marcspaz Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 56 minutes ago, SteveShannon said: Although I am not a fan of linking, what you quoted is not the written rule. That’s the FCC interpretation of the written rules. It does reference the actual rules it interprets (95.1733 and 95.1749) however. ^^^ This! Exactly this! There is nothing in the rules that explains 'why' the rule is what it is. There are several conflicting parts and sub-parts, that I have pointed out in the past, that support that 'linking' as a whole is not prohibited. Only a specific method is prohibited. Whatever is not expressly prohibited is allowed. The truth is, I may retire this year. If I do, my time would be freed up enough to stand-up a linked repeater network and then wait to see if the FCC is up to a lively debate in Federal court. I don't know if I will, but the opportunity would exist and lately I am feeling kinda spicy about government overreach. Don't get me wrong. I have no personal animosity toward anyone in the FCC for simply trying to do their job and I have no intent on purposefully and intentionally violating any federal laws or rules... but we need a court case to settle the debate. All I have seen from everyone, including the FCC staff, is conjecture and opinion based on something that is NOT written, implicitly nor implied. SteveShannon, Davichko5650 and Radioguy7268 1 2 Quote
Davichko5650 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 14 hours ago, WRKC935 said: No debate.... 45 all the way. In a 1911. Accept no substitute We can agree to agree on this one. Even my wife prefers my .45 to a 9 or a .380. (note - own all 3) She comes from a family of Moose hunters so very proficient with small arms. Quote
WRXL702 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago So - The FCC Authored The Part 95 Rules, But Cannot Interpret What They Wrote ? Also, You Are Stating That The Mobility Division Of The WTB, Which Is An Authorized Division Of The FCC, Should Not Post Rules, Regulations Or Interpretations. Don't Think So. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-395324A1.pdf https://www.fcc.gov/wireless-telecommunications Quote
OffRoaderX Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago "some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care. "some people" should bicker over something that actually matters. Davichko5650 and marcspaz 2 Quote
marcspaz Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, OffRoaderX said: "some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care. "some people" should bicker over something that actually matters. Bickering implies that a counter position is taken because I care about the other persons opinion and how it reflects on me and my initial position.... which definitely is not the case. LoL /wordsalad OffRoaderX 1 Quote
WRXL702 Posted 59 minutes ago Report Posted 59 minutes ago 2 hours ago, OffRoaderX said: "some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care. "some people" should bicker over something that actually matters. Well There You Go........ An Opinion By "Some People" About An Opinion Where Their Opinion Doesn't Actually Matter - Except To "Some People." Now I Understand......... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.