at 04:20 PM Report Posted Monday at 04:20 PM 27 minutes ago, dosw said: I've re-read the FCC Part 95 Subpart E language several times over. I've watched the video twice. I've re-read the FCC language, and followed all the references in Subpart E through to the other documents they refer to. And still I don't see any new information here that would change my mind that the FCC has explicitly disallowed what the video is claiming to be legal. I agree. Clearly the FCC doesn’t approve of carrying GMRS communications on the telephone network or any other network. Yet that’s exactly what this does. Cogent would need to produce a letter from the fcc saying that it’s okay to connect GMRS repeaters in this manner before I would consider it. Jaay and dosw 1 1 Quote
WRUE951 Posted Monday at 05:49 PM Report Posted Monday at 05:49 PM Bold statement claiming the use would be legal by FCC. He better go back and read the FCC's latest interpretation of using GMRS over the internet SteveShannon, WRUU653, Jaay and 1 other 4 Quote
BoxCar Posted Monday at 05:51 PM Report Posted Monday at 05:51 PM Cogent just wants people to purchase equipment through them for the revenue. The Commission has made their position clear in that GMRS repeaters are not to be interconnected for carrying conversations. The spectrum assigned to FRS/GMRS in the Commission's jurisdiction isn't large enough to support linked repeaters without causing undue interference to other users. dosw and Jaay 1 1 Quote
AdmiralCochrane Posted Monday at 09:07 PM Report Posted Monday at 09:07 PM He's not connecting repeaters, he's bridging GMRS to LTE Quote
SteveShannon Posted Monday at 09:18 PM Report Posted Monday at 09:18 PM 11 minutes ago, AdmiralCochrane said: He's not connecting repeaters, he's bridging GMRS to LTE Correct, but that requires putting GMRS communications onto a network, which is what is prohibited. dosw, CaptainSarcastic, WRUE951 and 1 other 2 2 Quote
TDM827 Posted Monday at 09:28 PM Report Posted Monday at 09:28 PM I think if someone who both fully understands the engineering and FCC regulations found a legal solution for GMRS linking, it would have happened by now. dosw, WRHS218 and SteveShannon 2 1 Quote
LeoG Posted Monday at 09:42 PM Report Posted Monday at 09:42 PM How about no thank you. The frequencies can get pretty busy in some areas and all you need is one yahoo jabber jawing for hours on end to destroy a whole bandwidth. WRHS218, WRUU653, WRUE951 and 1 other 3 1 Quote
WRUU653 Posted Monday at 09:59 PM Report Posted Monday at 09:59 PM dosw, CaptainSarcastic, WRHS218 and 1 other 1 3 Quote
WRUE951 Posted yesterday at 12:35 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:35 AM 2 hours ago, LeoG said: How about no thank you. The frequencies can get pretty busy in some areas and all you need is one yahoo jabber jawing for hours on end to destroy a whole bandwidth. already that way in the bigger cities. Some areas like Los Angless, Phoenix, Dallas is nothing but a jungle. Pretty bad.. Quote
CaptainSarcastic Posted yesterday at 01:06 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:06 AM Popcorn!!! Get yer popcorrrrnnnnn!! WRUU653 and SteveShannon 2 Quote
SteveShannon Posted yesterday at 01:52 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:52 AM 46 minutes ago, CaptainSarcastic said: Popcorn!!! Get yer popcorrrrnnnnn!! Funny, the song “Let’s all go to the lobby” popped into my head. CaptainSarcastic and WRUU653 2 Quote
WRUU653 Posted yesterday at 03:24 AM Report Posted yesterday at 03:24 AM 1 hour ago, SteveShannon said: Funny, the song “Let’s all go to the lobby” popped into my head. How could it not SteveShannon 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.