OffRoaderX Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 1 minute ago, NavyBOFH said: You're famous because you ARE a moron. Plain and simple. Thanks for the cheap entertainment and enjoy your click/view revenue, now dance for your dollar. See what I mean @marcspaz? Some of these little fellas just make it too easy. I mean, what kind of a person would get so worked up over videos that nobody is forcing them to watch? Fish..in..bucket... marcspaz, WRYZ926, WRCQ487 and 3 others 2 4 Quote
Guest Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 1 minute ago, OffRoaderX said: See what I mean @marcspaz? Some of these little fellas just make it too easy. I mean, what kind of a person would get so worked up over videos that nobody is forcing them to watch? Fish..in..bucket... I don't watch - I just pop my head in here to see the herpes has spread. Good job commenting towards a similar person that cannot read legal text based on their previous comments. No wonder this forum is full of pissy "Sad GoMeRS" that finally had the rug swept out from under them. Just yell "free men don't ask" in the mirror a few times and maybe you'll feel better, sweetheart. Quote
marcspaz Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 35 minutes ago, NavyBOFH said: So... you were saying? The rules clearly dictate the 467 frequencies are to be ONLY used as uplink to a repeater or in "test cases". No it doesn't. It doesn't say that at all. I can read. It says only mobile, hand-held portable, control and fixed stations may transmit on these 8 channels. Not that those are the only allowed repeater inputs. Quote
marcspaz Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 44 minutes ago, NavyBOFH said: You're famous because you ARE a moron. Plain and simple. Thanks for the cheap entertainment and enjoy your click/view revenue, now dance for your dollar. Not only is that kinda mean... I am starting to think you aren't as smart as you pretend to be. WRQD922 and OffRoaderX 1 1 Quote
marcspaz Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 11 minutes ago, NavyBOFH said: Mobile, hand-held portable and control stations may transmit on these channels only when communicating through a repeater station or making brief test transmissions in accordance with § 95.319(c). I bolded it for you in case your glasses aren't working! You are correct. Those station types can only transmit on those frequencies when they are communicating through a repeater. Its not that they can't transmit on any other frequencies. It is to prevent those device types from having simplex communications on those frequencies... that is it. When it comes to laws and rules, anything not expressly prohibited is allowed. There is no expressed prohibition on repeater inputs being on any other channel/frequency. Also, its a good indication that you know you are loosing the debate when you stop discussing opinion based on fact and switch to insults and attacks. Just for future reference... WRXB215 1 Quote
marcspaz Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 @NavyBOFH I understand you are trying to help. I do... but you aren't the only guy in the room. I studied Constitutional law for years and helped write bills that have gone to my state legislature for votes. I work for a massive firm, engineer solutions and write technical contracts for a living. I can read and comprehend the rules in the totality and there are definitions of words that contradict the means and methods those words are used in the rules. The definition of Operate (in brief) is to start, continue and stop a station from transmitting, and the rules state you can execute remote operation over a network (again, paraphrasing). Then there are other rules that say you can't convey messages over the air and wireline. So, which is it? We can remote operate over a network or we can't? You can't justify interpreting a definition of a word in a sentence when the definition is specifically and explicitly provided in the rules. The contradiction needs to be fixed and the rules updated. An SA telling a web admin to change a webpage isn't the way to clarify a conflict in the rules. Quote
OffRoaderX Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 20 minutes ago, NavyBOFH said: considering the C&D letters Where are all these Cease & Desist letters? I'm not seeing them in the FCC's enforcement/actions listings, nor have I seen anyone talking/discussing ever receiving one? Quote
Guest Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 Edited because @marcspaz is too feeble to comprehend a meme Quote
marcspaz Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 3 hours ago, NavyBOFH said: Someone else can take up the torch of getting this into a rule change - I'm tapped out. So... talked to a couple friends of mine here in the DC area. We're going to get the ball rolling on this. I appreciate the inspiration. WRDG371, WRUE951 and Davichko5650 2 1 Quote
WRYZ926 Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 WOW, I spent most of the day at my local VA hospital to come home to all of this. I'll keep my inter-service rivalry comments to myself (for now). And it looks like I can add another to my ignore list too. @OffRoaderX, @marcspaz, @SteveShannon and others are very intelligent and do their research. I might not always agree with them but I do always take into account what they have to say. SteveShannon, marcspaz, WRQD922 and 3 others 4 1 1 Quote
OffRoaderX Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 30 minutes ago, WRYZ926 said: @OffRoaderX, .... and others are very intelligent and do their research. Lets not get carried away and jump to any conclusions.. SteveShannon, marcspaz, WRXB215 and 2 others 5 Quote
WRUU653 Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 25 minutes ago, WRYZ926 said: I might not always agree with them but I do always take into account what they have to say. I’m right there with you. Here’s my takeaway from this thread… first make popcorn and second… I find it easier to listen to someone I don’t agree with that is respectful than someone I agree with that is being rude. SteveShannon, marcspaz, wayoverthere and 2 others 4 1 Quote
WRYZ926 Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 54 minutes ago, OffRoaderX said: Lets not get carried away and jump to any conclusions.. Sorry about that. I would hate to ruin your reputation And I try not to assume anything because we all know what assume means. WRUU653 and SteveShannon 1 1 Quote
OffRoaderX Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 10 minutes ago, NavyBOFH said: Otherwise that was the most childish passive aggressive “look at me” moment for any grown man to bear witness to. Correction.. 2nd most.. SteveShannon and marcspaz 2 Quote
marcspaz Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 Edit: Never mind. Its not worth it. OffRoaderX 1 Quote
OffRoaderX Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 2 minutes ago, marcspaz said: I am saying this is the friendliest possible way I can... if that is your best brag... you should probably stop. It really was pretty much the most obvious and pitiful “look at me” moment for any grown man to bear witness to. I swear "some people" are just plain broken. marcspaz 1 Quote
marcspaz Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 3 minutes ago, NavyBOFH said: And you seem to literally get off on this weird internet troll fetish. I’d find an insult for you, but I was raised not to bully the retarded. Bless your heart. No different than you living up to your namesake. Name calling and juvenile behavior doesn't help anything. Like I said earlier, insults and personal attacks indicate you know you're losing the debate. You're trying to discredit your disputant in absence of valid points to support your position. Be an adult and let it go. Quote
Guest Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 Keep complaining about conduct with constant trolling. I’m almost there… Quote
marcspaz Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 8 hours ago, NavyBOFH said: I gave my valid points, now I’ll troll like the rest of y’all. Dude... are you threatening me? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.