WRUE951 Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 On 7/13/2024 at 8:31 PM, SteveShannon said: This!!! Forums are always full of people who just can’t believe that rules and laws mean nothing more or less than what is actually written in the rule or law, not what is written elsewhere. They always attempt to explain the intent, but the fact is that intent is worthless. The only thing that ever matters in a courtroom is the letter of the law. But the reality is that the road to the courthouse can be very expensive and most of us know that we can’t afford to fight as long as it might take to get to the letter of the law. That’s where risk aversion comes from. Meanwhile, quite a few here are blowing nothing but angry hot air because 'big man' is putting the hammer down.. And some of us are laughing our a$$ off on the sidelines.. Davichko5650 and Raybestos 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveShannon Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 9 minutes ago, WRUE951 said: you seem to have participated in a lot of $hit, Since you have all this 'experience' put your BIG BOY shoes on and grow some 'B''s and take your childish anger out on the FCC.. No excuses bared. Do your duty and prove your point to the FCC.. And I'll just sit here and watch.. LMAO You seem to be projecting. That’s a bad way to start a week. I hope whatever it is gets better for you. Blaise, AdmiralCochrane, WRUU653 and 4 others 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 1 hour ago, WRUE951 said: you seem to have participated in a lot of $hit, Since you have all this 'experience' put your BIG BOY shoes on and grow some 'B''s and take your childish anger out on the FCC.. No excuses bared. Do your duty and prove your point to the FCC.. And I'll just sit here and watch.. LMAO I'm with Steve on this one. You seem to be the angry one. Like, I think you might need therapy after reading that pathetic string of posts. You can't win the debate with facts to back your opinion, so you start name-calling, being vulgar and antagonistic. A true sign that you are losing and angry about it. Lets be very, very clear about something... I have zero F's to give. I have no grievance with the FCC. I like the way things are working right now. I don't have a dog in the fight, I'm not buying one, and I have nothing to prove. Frankly, I don't care about your opinion either. The only reason I post what I do is so someone new to the forum or with less information, doesn't come in here, read the crap you post, and mistakenly believe it is correct because there was no voice to oppose it. The truth is linked repeaters are legal (via several means), they are not going anywhere and not one single person whining about has been able to provide a single shred of proof to the contrary. Also, I'm not mad about anything. Though, I do feel bad for you from time to time. Anyway, the mean ole repeater owners aren't going anywhere. Find a new hobby or get over it. WRXB215, AdmiralCochrane and Stone 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaise Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 5 minutes ago, marcspaz said: You seem to be the angry one. Like, I think you might need therapy after reading that pathetic string of posts. You can't win the debate with facts to back your opinion, so you start name-calling, being vulgar and antagonistic. A true sign that you are losing and angry about it. Hey, my ignore list just grew to six, and now this thread is much less aggravating... I highly recommend it! wrci350 and marcspaz 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQC527 Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 2 hours ago, Blaise said: Hey, my ignore list just grew to six, and now this thread is much less aggravating... I highly recommend it! WRUU653, tjcloer, WRXB215 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRUE951 Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 4 hours ago, marcspaz said: I knew you didn't have it in you.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQD922 Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 This guy just doesn’t know when to stop. WRXB215, wrci350 and marcspaz 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQC527 Posted July 16 Report Share Posted July 16 3 hours ago, WRQD922 said: This guy just doesn’t know when to stop. Mostly because people keep responding to him. It's like trying to reason with a jammer on a repeater. WRUU653, wrci350, WRXB215 and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSCN901 Posted July 16 Report Share Posted July 16 17 hours ago, WRQC527 said: Mostly because people keep responding to him. It's like trying to reason with a jammer on a repeater. You don't reason with jammers... you beg big brother FCC to do something about it in hopes that they'll use their one enforcement act a year to send the jammer a mean letter, which someone will then post on here as proof that the FCC is going to send $50k fines to everyone that keys up a UV-5R on GMRS frequencies. marcspaz, SteveShannon and WRUU653 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRXR255 Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 3 hours ago, WSCN901 said: You don't reason with jammers... you beg big brother FCC to do something about it in hopes that they'll use their one enforcement act a year to send the jammer a mean letter, which someone will then post on here as proof that the FCC is going to send $50k fines to everyone that keys up a UV-5R on GMRS frequencies. And remind them as they get their door kicked in, their dog(s) shot, and their kids Spongebob Squarepants walkie talkies confiscated, that it has saved democracy. Raybestos 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSCE577 Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 OK, so I am joining this topic way late, but I read through most of the comments. My question is that a video on here stated that a Baofeng radio could not be used legally on GMRS unless you had a HAM license in addition to a GMRS license. Is that a transmit power thing or is it bunk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OffRoaderX Posted July 17 Author Report Share Posted July 17 6 minutes ago, WSCE577 said: My question is that a video on here stated that a Baofeng radio could not be used legally on GMRS unless you had a HAM license in addition to a GMRS license. Is that a transmit power thing or is it bunk? Depends on the Baofeng radio. If it is a Baofeng HAM radio, then the FCCs says it cannot be used on GMRS. If it is a Baofeng GMRS radio then IF you have a GMRS license, the FCCs says you can use it on GMRS. The question you should be asking is, does anyone, including the FCCs, care? