Fixed Station vs Base Station?

[marcspaz]

56 minutes ago, SteveShannon said:

Although I am not a fan of linking, what you quoted is not the written rule.  That’s the FCC interpretation of the written rules.  It does reference the actual rules it interprets (95.1733 and 95.1749) however. 

 

 

^^^  This!  Exactly this!

 

There is nothing in the rules that explains 'why' the rule is what it is.  There are several conflicting parts and sub-parts, that I have pointed out in the past, that support that 'linking' as a whole is not prohibited.  Only a specific method is prohibited.  Whatever is not expressly prohibited is allowed.

 

The truth is, I may retire this year.  If I do, my time would be freed up enough to stand-up a linked repeater network and then wait to see if the FCC is up to a lively debate in Federal court.  I don't know if I will, but the opportunity would exist and lately I am feeling kinda spicy about government overreach.

 

Don't get me wrong.  I have no personal animosity toward anyone in the FCC for simply trying to do their job and I have no intent on purposefully and intentionally violating any federal laws or rules... but we need a court case to settle the debate.  All I have seen from everyone, including the FCC staff, is conjecture and opinion based on something that is NOT written, implicitly nor implied. 

[Davichko5650]

14 hours ago, WRKC935 said:

No debate.... 45 all the way.  In a 1911.  Accept no substitute

 

We can agree to agree on this one.  Even my wife prefers my .45 to a 9 or a .380. (note - own all 3)  She comes from a family of Moose hunters so very proficient with small arms.

[WRXL702]

So - The FCC Authored The Part 95 Rules, But Cannot Interpret What They Wrote ?

Also, You Are Stating That The Mobility Division Of The WTB, Which Is An Authorized Division Of The FCC, Should Not Post Rules, Regulations Or Interpretations.

Don't Think So.

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-395324A1.pdf

https://www.fcc.gov/wireless-telecommunications

[OffRoaderX]

"some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care.

"some people" should bicker over something that actually matters.

[marcspaz]

2 hours ago, OffRoaderX said:

"some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care.

"some people" should bicker over something that actually matters.

 

Bickering implies that a counter position is taken because I care about the other persons opinion and how it reflects on me and my initial position.... which definitely is not the case. LoL

 

/wordsalad

[WRXL702]

2 hours ago, OffRoaderX said:

"some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care.

"some people" should bicker over something that actually matters.

Well There You Go........

An Opinion By "Some People" About An Opinion Where Their Opinion Doesn't Actually Matter - Except To "Some People." 
 

Now I Understand.........

[WSHH887]

8 hours ago, OffRoaderX said:

"some people" are so funny, all trying to prove who's smarter over something that does not matter in any way - The FCC doesn't even care.

"some people" should bicker over something that actually matters.

Hey, I tried to drift the thread to .45 acp versus 9mm.  

[marcspaz]

17 minutes ago, WSHH887 said:

Hey, I tried to drift the thread to .45 acp versus 9mm.  

 

There is zero chance of that happening. Even the most diehard 9mm owners love and respect The Lord's caliber. 

[amaff]

1 hour ago, marcspaz said:

 

There is zero chance of that happening. Even the most diehard 9mm owners love and respect The Lord's caliber. 

It's the kind of rivalry where only 1 side thinks it's a rivalry

[SteveShannon]

10 hours ago, WRXL702 said:

So - The FCC Authored The Part 95 Rules, But Cannot Interpret What They Wrote ?

All regulatory agencies interpret their rules to their favor, from the ATF to the other end of the list. FCC is no different. Unlike some of the other agencies they don’t seem to enforce their interpretations very often. 

10 hours ago, WRXL702 said:

Also, You Are Stating That The Mobility Division Of The WTB, Which Is An Authorized Division Of The FCC, Should Not Post Rules, Regulations Or Interpretations.

Don't Think So.

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-395324A1.pdf

https://www.fcc.gov/wireless-telecommunications

I have no idea how you reached such a conclusion, and it’s not worthwhile trying. I’m glad they post both the rules and the regulations . I even agree with many of their interpretations.

[LeoG]

We know all about the Chevron Doctrine.  Where the regulatory agencies decided they could be judge, jury, court and prosecutor of all decisions.  And then make sure all the "fees" are made payable to them.

[Hoppyjr]

Threads like this have me thinking some of y’all have never seen a naked woman.