Jump to content

gman1971

Members
  • Posts

    1079
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    37

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    gman1971 reacted to marcspaz in Why did you get into GMRS   
    Here's the thing, for some of us, its entertainment or emergency communications.
     
    However, my family use our radios around the house while working in the yard, while racing my car to talk to my corner spotters and crew from the track, while fishing, 4wheeling, hiking, spending time at the park, caravaning somewhere with multiple vehicles, and on and on.
     
    The list of things in our lives that we can integrate radio for the better is endless. Therefore the "image" to draw people in are endless. The best way to advertise isn't with someone specific to radio or activities you can improve with radio, but rather, find a common image that will have the most amount of impact on the heartstrings of your target demographic. The radio really has nothing to do with it. People buy toys and non-essential products based on emotions, using how they feel to justify spending the time, money and effort.
     
    That is... if that's really what the end goal is. If you're trying to sell radios, learn your target demographic. Asking folks like us is going to be a mixed bag of tricks that's just going to cloud that even more.
  2. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from berkinet in Impressed with CCR's   
    Back... haven't checked regularly in a while... sorry about the delay.
     
    I think I meant "ask around" in terms of performance, not to ask to find one.
     
    The place I've used so far is eBay... there you can find 2nd hand commercial radios for dirt cheap. In fact, I recently acquired a few Moto XPR6550 for about 100 bucks a pop... I'll be selling all other non Vertex/Motorola radios I own after I am done swapping all the radios with 6550s.
     
    G.
  3. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from ajk170 in What I Wish I Knew When I First Started With GMRS   
    Your "sharing experiences" was what allowed to put it all together. Thanks!
     
    Moral of the story is, even if you think you know, talking to someone who has a lot of experience will help a lot...  
     
     
    G.
     
     
  4. Like
    gman1971 reacted to kidphc in Mobile Antenna   
    Although, not the most optimal location, close to the other options short of drilling. If you can keep the coil of the antenna above and away from metal you should be good. 
     
    Here is some reading on placements of antennas.
    Some more. Yes I know it is for a CB and a Jeep. It is just to help understand the type of directionality you get with the pattern.
     
    http://www.mvaranet.org/uploads/2/7/2/2/27221859/1422988925.png
  5. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from Soladaddy in Antenna grounding   
    I didn't thought much of grounding antennas until I moved to my current house and needed every bit of range I could muster. Grounding the antenna made a significant reception difference, as in, it went from ~5 miles max to ~15 miles easy... grounding the antenna did lower the dB floor according to my spectrum analyzer, thus substantially improving reception range.
     
    To do grounding I read a lot of advice from people who do commercial tower installations and the NEC guidelines, etc.
     
    So, here is what worked for me:
     
    I purchased two Times Microwave Arresters, both N female, both Low PIM (low Passive Inter-Modulation), and both are bolted to the metal mast that holds the antenna(s) and the mast (1.25" steel pipe) is grounded using two copper clamps and a 10AWG wire to the house ground rod electrical box.
     
    The first arrester is placed right before the antenna, at the top of the mast. The second one is at the bottom of the mast. The short run between the antenna and the first arrester is a 4 foot LMR400 patch, coiled twice and both ends are silver plated connectors for low PIM. Then, from the first arrester (at the top) to the 2nd arrester at the bottom of the mast there is a 20 feet Heliax 1/2" cable run, both are N male ends and tri-metal low PIM connectors. The bottom arrester has a 90 degree elbow (silver plated) and another Heliax 1/2" 6 feet run, (both ends of this cable are also tri-metal low PIM) to the input of the "radio box" ... Inside the radio box I am using MILSPEC RG-214 patch cables with N male silver plated connectors for low PIM. The only connections that have any chrome plating are the antenna's SO239 and the Vertex Standard EVX-5300's mini-UHF connector.
     
    As you can see, I ditched all the UHF connectors and my SWR no longer creeps over time due to connectors being exposed to the crap weather. It was a "Copernican turn" for me, as all I had before was 239 stuff... glad I moved away from those, and from chrome plating... which caused a host of problems with the massive 1400 Candelabra tower sitting less than 2 miles from my antenna mast...
     
