tweiss3

Use a PL tone and never hear him again?

You mean one can be licensed in multiple categories by the FCC and carry multiple call signs? /scarcasm

Who says linking requires internet or telephone connection?

@kidphc Long term impressions? What about battery life? I've still got an eye on these.

This can already be done with any digital mode Fldigi has. There is a mobile version for android phones, and it works pretty well. Our ARES team uses it weekly after the net to send all the announcements in text format using MT63 with a 2000 pass band.

I don't remember reading about this portion of the 40m band last time I went through Part 97. In relation to Voice & Image privileges for 7.075 thru 7.100, read 97.305(c) with footnote 97.307(f)(11), and then 97.301(e). Hawaii, and likely part of Alaska, technicians get 40 meter privileges within the CW portion of the band. I likely glossed over this previously as it doesn't relate to me. I may still turn the radio on to see if I can hear them, though I would not be permitted to respond.

The real reason is an attempt to "stupid proof" the services. They want to force you to deliberately make an effort to transmit on the service you intend to use. If you had a mismash of frequencies from multiple service scanning at once, the chances of you responding to the wrong service with the wrong call sign is very high. If you have 2 different radios, you deliberately grab the GMRS microphone and transmit on the intended frequency. Now, it has happened to even the experienced operators, grabbing the wrong microphone and using the wrong call sign. Are there good best management practices that can be used to minimize the cross use of services, and tossing out the incorrect call sign? Sure there are, but how many new licensees have enough trouble understanding how to program a single repeater, let alone run zones/scan lists/etc. Now toss in inexperience, and difficulty reading the rules directly from eCFR. It is much easier to say separate radio for each service than to try to write BMPs into the code as hard and fast regulations.

I'd call Rohn and talk to them about your specific site constraints. With all the rock, they might be able to help you with a matt foundation that would work for your loading scenario. It would still be reinforced, but would be wider than the standard foundation, and much shallower (maybe 2'), and could be placed directly on the bedrock, however deep that is (assuming its barely under the topsoil). I would buy a new base for imbedding in the concrete unless you want to use the bottom section as your base.

I have a feeling they are looking at the $1500 Garmin Tread with Group Ride and realize they aren't going to beat Garmin at their own game, but also realize they they currently have a market with deep pockets (jeep guys) that are likely to spend similar money if they get some published advantage over Garmin, even if it's actual implementation isn't seamless.

I find this section hilarious, because in this technical memo requesting the waiver, they acknowledge that range is an issue with HTs, however, they continue to advertise their FRS radios with range of "up to 20 miles" and their GMRS HTs with a range of "up to 36 miles".

The RHINO uses 5W, while Midland's waiver allows for 50W usage, and to allow for mobile radios with detachable antennas to be used.

No, it was requested in 2021, granted 7/24/2023.

I was made aware of this on another forum. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-23-633A1.pdf I know the "new channels" discussion got heated, this ought to get some discussion flowing. Lets hope this doesn't become an annoyance with pavement princesses texting and transmitting their location every 10 seconds.

This is part of SSB operation 101.

Part 97 only requires testing from manufacturers to ensure they don't produce 20,000 units that are junk and spewing spurious emissions (though, it still happens). There is no testing requirements for an amateur licensee to get testing, however, part 97 is very clear on spurious emissions: § 97.307 Emission standards

NE Ohio to SE Tennessee. I was using my 705 with my Little Tarheel II with the TuneMatic controller. I decided to keep it on 6m this trip for simplicity.

I just did a 550 mile trip (one way) and had 6m scanning all the time, including calling frequencies and every 6m repeater along the drive. I heard a few IDs, but zero activity sadly.

Woke up to one storm this past week in the middle of nowhere. Information was better jumping on the Skywarn net than NOAA. I did listen to both, but having zero internet access, it was easier to get information from someone on the net who could look at the radar and using their experience to see how long the storm will hang around.

I have it in the car. Better to listen to the updates on the road then mess with the phone. Don't use alerts, and don't use it very often, but it's nice to have when needed, especially traveling in unfamiliar places.

Typically you test it with a dummy load on the output, and you can leave the RX unattached. Just keep your duty cycle down (in accordance with your dummy load rating) and watch out, it will get hot.

Ohio just passed new distracted driving laws as well. The biggest thing is it can now be a primary offence for being pulled over, but there are some odd things in the rules, such as you can use a cell phone and hold it up to your ear, but cannot hold it for GPS usage.

Agreed. My truck is 6'5" to the roof, add the 2/70B spring, and I'm not concerned about the 7'2" garage heights I am stuck with. Sure, it hits, but still looks brand new.

How has it been working for you? How is the bluetooth programming?

I've noticed that problem before too, not exclusive to Motorola as it showed up on my Kenwood HT over P25. I think it is more related to the Noise Suppression (or ANR in Kenwood) in low background noise situations. ANR is designed to cancel out sirens and industrial noise like fire truck pumps, and when its looking to remove a loud noise that isn't there, it causes problems.

That's a smoking deal. I'm jealous......