Jump to content

WyoJoe

Members
  • Posts

    419
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by WyoJoe

  1. 30 minutes ago, WROZ437 said:

    I think it’s more that I bought the MXT115 before really doing a whole lot of research. The MXT115 was inexpensive enough that I didn’t sweat the purchase too much. After the fact I started diving a little deeper and learned about some of the shortcomings of Midland stuff like no wideband, limited features, etc. The radio will do everything I need it to do. 

    I’ll heed the advice of you, @PACNWComms, and the others who replied above and stick with what I have for now. Even with that being the case, all the replies in this thread have help me gain more understanding. Maybe I’ll snag a decent handheld at some point….

     

    In the case of the MXT115, if/when you are looking for more features and functions, an inexpensive upgrade is the Anytone AT779UV / Radioddity DB-20G / Retevis RA25 radio (each of these is the same as the others). For about $100, you get another small radio that puts out ~20W, offers narrow and wideband, repeater capable, and offers UHF and VHF receive capability. It can also be reconfigured so it will work on the 2m and 70cm ham bands, should you ever wish to pursue, or if you already have, a ham license. It also has a small, but useful, color display.

    On top of all that, it even comes with a "Fun" button on it! What more could you ask for? Okay, the "Fun" button is actually the "Function" button, but the word Function didn't fit on the small button.

  2. On 1/19/2022 at 3:04 PM, gman1971 said:

    Yeah, as for the Microsoft... I know exactly the feeling, that is why I am staying on Windows 7. I have a machine that should last me no problem to the end of the decade, if not more, for what I need to do with it; and then, I'll see if M$$ has gotten their heads out of their rear ends with Windows 12 or 13, or whatever, or even if its even still in business...

    I pretty much stopped using M$ operating systems at home several years ago, and am using Linux Mint instead. It has software to do almost everything I use a computer for, and will even run a lot of Windows applications using the Wine compatibility layer. I have several radio programming applications that I've run on it successfully.

    The only things I use Windows computers for (other than at work) are TurboTax and a couple of old Windows games that I play every once in a while that won't run under Linux. It seems that every time I start my old Windows (8.1) laptop, it wants to run lots of updates that came out since the time before.

  3. 22 hours ago, Over2U said:

    The ‘saving grace’ for GMRS highway use is that there are only 15 frequencies to scan for activity.

    Many of the newer GMRS radios have scan functions built in, so it's pretty easy to scan the channels for activity.

    Some older bubble-pack type radios don't have a scan function as far as I know. It would be a lot harder with one of them...

  4. 13 hours ago, Lscott said:

    Some have even suggested using channel 16, 4 x 4 = 16 because you're driving a 4-wheel drive, as a logical reason. By the way 16 is the VHF marine emergency call channel too. I'm sure others can cook up other "logical" reasons to pick a different channel.

    How about channel 2 for motorcycles; 4 for cars, SUVs, and pickups (or what the truckers call "4 wheelers"); 10 for three-axle box vans; and 18 for your typical 18-wheeler? Perhaps even channel 1 for unicycles...

  5. On 1/14/2022 at 7:03 AM, Sshannon said:

    Section 90.427(b) specifically prohibits programming unauthorized frequencies into a transmitter:

     

    <snip>

    2. Mr. Joe Prepper has every frequency programmed into his portable radio.  He finds a person slumped over in the front seat of their car.  He picks up his portable radio and calls on an EMS dispatch frequency for which he is not authorized.  I believe that even though he potentially saves the life of the person, he has clearly violated 90.427(b) by having his transmitter preprogrammed with unauthorized frequencies.  I’d be surprised if he wasn’t prosecuted.

    It appears that these prohibitions would apply to Part 90 equipment. I haven't investigated this matter, but is there a similar prohibition for Part 97 (amateur radio service) equipment?

  6. On 1/13/2022 at 1:44 PM, n4gix said:

    SS is of course non-taxable, ...

     

    On 1/13/2022 at 2:12 PM, MichaelLAX said:

    You'd better double check that conclusion with your tax advisor.

     

    On 1/14/2022 at 8:25 AM, Sshannon said:

    Social security is taxable income. 

    There are a lot of ways of looking at this. If you live only on Social Security, there is a good possibility that your income is below the threshold for paying federal taxes. Depending on the state in which you reside, you may or may not be exempt from paying taxes on S.S. income. It is entirely possible that you wouldn't pay any income tax if you're on S.S., or you could pay both state and federal income tax on it depending on your overall income situation.

    Obviously, what applies to one may not apply to all. I agree with Michael on this one: check with your tax advisor.

  7. 10 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    I think you mean the Retevis RT85.

     

    On 1/11/2022 at 8:29 PM, WyoJoe said:

    Radioddity does have a clone of the TYT UV-88. It is the RT85 model (dual-band ham radio).

     

    10 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    I think you mean the Retevis RT85.

    Yes, you're correct. That should have said: Retevis Radioddity does have a clone of the TYT UV-88. It is the RT85 model (dual-band ham radio).

  8. 6 hours ago, Citizen said:

    I have the Retevis version of the radio (RT76P), and I bought the battery eliminator for it off Amazon for $11.  Haven't had the need to use it yet, as the battery I have has been outstanding, but having the eliminator for $11 is cheap insurance.

    Here's the Amazon link:

    https://www.amazon.com/Retevis-Charger-Battery-Eliminator-Self-Driving/dp/B08SW433VC

    Tested and work s great.  Should work on all the clones, I think.

    ...