    All my radios are connected to a solar panel array and a 12VDC battery bank, thus not sharing anything electrical with the house, but the negative (ground) of the battery bank is connected to the same ground 10AWG wire the antenna mast is.
     
    G.
  6. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from Extreme in (1) Range for base + handheld / (2) base antenna placement   
    Sorry Logan5, but your case is not typical. You either live in a very flat place, at the top of a hill, or atop a mount, or even atop a mountain, b/c using 5W UHF where I live (near Madison WI), with my antenna placed atop a 40 feet mast, using Heliax 1/2" feedline doesn't reach reliably more than 5 miles out to HT, and that is spotty at best... even when pushing 50W GMRS out using Vertex Standard EVX-5400 mobile, through the same 40 feet antenna, it barely reaches 10 miles to another EVX-5400 mobile using a vehicle mounted NMO antenna (no magmount crap)... but to HT?... Sorry, but not typical to get 10 miles out of 5W.
     
    Using BTECH crap, TYT crap, or in general anything CCR crap, or anything that isn't commercial grade gear will result in disappointment. I've alredy been through the CCR road, and while they do have their uses, reliable comms at long range isn't one of them, and I am talking about all these cheapies with flashy screens and 10 million channels with fancy colored buttons and slick shapes... etc. In the end, my Vertex Standard EVX-5300 G7, with a single digit 8 segment LCD display and a total of 8 channels draws rings around all of these cheapies in terms of what matters: radio reception performance.
     
    G.
     
     
  7. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from Soladaddy in (1) Range for base + handheld / (2) base antenna placement   
    Well, I wouldn't use ham grade gear as the standard to measure the CCRs up against either, when in reality most ham gear is also pretty subpar when compared to commercial or military grade gear. Receiver performance, in particular intermod rejection and selectivity is where most CCRs and ham gear tends to fall flat.
     
    The receiver sensitivity is a meaningless figure without taking into account selectivity. The TM-V71a has 0.16 uV sensitivity @ 12 SINAD in VHF/ UHF, which beats the 0.18uV of the IC-7000, and the 0.25uV of the Vertex Standard EVX-5400... but suffers heavily from intermod. When the TM-V71a is tuned to VHF frequencies, the NOAA weather station sitting 2 1/2 miles from home breaks through randomly regardless of whatever frequency you have the radio tuned to. On the other hand, the EVX-5400 hooked to the same antenna, in the same frequency never hears the NOAA station. That is an example of poor receiver performance. The TM-V71a can barely hear anything beyond 10 miles due to the receiver being saturated by the nearby RF noise, but the EVX-5400 almost full quiets from 10 miles away when talking to home from the same 5W portable... The CCRs, in particular all the TYT brands, those will simply desense down to zero when connected to my base antenna so reception range goes to zero.
     
    Now, perhaps If you live in a lower RF congested area then, perhaps, a CCR would be fine; but the again, owning a radio that only works in certain conditions is not a good radio to own IMO. If you need urban performance in crowded RF environments, then most of these Cheap Chinese Radios will disappoint.
     
    With that said, cheapies CCRs have their uses. For example, the Baofeng BF-1801 (Clone of the TYT  MD-760) works great as a floor intercom radio... just don't expect that radio to make miracles in terms of range.
     
    Considering a lot of the Kenwood/Icom/Motorola commercial grade radios are sold for quite a bargain on eBay, I really don't see any reason to own a subpar radio...
     
    Buying cheap in radio gear is the surest way to buying twice.
     
    G.
     
     
     
  8. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from gortex2 in (1) Range for base + handheld / (2) base antenna placement   
    Sorry Logan5, but your case is not typical. You either live in a very flat place, at the top of a hill, or atop a mount, or even atop a mountain, b/c using 5W UHF where I live (near Madison WI), with my antenna placed atop a 40 feet mast, using Heliax 1/2" feedline doesn't reach reliably more than 5 miles out to HT, and that is spotty at best... even when pushing 50W GMRS out using Vertex Standard EVX-5400 mobile, through the same 40 feet antenna, it barely reaches 10 miles to another EVX-5400 mobile using a vehicle mounted NMO antenna (no magmount crap)... but to HT?... Sorry, but not typical to get 10 miles out of 5W.
     
