Jump to content

BuyTwoWayRadios.com

Photo

Using UV-82C for Part 95E


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#21 kb2ztx

kb2ztx

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • LocationEast Coast
  • GMRS Callsign:WQLY948
  • Ham Callsign:KB2ZTX

Posted 26 November 2019 - 06:54 AM

Not to drag this topic further into further CCR bashing there is one important item to consider. The desire to get into radio is something many dont do any more nor have any interest. So the good thing is some people still want to. The issue with the Baofeng or any CCR is the performance as many he mentioned. The performance can impact the users "taste" of the hobby and many times they loose interest cause it doesn't do what it should. I have had this happen in the SAR world and also Amateur world on top of my GMRS repeaters. 90% of the folks that buy those complain they can't hit the repeater or are so broken up and unreadable more folks tell them its junk. This causes them to loose interest and leave the radio world. 

 

For me I started grabbing cheap good radios when i have extra cash and leave them sitting. When i get a person who wants to use a baofeng I hand them one of these and let them use it side by side. Normally 2 days later I get "hey can i buy this from you". There is alot of good radios out there dirt cheap that works well for GMRS. I recently picked up 6 HT1000 portables for $50.00. Threw some $20.00 batteries on them and programmed up for GMRS. I have one left in the box. 

 

If your truly interested in radio get a reputable radio or your expectations will not be met.

 

JMHO


  • WRAF213, Downs and gman1971 like this

#22 WREB270

WREB270

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • GMRS Callsign:WREB270

Posted 26 November 2019 - 07:54 AM

Not to drag this topic further into further CCR bashing there is one important item to consider. The desire to get into radio is something many dont do any more nor have any interest. So the good thing is some people still want to. The issue with the Baofeng or any CCR is the performance as many he mentioned. The performance can impact the users "taste" of the hobby and many times they loose interest cause it doesn't do what it should. I have had this happen in the SAR world and also Amateur world on top of my GMRS repeaters. 90% of the folks that buy those complain they can't hit the repeater or are so broken up and unreadable more folks tell them its junk. This causes them to loose interest and leave the radio world.

For me I started grabbing cheap good radios when i have extra cash and leave them sitting. When i get a person who wants to use a baofeng I hand them one of these and let them use it side by side. Normally 2 days later I get "hey can i buy this from you". There is alot of good radios out there dirt cheap that works well for GMRS. I recently picked up 6 HT1000 portables for $50.00. Threw some $20.00 batteries on them and programmed up for GMRS. I have one left in the box.

If your truly interested in radio get a reputable radio or your expectations will not be met.

JMHO


De ja vu... This is an excellent point. I first got bit by the radio bug when I was a kid in the 90's. No cell phones radio was the cool thing. 2007 I started getting FCC licenses starting with my GROL. Fell out of the hobby and started up again 10 years later. When I started up I had a friend start up with some cheap Chinese mobiles from Amazon. I bought a couple Baofeng handhelds that I didn't have much issue with. He ended up dropping out due to not getting what he wanted out of the underperforming radio just like you said. We have an excellent HAM community here but I'm not much into talking to complete strangers, I wanted to communicate with friends and family. So I dropped out of radio again until this year when I decided to give GMRS a shot because one station license could be shared by my household.
  • kb2ztx and Ian like this
PG00022798
WREB270

#23 Downs

Downs

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 88 posts
  • LocationHunt County Texas
  • GMRS Callsign:WQYH678
  • Ham Callsign:KK6RBI

Posted 26 November 2019 - 09:49 AM

Lol on the amateur sude I have been through 5 UV-50x2 this year, thank God for Amazon's return policy, just trying to get one unit that worked. The worst one lasted less than 45 seconds. None of them output the stated power, the first thing I do is slap a meter on them to check. One did the stated power rating but frequency shifted in the first day, most hung out around 20watts on a 50 watt rated radio that's way outside a margin of error, and one actually output 9 watts then went to 0 (the one that died in about a minute of use). Also went through a couple of the UV-82HPs that are supposed to be 8watts. Those are actually relabeled UV-6R radios and have a max output of 6 watts.

