All Activity
- Past hour
-
How many fars on the Maljamar, NM repeater?
nokones replied to WSFE293's question in Technical Discussion
100 miles is nothing. There is one of the Queen's favorite viewers in California that can do 200 miles with ease. Seriously, the average terrain elevation in the area of the Maljamar is somewhat flat and approximately 4,000 AMSL and the Maljamar repeater site appears to be sitting at the 4,121 ft level. With the curvature of this great planet and the fact that the propagation of the UHF signal essentially requires a " Line-of -Sight", I highly doubt that the area of coverage footprint is anywhere near a hundred miles. You would essentially, need a site approx. 10-13K in elevation above the average elevation of 4K to have the range of 100 miles with an UHF signal. Even a microwave control path, peak to peak would have difficulties in making it that distance because of the earth curvature. In this case, the 100 mile range of this site is very arbitrary. - Today
-
AdmiralCochrane reacted to a post in a topic: Baofeng and Baofeng Tech
-
How many fars on the Maljamar, NM repeater?
AdmiralCochrane replied to WSFE293's question in Technical Discussion
Both likely to work, the 50 watt radio will sound louder. -
New to GMRS world looking for advise buying first radio
OffRoaderX replied to WSCC962's topic in General Discussion
Oh, my! That sounds serious! Can you tell us more about what will happen if he (or anyone) makes a pest of themself? -
WRHS218 reacted to an answer to a question: Do repeaters have to be part 95 accepted
-
WRHS218 reacted to an answer to a question: Help with KG-935G Plus Programming & Repeater Setup – Debug Assertion Failed Error
-
New to GMRS world looking for advise buying first radio
Ian replied to WSCC962's topic in General Discussion
That radio is currently the GOAT but it’s a ham radio, so be aware that it’s freebanding, and if you’re going to do that, you’re not allowed to make a pest of yourself or you might actually get in the shit — only break one rule at a time! BTech has a beastly 50 watt unit which uses the same software as the Vero, and a GMRS Pro, which is probably still more radio than you need, but Vero software is super easy compared to the alternative menu and manual stuff! -
Ian reacted to a post in a topic: New to GMRS world looking for advise buying first radio
-
Ian reacted to a post in a topic: Midland Waiver Approval
-
Ian reacted to a post in a topic: Midland Waiver Approval
-
Ian reacted to a post in a topic: Midland Waiver Approval
-
Ian reacted to a post in a topic: Midland Waiver Approval
-
WSIY246 joined the community
-
yall are too funny....lol
-
Went to the website and found this. And then found this about the HDG antenna So much for the informational insert inside the box
-
LeoG started following Do repeaters have to be part 95 accepted
-
Do repeaters have to be part 95 accepted
LeoG replied to Elkhunter521's question in Technical Discussion
Btech RPT50 -
Beautiful dog.
-
WSIP993 joined the community
-
It sounds like the Baofeng just doesn't have the "legs" to reach the repeater. Even given the same nominal wattage, some radios just have a little better reach than others.
-
WSIY401 joined the community
-
Do repeaters have to be part 95 accepted
WRTS781 replied to Elkhunter521's question in Technical Discussion
I believe the kenwood TKR-830 was part 95 according to repeaterbuilder.com, however the tkr-830 is a full duplex radio meant for a trunking system; takes some hacking to make it a stand alone repeater. -
WRTS781 joined the community
- Yesterday
-
PezRaton joined the community
-
Ah, thanks! So that means my first Tx hit the repeater and it responded with its call-sign in Morse-code. The Baofeng also received the call-sign, but it is not receiving the Tx from the Wouxun KGS-88G. Nor does the Wouxun receive transmission from the Baofeng. All is well in simplex land.
-
Question re: grounding for lightning protection
tcp2525 replied to WRTC928's question in Technical Discussion
Yawn, looks like you got me, Einstein! I would never directly ground a radio with 500 MCM as it's best to feed your primary bonding plate with 500 MCM and then, yes then, reduce to a home run of 250 MCM to each fixed equipment rack. https://www.gordonelectricsupply.com/p/Harger-223T-Tin-Flange-Bonding-Plate/6096051 But, we ground each of our Baofeng handhelds with 4/0 THHN for maximum flexibility. -
Question re: grounding for lightning protection
WRKC935 replied to WRTC928's question in Technical Discussion
Again, where are you placing the surge suppressor's? They typically are inside the structure, either directly mounted to or wired to a ground bar located right at the entry point. Surge suppressors are a serviceable item, so they need to be exposed to be replaced after they fire and short. Not wrapped in putty and tape outside. Where do you come up with this crap? -
Question re: grounding for lightning protection
WRKC935 replied to WRTC928's question in Technical Discussion
Even though this is about as far from the truth as I can imagine, I am gonna give you to benefit of the doubt to explain this, WITH links to real documentation proving what you are saying is true. Even if I know it's BS and in truth NOT EVEN possible. I mean seriously, just give me a part number for the Burndy lug that's a single .25 (1/4 inch) hole that I can connect to an MTR repeater ground screw. Let along the one for a 10-32 screw hole that would be on a radio. Never mind getting the 500 bent into shape to connect to the radio. I have to see this. Do you have pictures? Are you using the 500 cable as the method to mount the radios on a desk? -
blbass409 joined the community
-
WRTB851 joined the community
-
Its easiest to start with the pre-programmed channels so you can see what they look like in CHIRP.. Once you figure that out you can then create your own new, custom channels. Re Tone or TSql, i believe @SteveShannon already answered that question in your other post, and because he is an officially-recognized HERD, you should listen to what he says.