    Using BTECH crap, TYT crap, or in general anything CCR crap, or anything that isn't commercial grade gear will result in disappointment. I've alredy been through the CCR road, and while they do have their uses, reliable comms at long range isn't one of them, and I am talking about all these cheapies with flashy screens and 10 million channels with fancy colored buttons and slick shapes... etc. In the end, my Vertex Standard EVX-5300 G7, with a single digit 8 segment LCD display and a total of 8 channels draws rings around all of these cheapies in terms of what matters: radio reception performance.
     
    G.
     
     
  9. Like
    gman1971 reacted to berkinet in (1) Range for base + handheld / (2) base antenna placement   
    If you want to save some money, there are GMRS Certified radios available on the used market that are both a lot less expensive than the Midland products, and a lot better.  Search through this forum and you will find many recommendations.
  10. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from Mikeam in Midland GMRS Product updates   
    Would be awesome if they moved the manufacturing back to the USA... but I won't hold my hopes very high...
  11. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from H8SPVMT in What I Wish I Knew When I First Started With GMRS   
    Your "sharing experiences" was what allowed to put it all together. Thanks!
     
    Moral of the story is, even if you think you know, talking to someone who has a lot of experience will help a lot...  
     
     
    G.
     
     
  12. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from sifert in Midland GMRS Product updates   
    Would be awesome if they moved the manufacturing back to the USA... but I won't hold my hopes very high...
  13. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from sifert in What I Wish I Knew When I First Started With GMRS   
    Your "sharing experiences" was what allowed to put it all together. Thanks!
     
    Moral of the story is, even if you think you know, talking to someone who has a lot of experience will help a lot...  
     
     
    G.
     
     
  14. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from marcspaz in Reflected power readings   
    LOL...  you got me.
     
  15. Like
    gman1971 reacted to marcspaz in What I Wish I Knew When I First Started With GMRS   
    That is a very nice thing to say. I appreciate it.. but you did all the work and figured everything out. I just shared some personal experience.
     
    Btw... I had a great time talking with you through all of that. I am very glad it finally all came together.
  16. Like
    gman1971 reacted to marcspaz in Reflected power readings   
    G.... it was a joke. LoL
     
    I could be wrong, but I think the only SMA antenna mount is on an HT.
  17. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from marcspaz in What I Wish I Knew When I First Started With GMRS   
    I wish I would've known Marc Spaz before I started on GMRS, or anything radio, really... he has helped me tremendously go from barely 4 miles to well beyond 15 miles simplex mobile to base...
     
    G.
  18. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from jsouth in Antenna grounding   
    I didn't thought much of grounding antennas until I moved to my current house and needed every bit of range I could muster. Grounding the antenna made a significant reception difference, as in, it went from ~5 miles max to ~15 miles easy... grounding the antenna did lower the dB floor according to my spectrum analyzer, thus substantially improving reception range.
     
    To do grounding I read a lot of advice from people who do commercial tower installations and the NEC guidelines, etc.
     
    So, here is what worked for me:
     
    I purchased two Times Microwave Arresters, both N female, both Low PIM (low Passive Inter-Modulation), and both are bolted to the metal mast that holds the antenna(s) and the mast (1.25" steel pipe) is grounded using two copper clamps and a 10AWG wire to the house ground rod electrical box.
     
    The first arrester is placed right before the antenna, at the top of the mast. The second one is at the bottom of the mast. The short run between the antenna and the first arrester is a 4 foot LMR400 patch, coiled twice and both ends are silver plated connectors for low PIM. Then, from the first arrester (at the top) to the 2nd arrester at the bottom of the mast there is a 20 feet Heliax 1/2" cable run, both are N male ends and tri-metal low PIM connectors. The bottom arrester has a 90 degree elbow (silver plated) and another Heliax 1/2" 6 feet run, (both ends of this cable are also tri-metal low PIM) to the input of the "radio box" ... Inside the radio box I am using MILSPEC RG-214 patch cables with N male silver plated connectors for low PIM. The only connections that have any chrome plating are the antenna's SO239 and the Vertex Standard EVX-5300's mini-UHF connector.
     
