Jump to content

Same radio, different company.


Recommended Posts

While browsing Midland's web site, I saw their HAM radio offering, it is the same as a lot of other CCR's with a Midland sticker.  I'm off of Midland for GMRS now because I don't want to have to deal with trying to use a narrow band radio on my local repeaters networks which are all using wide band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was a pro drag racer, my registered business was Street Jam Racing, but DBA Five Guys Racing.  100% of all business was done as Five Guys Racing.  I always assumed BOND Telecom was DBA Luiton... one and the same.  Never looking into actual registration info, though.  Didn't really seem important.  LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luiton is not an owner of any Chinese manufacturer - they are a distributor (like radioddity and retevis)

 

"Bond is a wholesale provider of many quality Bluetooth products such as adapters, speakers, headsets, gadgets, watches and more.

Located in China, if you purchase from us, we offer many additional convenient services, all of which cannot be easily provided by other Walkie talkie product suppliers." - from the main page of their site

 

Luiton (bond telecom on Amazon) is simply a relabeler - much like Retevis relabels - and radioddity relabel; Chinese manufacturer's sell to wholesalers. They do not operate a direct storefront, but will sell to anyone in multiple units. Wholesalers will sell one radio at a time - and sell on Amazon/fleabay/etc

 

Actual manufacturers are Baofeng/Anytone/TYT/VGC/etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty standard for multiple companies in the same industry to be owned by actually only and handful of parent companies.

 

Food in grocery stores, electronics, software etc... In the US car industry there are only really two manufacturers of battery cores, same with gas only a handful of refineries and the distribution network is becoming a monopoly at this point. The gas you buy at Shell, BP, Costco really only differ in additive packages, added at truck loading and where in the storage unit the fuel came from. The cheaper the gas the more likely the containments. Since, it is most likely coming from the bottom of that gigantic storage unit when it is almost empty.

 

I wonder if the price mark up is the distribution markup combined with FCC certification and Midland's own markup. Esentially, I wonder how much of that $130 or so price difference is markup vs added cost from FCC cert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pricing seems to be all over the place. Here is one source for half the price of others:
 

LUITON LT-898UV Dual Band Base 136-174mhz (VHF) 400-520mhz (UHF) 10Watts Two-Way Radio Mobile Transceiver Amateur Ham Radio with Free Programming Cable Black Product Details Item Weight: 11 Dual Reception/Dual Display; FM radio(87 200 memory channels;

$88.90 $73.95


https://foxandgrapesco.com/p/luiton-lt-898uv-dual-band-base-136-174mhz-vhf-400-520mhz-uhf-10watts-two/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI8aiV7qXG4gIVCdbACh2fsg3WEAYYAiABEgITZ_D_BwE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of comments related to this discussion.

 

#1) I'd be surprised if the cost per unit of certifying a radio for the FCC adds more than a dollar to the unit cost. Based on this site (and others), the cost of getting a radio certified looks like it is usually under $5000

 

#2) As to the difference between two, otherwise identical, radios. One being Part95E certified, the other Part 15 or Part90. My guess is the only difference is operational limitations to conform to the Part95E rules. I really doubt there is any difference in the actual transmitter or receiver circuitry.

 

So, If my second comment is accurate, and the two radios discussed in this topic are truly identical (other than changes to comply with Part95E). there is no way anyone listening could possibly know if you were on a Luiton LT-590 or a Midland XMT400.

 

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Midland and the Luiton truly have the exact same board, that means firmware is the only thing stopping the MXT400 from being wide-band capable.  Makes me wonder if I should try flashing one of my 400's with a LT-590 image?

 

Report back if you do. I'd love to know how it goes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Makes me wonder if I should try flashing one of my 400's with a LT-590 image?

 

At the risk of stating the obvious...  I am not sure what the point would be for most people, well, other than the fun of trying it. Should you actually be able to reflash the MXT400 with different firmware, it would no longer be Part95E certified. In which case, you might as well just buy the Luiton to begin with.  

 

Of course, if you don't care about running a Part95E certified radio, and you have some MXT400s that you'd rather have running wide-band... well, that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The TYT TH-9000 Seems to be the same as the Pofeng BF-9500. However it is FCC certified it appears.  (UPDATE! However it only seems to be part 90)

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/reports/Tcb731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COPY&RequestTimeout=500&tcb_code=&application_id=E0F0to8UH2ZzxNfW%2BsdSIA%3D%3D&fcc_id=X24-MOBILE-U

I have 2 MXT-400 units but being able to program scan patterns, makes the Pofeng/Bofeng/TYT/ versatile and so much more useful.  One can use the computer spreadsheet format to include all of the menu functions on the face plate buttons.  They have 200 "channels" which frequency nicknames for the display (they don't have to be 16 or RP 16 only), coding specific repeater Tone and DCS coses  (useful in mobiles), and even change the function of the PF keys.  None of these "paramaters" allow one to program outside of the box. 

 

The 400s will be standbys for now. Always on the same channel.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.