BTech just doesn't expect most people dumping cash on these radios to check their equipment. They don't need to, get 700 people to leave a 5 star review on Amazon like... "Works Good" or some bogus claim on range and your set 500 more people will see that and drop the cash.

I actually bought one of their amps too, the first two were junk, 3rd was spot on.

Why so much, I wanted to give Baofeng a good college try, I figured maybe I had a dud and wanted to put that theory to the test, nope just false advertising and shoddy equipment. It didn't cost me a dime, just time and when I decide to go GMRS for the family instead of stacking HAM licenses I went right to the Midland radio and when I outfit the next vehicle it will be a Midland, icom, kenwood, or Motorola.

The saying you can't afford to go cheap is true, imagine dumping $200 on a Baofeng mobile radio for it to fail just outside the warranty window or even outside the 30 day return window. Btech is notorious for having poor customer service when it comes to repair/replacement of their equipment. I have read stories where people pay shipping shipping costs only to get another raido that junks out and having to pay shipping costs again.

You can get a 40watt Midland GMRS mobile for $230 and it will work and it will put out around 40 watts, the Baofeng GMRS is $200 and is almost guarantee never to put out anywhere near 50watts and probably will fail you sooner than later.

I'm not bashing Baofeng because I'm on a soap box running thousands in radio equipment, but because I am an owner and have mostly poor experience using them.

You must have the worst electronic luck imaginable. Ive got a pile of UV5Rs, BF888s, a few UV82HPs, a BFF8HP, Wouxoun KGUV8D and a UV50X2.

Ive had all of them on a meter. All put out advertised power levels. The UV50X2 actually does 70 watts on VHF in some parts of the band. This radio is a year and a half old now.

Ive got a 8ish year old UV5R that's my motorcycle mobile radio thats been mounted on my bars since new and its survived all that time exposed to vibrations, UV, rain, cold, heat. Being ejected a few times off pavement at 40mph, ect

Now i cant speak for how clean their signal is as i dont have the equipment to check that but for my uses theyve been quite satisfactory.

Issues ive had with them

The UV50X2 has a wonky channel knob.

1 of my 888s wont talk to chirp anymore

KGUV8D consumes batteries even when its switched off.


All this being said I switched a surplus Motorola PM400 (UHF) into my Jeep and am enjoying it quite a bit. Nice and simple. I know its rugged. Its pretty compact and the audio quality out and in is awesome. I lost being able to do a VFO mode and dual band of the UV50X2 but I rarely use VHF anymore so no huge deal.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

A pile of "cheap Chinese radios", BF888s, UV5Rs, UV82s, KGUV8Ds, BFF8HP, UV50X2, and a few "good" radios, Yeasu FT310 (airband/nav), Yeasu FT90R (no longer in mobile service used as a base radio)


#24 gman1971

gman1971

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 26 November 2019 - 12:13 PM

This, a-men.

 

 

 

If your truly interested in radio get a reputable radio or your expectations will not be met.

 

JMHO


  • kb2ztx likes this

#25 gman1971

gman1971

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 26 November 2019 - 12:23 PM

Which proves the point, that those things are a hit or miss, b/c the QC is just not there. Again, I started with those and I have a dozen or so of these BF-888S at home set as intercom.

 

The point I am trying to make here is to be VERY AWARE of what you're getting, understand its limitations and make an educated purchase. 

 

G.

 

 

You must have the worst electronic luck imaginable. Ive got a pile of UV5Rs, BF888s, a few UV82HPs, a BFF8HP, Wouxoun KGUV8D and a UV50X2.

Ive had all of them on a meter. All put out advertised power levels. The UV50X2 actually does 70 watts on VHF in some parts of the band. This radio is a year and a half old now.

Ive got a 8ish year old UV5R that's my motorcycle mobile radio thats been mounted on my bars since new and its survived all that time exposed to vibrations, UV, rain, cold, heat. Being ejected a few times off pavement at 40mph, ect

Now i cant speak for how clean their signal is as i dont have the equipment to check that but for my uses theyve been quite satisfactory.

Issues ive had with them

The UV50X2 has a wonky channel knob.

1 of my 888s wont talk to chirp anymore

KGUV8D consumes batteries even when its switched off.