    As you can see, I ditched all the UHF connectors and my SWR no longer creeps over time due to connectors being exposed to the crap weather. It was a "Copernican turn" for me, as all I had before was 239 stuff... glad I moved away from those, and from chrome plating... which caused a host of problems with the massive 1400 Candelabra tower sitting less than 2 miles from my antenna mast...
     
    All my radios are connected to a solar panel array and a 12VDC battery bank, thus not sharing anything electrical with the house, but the negative (ground) of the battery bank is connected to the same ground 10AWG wire the antenna mast is.
     
    G.
  19. Like
    gman1971 reacted to marcspaz in What I Wish I Knew When I First Started With GMRS   
    I think the biggest problem is, there are too many opinions AND most new users don't even know "what" they want to do.  For the most part, many new radio users don't know what tech is the correct tech for any intended purpose.  Until they get in and find out something they like and figure out how it will suit their needs, we wouldn't even know what advice to give.
     
    I have tried to help, though.  I actually have a published article I wrote about the pros and cons of each common service, what they could potentially used for, and just a really brief overview of the science behind it.  It was focused around off-road communications, but applies to everything.  I can always share it here, but I haven't due to potential bickering. 
  20. Like
    gman1971 reacted to WRCZ387 in Anytone AT-578UV thoughts   
    You're welcome
     
    73
    Greg
    WRCZ387
    Clearwater, FL
  21. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from mcallahan in Well, this is exciting.   
    You could build a far better repeater from commercial gear... cheaper, and be type accepted too...  
  22. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from Radioguy7268 in Well, this is exciting.   
    You could build a far better repeater from commercial gear... cheaper, and be type accepted too...  
  23. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from mcallahan in Dazed, Confused, Disappointed (Question includes Range, Power, Repeaters, BaoFeng)   
    1/2 mile is about right with those Baofengs on UHF. Reaching further distance will require to use a better antenna placed at a height higher than 20 feet AGL. That would be the cheapest option IMO, if you want to increase range. Going with higher end walkies will probably increase the range too, and depending on conditions it might almost double the range, but that could end up being very costly... and in the end a better antenna placed higher is always the better route.
     
    Going mobile (instead of walkie) will give you 10dB more power (x10 power) but range might not increase much, as the higher placed antenna will be a far better solution.
     
    I don't think repeaters can be made dual duty due to the hardware involved in making one, you need two different repeaters to do Ham and GMRS.
     
     
    G.
     
     
     
  24. Like
    gman1971 got a reaction from WRFF874 in Dazed, Confused, Disappointed (Question includes Range, Power, Repeaters, BaoFeng)   
    1/2 mile is about right with those Baofengs on UHF. Reaching further distance will require to use a better antenna placed at a height higher than 20 feet AGL. That would be the cheapest option IMO, if you want to increase range. Going with higher end walkies will probably increase the range too, and depending on conditions it might almost double the range, but that could end up being very costly... and in the end a better antenna placed higher is always the better route.
     
    Going mobile (instead of walkie) will give you 10dB more power (x10 power) but range might not increase much, as the higher placed antenna will be a far better solution.
     
    I don't think repeaters can be made dual duty due to the hardware involved in making one, you need two different repeaters to do Ham and GMRS.
     
     
    G.
     
     
     
  25. Like
    gman1971 reacted to JLeikhim in The RF SIDE - par deux The Repeater saga.   
    I would be wary of that LNA. Assuming your duplexing and preselector is working properly to reject TX noise and carrier (TNRD) to the degree that the additional low noise is useable, i would install an attenuator after that LNA to remove excess gain before the receiver. You do have that preselector between the duplexer and LNA I assume?
     
    Have you performed a duplex sensitivity (effective sensitivit) test into dummy load and antenna?
     
    If you don't run this basic test, the repeater can be functionally deaf.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.