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQC527 Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 47 minutes ago, WSCE577 said: a video on here stated that a Baofeng radio could not be used legally on GMRS unless you had a HAM license in addition to a GMRS license. I would literally pay a small amount of cash to see that video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 1 hour ago, OffRoaderX said: The question you should be asking is, does anyone, including the FCCs, care? I'll take "Questions Answered with 'No' " for $800, Alex. Stone, OffRoaderX, TrucksNCoffee and 3 others 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OffRoaderX Posted August 21 Author Report Share Posted August 21 Today's update: TL;DW: Linked repeater networks in Texas, Arizona, North Carlina and Arkansas have shut down in the last 24 hours. gortex2, WRYZ926, TrikeRadio and 3 others 4 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkInTampa Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 From the admin of GMRSLive posted today.... WRUE951, TrucksNCoffee and WRXB215 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 4 hours ago, OffRoaderX said: Today's update: TL;DW: Linked repeater networks in Texas, Arizona, North Carlina and Arkansas have shut down in the last 24 hours. Im not going to lie... sometimes I'm the "some people" identified in your closing statement. BUT... in my defense, as soon as everyone realizes I am always right, we will all get along much better. SteveShannon, WRYZ926, Raybestos and 2 others 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quarterwave Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 Anyone here know anything about linking 2 repeaters together? I think it would be an awesome idea, and I just thought of it. Any info out there? (Sarcasm 100% intended). WRQC527, amaff, tjcloer and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRQC527 Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 30 minutes ago, quarterwave said: Anyone here know anything about linking 2 repeaters together? I think it would be an awesome idea, and I just thought of it. Any info out there? (Sarcasm 100% intended). I've often thought about it. I think it's a great idea. From what I've read, especially here, there seems to be not only universal support for the idea, but very clear rules set forth by the FCC concerning implementation. I say let's try it! What's the worst that can happen. SteveShannon, Raybestos and WRUU653 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRHS218 Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 1 hour ago, quarterwave said: (Sarcasm 100% intended). Be careful, some people (no "") do not care for sarcasm, humor, nor fun of any kind. I read it in another thread on this forum. It would appear forums should be limited to the dry exchange of non opinionated data. I believe this would provide a safer place for all involved and I, for one, would welcome it. WRQC527, SteveShannon and WRUU653 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRUU653 Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 6 minutes ago, WRHS218 said: Be careful, some people (no "") do not care for sarcasm, humor, nor fun of any kind. I read it in another thread on this forum. It would appear forums should be limited to the dry exchange of non opinionated data. I believe this would provide a safer place for all involved and I, for one, would welcome it. That’s right, I forgot about that post… something about how we’re not supposed to have any fun. Come on now people get serious SteveShannon and WRHS218 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 1 hour ago, WRHS218 said: Be careful, some people (no "") do not care for sarcasm, humor, nor fun of any kind. I read it in another thread on this forum. It would appear forums should be limited to the dry exchange of non opinionated data. I believe this would provide a safer place for all involved and I, for one, would welcome it. 1 hour ago, WRUU653 said: That’s right, I forgot about that post… something about how we’re not supposed to have any fun. Come on now people get serious Wait... what? What did I miss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRUU653 Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 (edited) 34 minutes ago, marcspaz said: Wait... what? What did I miss? https://forums.mygmrs.com/topic/6252-time-to-get-serious/?_rid=9445 I think there was another one that was specifically about the forum but I’m not sure. You gotta have humor in life though… I think anyway. Edited August 21 by WRUU653 Additional comment marcspaz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 @WRUU653 wow! I did miss that one! Thanks for the link. WRUU653 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveShannon Posted August 21 Report Share Posted August 21 1 hour ago, marcspaz said: @WRUU653 wow! I did miss that one! Thanks for the link. Yeah, apparently I missed the original post too. Such hubris. WRUU653 and marcspaz 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.