All this being said I switched a surplus Motorola PM400 (UHF) into my Jeep and am enjoying it quite a bit. Nice and simple. I know its rugged. Its pretty compact and the audio quality out and in is awesome. I lost being able to do a VFO mode and dual band of the UV50X2 but I rarely use VHF anymore so no huge deal.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk


  • Downs likes this

#26 WREB270

WREB270

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • GMRS Callsign:WREB270

Posted 26 November 2019 - 01:42 PM

You must have the worst electronic luck imaginable. Ive got a pile of UV5Rs, BF888s, a few UV82HPs, a BFF8HP, Wouxoun KGUV8D and a UV50X2.

Ive had all of them on a meter. All put out advertised power levels. The UV50X2 actually does 70 watts on VHF in some parts of the band. This radio is a year and a half old now.

Ive got a 8ish year old UV5R that's my motorcycle mobile radio thats been mounted on my bars since new and its survived all that time exposed to vibrations, UV, rain, cold, heat. Being ejected a few times off pavement at 40mph, ect

Now i cant speak for how clean their signal is as i dont have the equipment to check that but for my uses theyve been quite satisfactory.

Issues ive had with them

The UV50X2 has a wonky channel knob.

1 of my 888s wont talk to chirp anymore

KGUV8D consumes batteries even when its switched off.


All this being said I switched a surplus Motorola PM400 (UHF) into my Jeep and am enjoying it quite a bit. Nice and simple. I know its rugged. Its pretty compact and the audio quality out and in is awesome. I lost being able to do a VFO mode and dual band of the UV50X2 but I rarely use VHF anymore so no huge deal.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Could be a bad lot number, batch of 60 or so get made with a sub part or other issue and is not caught, Amazon gets that entire lot and Bam that's what happens. There are plenty of reviews on these radios not out puting their ratings. ALSO I have seen one like yours where it is cranking out 70-80 watts. But that's doesn't say much for consistency.

I have UV-5Rs that run excellently. I still have both the 82HPs, they are in fact rebranded uv6r's it's right in the box from btech and only put out 6watts on high. And again look through reviews you will see this is not uncommon. One actually quit work without using an external mic.
  • Downs likes this
PG00022798
WREB270

#27 Ian

Ian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • GMRS Callsign:WRCH569

Posted 05 December 2019 - 10:48 PM

https://forums.mygmr...ype-95/?p=13112
 
I believe that using the UV-82C for GMRS would be legal, per the two-year-old FCC guidance linked here.  Then again, the left hand seems unsure of what the right hand is doing, and there's a distressing lack of new-production GMRS radios capable of operating to the limits of permitted emissions.  This'll be a good time to get the popcorn out... But I'm no longer afraid to transmit with my Radioddity GD-77s (which I've long used for scanning repeaters).
 
https://transition.f...iling-r1-TH.pdf



#28 Ian

Ian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • GMRS Callsign:WRCH569

Posted 05 December 2019 - 11:30 PM

One visit from a FCC field officer and your $24 dollar radio may end up costing you $2400... 

Can't get blood from a stone.  America frequently tries, which is how you spend twenty years in jail moving from trial to trial.


  • Downs likes this

#29 zackandmack

zackandmack

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • LocationState of Jefferson
  • GMRS Callsign:WRDZ552
  • Ham Callsign:N6TDG

Posted 10 December 2019 - 03:47 AM

Not wanting to get into the CCR battle here, but it is my understanding that Midland mobiles are re-badged Luitons.  If I am wrong, please correct me.  Our local area started a GMRS Neighborhood Radio Fire Watch.  It has come in handy during the PG and E power shutoffs.  I purchased a Btech GMRS V1 hand held with the matching Nagoya 701c antenna.    It was a hurried purchase as my wife needed something for when I was to be gone for two weeks working in another city.  I did not have time to aquaint her with a mobile system and how to set up for use with alternate power supply, much less getting a base antenna, etc, etc...

 

Maybe I have a good one, but I can reach the new repeater easily from my qth.  I will invest in a different system, but at the time the Btech met our needs.  My goal was to have her be able to reach at least one other person...and that it does and more so.  The Btech was heard easily during nets whereas some others running the Midland products could not be heard.  Part of that is of course due to antenna, location and all those variables.  We live in hilly, treed terrain, so that factors in too.  