-
And you are doing exactly what is expected when considering buying a disposable radio. No shame in buying a Midland if it makes you feel good and it gets the job done.
-
No assumption, people buy cheap tools from Harbor Freight with the intention of using it once to get a certain job done and throw it in the storage bin when done with the intention of possibly using it in the future. They generally forget about it and it gets tossed in the trash accidentally or intentionally. The same concept applies to these disposable or throwaway radios we buy. Case in point, I bought a Baofeng UV82 10+ years back for under $50 with the intention that it is a sacrificial radio, or disposable as we like to call them. The damn thing far exceeded my expectations of performance and survivability of abuse and is still in use today and doesn't YET warrant going into the scrap bucket. As for Midland, these radios are generally mistakenly purchased solely by name recognition or not taking the time to fully researching prior to purchasing. People see the flashy ads on the seller's site and go for it. Sadly, the majority of Midland purchasers learn the hard way that they made a costly mistake and finally wise up and never buy another Midland product again. In Midland's defense, their marketing is strong enough to bring in enough one-time customers to survive. A moth going back to the flame a second time is delusional.
-
How many fars on the Maljamar, NM repeater?
SteveShannon replied to WSFE293's question in Technical Discussion
The output power isn’t meaningless, but it has much less of an effect than the antenna height and gain. A 20 watt radio can easily transmit 100 miles if there are no obstructions, but obstructions are common. A fifty watt radio cannot overcome obstructions, but it can power its way through vegetation which might attenuate the signal of a less powerful radio until it cannot be detected. There are lots of threads which discuss which antennas work well and how and where to mount them. And attenuation affects signals in both directions. So, more important than the output power is the cable, the antenna gain, the antenna mounting position, and the antenna height. Personally I use a db20g radio with a Midland MXTA26 antenna on the center of my steel roof using a magnetic mount from Midland. -
How many fars on the Maljamar, NM repeater?
OffRoaderX replied to WSFE293's question in Technical Discussion
You spelt farz wrong. -
I know, another newbie question about fars...but I'm looking for some input from others with a some experience. I was playing around on the repeater map and found the Maljamar, NM repeater says estimated range of 100 miles. What equipment would be needed on a mobile car setup to get to the repeater from 100 miles away? Would a 25W radio be enough power or would a 50W radio be needed? What about an antenna with gain? I realize that this probably depends on many things but hoping to hear about if this is realistically possible. I looked at the RF Line of Sight website and assumed the repeater is 100m high (no idea if this is accurate) and it says there is clear line of sight to Carlsbad and Roswell. Has anyone here used this repeater before? The reason I'm asking is because I'm looking into getting a mobile setup but just haven't pulled the trigger yet. The posting from a few weeks about about mobile setup is really useful. Thanks, hope you all have a good Fourth of July.
-
I already have been thinking about that problem for my (likely) purchase of the T75 units…and my plan is blaze orange duck tape, or a tag, or something, to help with that exact problem in my very dense woods. In the same vein, I love the idea of camo Rite in the Rain pads…but during hunting season I switched to the blaze orange of those too after I almost lost one of those this fall lol. Funny thing (and I whole-heartedly agree with @SteveShannon here!), I actually have a pair of cheap lightly water-resistant baofengs I intend to use while sailing on a local lake to talk back to shore…because they’re cheap enough I almost consider them disposable! If I drown it, oh well, $10 lost and move on. The reason is, the GOOD waterproof units are out of price range for me, so a waterproof box I already had and cheap HT meet my use case there, and good high quality middle-priced Midlands should the rest of the time when I need better features that aren’t necessary on the water. Back to the point if this thread though, again, for wx alert features, if that’s your main goal, and you want something to rely your safety on, personally I recommend spending more $$$ there (Midland or otherwise) if you know you’ll get a more reliable product. Knowing if its reliable is up to the many interpretations that I’m sure will be weighing in below (), but in general that’s my $0.02 worth
-
If you set the mode to “Tone”, the Tone Squelch frequency setting becomes meaningless. Tone mode means your radio doesn’t (or isn’t supposed to) filter on receive. Tone mode is the same as having no receiver tone. If you want the Tone Squelch setting to be effective you must set mode to TSQL. As far as the random offset frequency, when you transmit are you on 467.725 MHz? If so, the offset doesn’t matter. The best way to ensure your radio works with the repeater is to get on the air and test it. The issues above may be things that the chirp developers would explain better than I can.
-
Hello everyone, I’m running into a consistent programming issue with my Wouxun KG-935G Plus using CHIRP. Here’s what’s happening: I program my repeater channels with: Correct RX frequency (e.g. 462.xxx MHz) Tone Mode: Tone Tone and Tone Squelch matching (e.g. both 131.8 Hz) Duplex set to “+” for standard GMRS repeater +5 MHz offset Problem: After saving and reopening the file: Tone Squelch reverts to 88.5 Hz on all channels, even though I set a different CTCSS. Duplex changes to “split” and TX Offset shows random frequencies like 930.1 MHz, instead of standard +5 MHz. I’ve tried: Re-entering and saving multiple times Clicking another field to lock before saving Using the latest CHIRP daily build (if compatible) Confirming the radio model and cable are correct Question: Has anyone else experienced this issue with the KG-935G Plus or similar models in CHIRP? Is there a known fix or workaround to retain Tone Squelch and Duplex settings correctly? I want to ensure my repeater channels are reliable for daily and emergency comms. Any insights would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.