 

All I can say is that for the money, the Btech has worked for us.  I have another half a dozen various dual and triband hand helds made by the big three, as well as two different mobile/base radios, etc...so, while far from being any expert, I do know enough to get myself in trouble.  

 

Anyway, that has been my experience.  I even purchased one of those darn Btech hand helds for my neighbor across the road, He, licensed Extra, has part 90 equipment that needs ancient DOS programs to do anything...with the Btech, I was able to put in all the desired fire frequencies and air tac frequencies that he wanted and gave him the radio.  It is what it is and will probably fail.  But we aren't rag chewing for hours on end so it might last for a while.

 

As for the original question, the UV-82C is not Part 95 compliant and technically not allowed to be used for GMRS.  I will leave it at that.  If there is a wildfire and PG and E has the power shut off...no one will be questioning which radio I will be using to find out which road is open or closed due to fire.

 

Will it be  Luiton or Midland?  Btech GMRS, or UV 82x3, or Anytone, or an Icom 4001?  

 

73


  • RCM likes this

#30 gman1971

gman1971

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 10 December 2019 - 04:52 AM

I don't know about the Luiton, etc...

 

But like I stated in some other post I made, gauging your radio performance based on its ability to hit repeaters is doomed to succeed (its a useless test to gauge performance). Those BTech stuff RF performance in simplex, when there is no repeater around that is using $2000 radio gear to do the heavy lifting, in simplex, they'll simply fall flat in their face. Especially so in a congested RF area, these are just worthless pieces of junk for anything mission critical. For the money you're better off picking up a used commercial UHF portable, that will have a proper dual conversion superhet receiver with a front end that isn't wide as a barn door, nor will desense with the 89.7 latest 80s tunes radio station. 

 

I am glad it works, but won't be surprised if it doesn't when you need it the most. It has happened to me... and since that day, no CCRs for me.

 

I'd take an Icom, or a Kenwood (like my TH-F6a) any day of the week over anything CCR, especially if it is for anything that is mission critical. Myself, for GMRS I own several used/new Vertex Standard EVX radios. I do use the cheapies for intercom at home, where the range I need is just 20 yards, which those afford fine, but when I walk out the door for anything that requires a radio that won't desense into oblivion? Vertex Standard all the way.

 

The noise at my location, measured with a VNA, is in the -50 dB threshold range in the GMRS range, I live 2 miles from a 1400 foot antenna tower, that makes nearly all the CCRs useless beyond 1/4 of a mile in simplex.

 

G.

 

Not wanting to get into the CCR battle here, but it is my understanding that Midland mobiles are re-badged Luitons.  If I am wrong, please correct me.  Our local area started a GMRS Neighborhood Radio Fire Watch.  It has come in handy during the PG and E power shutoffs.  I purchased a Btech GMRS V1 hand held with the matching Nagoya 701c antenna.    It was a hurried purchase as my wife needed something for when I was to be gone for two weeks working in another city.  I did not have time to aquaint her with a mobile system and how to set up for use with alternate power supply, much less getting a base antenna, etc, etc...

 

Maybe I have a good one, but I can reach the new repeater easily from my qth.  I will invest in a different system, but at the time the Btech met our needs.  My goal was to have her be able to reach at least one other person...and that it does and more so.  The Btech was heard easily during nets whereas some others running the Midland products could not be heard.  Part of that is of course due to antenna, location and all those variables.  We live in hilly, treed terrain, so that factors in too.  

 

All I can say is that for the money, the Btech has worked for us.  I have another half a dozen various dual and triband hand helds made by the big three, as well as two different mobile/base radios, etc...so, while far from being any expert, I do know enough to get myself in trouble.  

 

Anyway, that has been my experience.  I even purchased one of those darn Btech hand helds for my neighbor across the road, He, licensed Extra, has part 90 equipment that needs ancient DOS programs to do anything...with the Btech, I was able to put in all the desired fire frequencies and air tac frequencies that he wanted and gave him the radio.  It is what it is and will probably fail.  But we aren't rag chewing for hours on end so it might last for a while.

 

As for the original question, the UV-82C is not Part 95 compliant and technically not allowed to be used for GMRS.  I will leave it at that.  If there is a wildfire and PG and E has the power shut off...no one will be questioning which radio I will be using to find out which road is open or closed due to fire.

 

Will it be  Luiton or Midland?  Btech GMRS, or UV 82x3, or Anytone, or an Icom 4001?  

 

73



#31 marcspaz

marcspaz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 663 posts
  • LocationLocation Location

Posted 10 December 2019 - 08:44 AM

I can't really speak to the Midland being a rebadged brand. I have heard some mention it, but I haven't really seen anything that supports it.

I think it's like TV tech about 20 years ago. Mitsubishi was making IC's that were used in almost every TV built, so rumor spread that all TV's were just rebranded Mitsubishi TV's.... which was not true.

I have several MXT400's. If you want new, no nonsense, out of the box with a warranty, they are great. But like anything else entry level, there are some drawbacks. No split tone and lack of wide-band are the 2 most notable.

I have a few Baofeng ham radios. They are okay, but I wouldn't rely on them in a Dark Sky event. I use iCom and Yaesu for "when it counts".

I've mentioned this before... GMRS is not a proper solution for COOP/DR ops, even if it's for your family. You really should get ham licenses and use HF. I can talk simplex wide-band FM, reliably, for several hundred miles, and around the globe on SSB.

I really love GMRS and it's the platform I use the most... but it's a line of sight service/technology.

#32 zackandmack

zackandmack

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • LocationState of Jefferson
  • GMRS Callsign:WRDZ552
  • Ham Callsign:N6TDG

Posted 10 December 2019 - 10:20 PM

I don't know about the Luiton, etc...

 

But like I stated in some other post I made, gauging your radio performance based on its ability to hit repeaters is doomed to succeed (its a useless test to gauge performance). Those BTech stuff RF performance in simplex, when there is no repeater around that is using $2000 radio gear to do the heavy lifting, in simplex, they'll simply fall flat in their face. Especially so in a congested RF area, these are just worthless pieces of junk for anything mission critical. For the money you're better off picking up a used commercial UHF portable, that will have a proper dual conversion superhet receiver with a front end that isn't wide as a barn door, nor will desense with the 89.7 latest 80s tunes radio station. 

 

I am glad it works, but won't be surprised if it doesn't when you need it the most. It has happened to me... and since that day, no CCRs for me.

 

I'd take an Icom, or a Kenwood (like my TH-F6a) any day of the week over anything CCR, especially if it is for anything that is mission critical. Myself, for GMRS I own several used/new Vertex Standard EVX radios. I do use the cheapies for intercom at home, where the range I need is just 20 yards, which those afford fine, but when I walk out the door for anything that requires a radio that won't desense into oblivion? Vertex Standard all the way.

 

The noise at my location, measured with a VNA, is in the -50 dB threshold range in the GMRS range, I live 2 miles from a 1400 foot antenna tower, that makes nearly all the CCRs useless beyond 1/4 of a mile in simplex.

 

G.

 

 

And I will be picking something up for next year.  It probably won't be the Midland.  I do have the Kenwood F6a,  TMv71a, Alinco 235, Yaesu FT 60, VX 5, VX 2, Anytone 3318E and a couple of Baofengs.  Oh...forgot the old Icom 751 for HF.  RF Noise is quite limited out here in the foothills of the Sierra.  

 

Look, I know the limitations of CCRs.  And I know it will fail.  But for now it serves my purpose.  We use GMRS for a specific purpose, which is Neighborhood Radio Fire Watch.  For rag chewing, etc...I have other radios and allstar nodes.  If fact, was talking to a guy from Western Australia today as I was walking up our ¼ mile driveway.  Kinda nice.  GMRS, CCR or not..will not do that.

 

73



#33 zackandmack

zackandmack

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • LocationState of Jefferson
  • GMRS Callsign:WRDZ552
  • Ham Callsign:N6TDG

Posted 10 December 2019 - 10:43 PM

The performance of the Btech has been quite adequate for my uses.  To the repeater its about five miles through hills and trees.  It is located on the flatland and designed to beam back up here into the hills.  Simplex, I can cover everyone from my location within five miles using the Nagoya 701c antenna.  Again, hills and trees.  Its the Gold Country here in far Northern California  just to give you an ideda of the terrain.  And I am not using the radio for rag chewing.  Others may use GMRS for different purposes and that is fine.

 

Would I recommend the Btech radio to a beginner in GMRS?  Sure.  Maybe its heresy around here, but it is  a radio.  I don't think I would recommend any of their mobiles.  Would I also recommend moving beyond the Btech into part 90/95 equipment like Kenwood, or Icom, etc?  You betcha.  But just like in amateur radio, the CCRs provide an entry.  (nothwithstanding all the non licensed uses, etc).  Used properly, one have find great enjoyment from their Potato radio.  They can talk to ISS, Satellites, as well do APRS and a whole host of other things.  In fact Digital radio is being lead not from D-Star, or Fusion, but DMR and CCRs.  (Think Anytone).

 

I went into my purchase of the Btech knowing full well what they are.  But heck, the Yaesu FT-60 new I had to send back as it would not TX...so tell me again?


  • Elkhunter521, RCM and gman1971 like this

#34 marcspaz

marcspaz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 663 posts
  • LocationLocation Location

Posted 11 December 2019 - 01:13 AM

...But heck, the Yaesu FT-60 new I had to send back as it would not TX...so tell me again?

I love the way Yaesu radios look and feel.  They have great features and are very intuitive to use.  BUT... my FT-8900 had blown receive filters, brand new out of the box.  And today, my 5 day old $800 Yaesu FT-857D caught on fire while I was in the middle of a QSO.

 

With all of the terrible stuff that I experienced with BTech/BaoFeng ham radios, none of them caught on fire and nearly burn my Jeep down with me in it.

 

I think I am going to switch to Kenwood.  LOL



#35 gman1971

gman1971

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 11 December 2019 - 02:30 AM

I am not saying don't buy CCR, just know what you're getting. That's all, so you don't put too much faith on those inexpensive radios.

 

GMRS won't do it b/c it is only FCC, but in theory, if another country who follows the FCC ruling has a GMRS repeater linked you could talk all over the world too... I know, not RF direct call, but still cool nonetheless.

 

 

And I will be picking something up for next year.  It probably won't be the Midland.  I do have the Kenwood F6a,  TMv71a, Alinco 235, Yaesu FT 60, VX 5, VX 2, Anytone 3318E and a couple of Baofengs.  Oh...forgot the old Icom 751 for HF.  RF Noise is quite limited out here in the foothills of the Sierra.  

 

Look, I know the limitations of CCRs.  And I know it will fail.  But for now it serves my purpose.  We use GMRS for a specific purpose, which is Neighborhood Radio Fire Watch.  For rag chewing, etc...I have other radios and allstar nodes.  If fact, was talking to a guy from Western Australia today as I was walking up our ¼ mile driveway.  Kinda nice.  GMRS, CCR or not..will not do that.

 

73



#36 zackandmack

zackandmack

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • LocationState of Jefferson
  • GMRS Callsign:WRDZ552
  • Ham Callsign:N6TDG

Posted 11 December 2019 - 02:36 AM

I am not saying don't buy CCR, just know what you're getting. That's all, so you don't put too much faith on those inexpensive radios.

 

GMRS won't do it b/c it is only FCC, but in theory, if another country who follows the FCC ruling has a GMRS repeater linked you could talk all over the world too... I know, not RF direct call, but still cool nonetheless.

 

 

I have heard of GMRS using allstar linked repeaters and or nodes.  Don't know the legality of this with the FCC, but it might be a gray area someone is taking advantage of.   IIRC it was one gentleman pushing allstar usage with GMRS.  



#37 gman1971

gman1971

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 11 December 2019 - 02:47 AM

AT the risking of possibly starting a fire, I would say that I don't consider Ham Gear mission critical either. Most of the ham stuff I've tried is flimsy, and has RF front ends that are wide as barn doors too. For example, when using my TM-V71a with a triple 5/8 over 5/8, its hammered by intermod pretty hard, mostly due to a NOAA station (and other high powered junk) blasting 2 miles from home from a 1400 foot tower..., and while the CCRs don't hear squat, the TM-V71 hears much better, but still severely desensed and the intermod hurts it really bad. I can hear the NOAA breaking on the GMRS frequencies if I don't run any filtering... In contrast, I don't have that issue with the EVX-5300 radios, even without any filtering added; sure, the EVX-5300 is only an 8 channel mobile with just a single digit numeric LED, and it won't even go below 450 Mhz, but its perfect for GMRS and also allows the option to use DMR.

 

Yes, exactly, a couple of CCR GD77s gave me a taste of DMR, and since then I upgraded all my GMRS FM only gear to high end DMR capable gear, but I still run it on FM. But let me tell you, once you move into high end DMR radios like the EVX-5300, you realize how bad these CCRs really are, even the Anytones (Alinco DJ-MD5) still don't hold a candle to the EVX radios from Vertex Standard (Motorola now)

 

We shall see how it all shakes down. Whatever the future awaits, I am ready to embrace digital the moment the regulations allow for digital voice modes on GMRS.

 

G.

 

The performance of the Btech has been quite adequate for my uses.  To the repeater its about five miles through hills and trees.  It is located on the flatland and designed to beam back up here into the hills.  Simplex, I can cover everyone from my location within five miles using the Nagoya 701c antenna.  Again, hills and trees.  Its the Gold Country here in far Northern California  just to give you an ideda of the terrain.  And I am not using the radio for rag chewing.  Others may use GMRS for different purposes and that is fine.

 

Would I recommend the Btech radio to a beginner in GMRS?  Sure.  Maybe its heresy around here, but it is  a radio.  I don't think I would recommend any of their mobiles.  Would I also recommend moving beyond the Btech into part 90/95 equipment like Kenwood, or Icom, etc?  You betcha.  But just like in amateur radio, the CCRs provide an entry.  (nothwithstanding all the non licensed uses, etc).  Used properly, one have find great enjoyment from their Potato radio.  They can talk to ISS, Satellites, as well do APRS and a whole host of other things.  In fact Digital radio is being lead not from D-Star, or Fusion, but DMR and CCRs.  (Think Anytone).

 

I went into my purchase of the Btech knowing full well what they are.  But heck, the Yaesu FT-60 new I had to send back as it would not TX...so tell me again?



#38 n4gix

n4gix

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • GMRS Callsign:WQWU626
  • Ham Callsign:N4GIX

Posted 12 December 2019 - 01:15 PM

And today, my 5 day old $800 Yaesu FT-857D caught on fire while I was in the middle of a QSO.


Do you have any idea why the FT-857D caught fire? I have one installed in my Toyota Camry and that report of a fire now has me as nervous as a cat trapped on a front porch surrounded by rocking grannies! :huh:


  • berkinet, RCM and gman1971 like this

#39 marcspaz

marcspaz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 663 posts
  • LocationLocation Location

Posted 12 December 2019 - 03:40 PM

Do you have any idea why the FT-857D caught fire? I have one installed in my Toyota Camry and that report of a fire now has me as nervous as a cat trapped on a front porch surrounded by rocking grannies! :huh:

It was sent to Yaesu for review. My initial thought is the controller failed.

Just moments before, the transceiver would keep sending an FM carrier after I let the PTT go. I had to disconnect the power to shut it off. It seemed okay for about 5 minutes after the reboot,before the fire.

Another reason I think it was the controller IC failure is because a huge voltage spike from the IF circuit nuked both antennas and feed lines on the VHF/UHF side and the HF side.

#40 Elkhunter521

Elkhunter521

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 211 posts
  • LocationWashougal Washington
  • GMRS Callsign:Ask

Posted 23 December 2019 - 01:44 AM

The Luiton LT-590 UHF and the Midland 400, except for badging and firmware, are the same radio. I have both. Opened up they are identical. The Luiton comes with programming software and programming cable, 200 channels.
  • berkinet, RCM and Downs like this

Be vewy vewy quiet.
I'm listening to my wadio!





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users