    The RT76P is a similar radio, but is not the same as the others. The batteries and battery eliminator are specific to that model and do not work on the Radioddity/Pofung/TYT/Tidradio versions. If you look at the connections between the battery and radio, you'll see that they're offset on the RT76P, and side-by-side on the others.

    Radioddity does have a clone of the TYT UV-88. It is the RT85 model (dual-band ham radio).

  9. 12 hours ago, dirkvan said:

    Does anyone know of a battery eliminator that works for a GM-30?  I do see one made for the TYT TH-UV88 clone of the GM-30 and wonder if that would work? I'm trying to fins a way to use my GM-30 as a mobile on an upcoming road trip.  Please spare me the lectures on just buying a mobile unit :) thanks!

    I have used my TYT UV-88 battery eliminator with my GM-30, and it works fine, but needs a small modification. In the attached image, I show a GM-30 battery and a UV-88 battery. The UV-88 battery has two red ovals showing the "ribs" on the slot where the battery latch latches. These have to be removed to work with the GM-30. The battery eliminator also has ribs that need to be removed. I used sprue cutters to remove mine, but an exacto knife or utility knife should work equally well.

    If the "ribs" aren't removed, the battery latch will not engage, and the battery or battery eliminator can easily separate from the radio.

    TYT UV88 Battery2.png

  10. 23 hours ago, Tyeandjeff1979 said:

    Anybody have on of these? I'm taming a small amount of land in alaska and I have it pretty well beat it down, but now I need a yard/garden tractor and I just can't stop checking these toy dozers out. Also I think the diy dozer might make good content for my new youtube channel.

    Was there supposed to be a link or a picture or something to give us some idea about what you're asking about? The only "toy" dozers I'm familiar with are from Tonka...

  11. 3 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    I do not know if the GM-30 and the UV-5R have the same gender SMA connector: one may be male and the other female. 

    The UV-5R requires an SMA Female antenna, while the GM-30 requires an SMA Male antenna.

    3 hours ago, WROZ286 said:

    yeah i know i do have two diffrent types of adapters to use but i think i will end up getting an antenna for the gm-30 just to be safe...

    For GMRS use, I'd recommend the Nagoya 771-G from BuyTwoWayRadios.

  12. The technician license primarily allows the use of the VHF and UHF spectrum of the amateur radio band. GMRS operates in the UHF spectrum. Operationally, GMRS and the UHF/VHF spectrum of the amateur band are very similar. The primary differences are the frequency on which they operate, and the way they are commonly used. GMRS is most often, though not always, used within a family or small group (like a 4WD club) where the user is talking to other people nearby that they know for the purpose of communicating within the group. Amateur (ham) radio is often used to talk to others outside of the small group, quite often even to strangers, for the sake of contacting others. With GMRS, the use is usually secondary to other purposes, such as four wheeling, hiking, traveling, etc. With amateur radio, the use is often primary, meaning it is used primarily to make contact with others.

    With GMRS, one license covers the licensee and immediate family, and there is no exam. This makes it convenient for family use, which I believe is the most common usage. You and your son can both operate on the same license, which could be convenient for you.

    With amateur radio, the license only covers the licensee, so, each user needs their own license, for which a test is required. This means that you'll be talking to another licensed ham.

    The equipment is nearly identical between GMRS and the 70 cm. (~440 MHz) UHF amateur band. In many cases, the same equipment will work for both. Many GMRS radios are based on amateur radios, but with modified firmware and Part 95e certification. If you can use one band, you should have no trouble with the other.

  13. 7 hours ago, Blaise said:

    Now if I could only find a way to get the software to let me copy/paste!

     

    It's easy to copy from one line to another on the Anytone version of the software. Since this software works for my radios, I haven't tried the Radioddity version, though I suspect it'll work the same way: Click on the channel number (the line header), the click CTRL-C to copy and CTRL-V to paste. There is no visual clue that this works until you see the line pasted into the software. Using "right click" on the mouse doesn't work (as you might expect it to), but the standard keyboard shortcuts do.

     

  14. On 12/31/2021 at 3:01 AM, rdunajewski said:

    Just in case anyone checks the forums before the main site... we have a new myGMRS!

    ...<snip>...

    Have a Happy New Year!

    Rich,

    I commend you on the new website. It looks great and provides a nice, clean experience. I'm still trying to figure out where everything is on the new site, but I had to do that when I was new to the old site, too. Anyway, I love the new look and feel of the website. Great job on it!

  15. 5 hours ago, W7WMBAE said:

    Want to design a custom interface to the DB20-G through the mic jack.  Unless I'm missing it, there is no schematic to the microphone although I've seen several RJ-45 (8P8C) pinouts that I have not been able to prove.  I know a DB20-G is very similar to Anytone AT-778UV. Appears to be no schematics/maintenance manuals for either radio.  Anyone have any leads or links to the docs?

    Thanks.

    Bill

    The DB20-G is identical to the Anytone AT-779UV. Unfortunately, the AT-779UV and AT-778UV are quite different, and do not share the same microphone pinout. Any information you find for the AT-778UV isn't likely to be helpful.

    You might be in luck, however, as I did find this information on building a programming cable for the AT-779UV (aka DB20-G):

    https://www.miklor.com/COM/UV_ProgrCableAT779.php

    I don't know if that will provide the info you need, but it could at least get you headed in the right direction.

     

  16. 17 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    If you do not leave blanks, you must completely reprogram your radio from scratch; entering repeaters again one by one.

    Michael,

    My version looks very different from what you posted, however, on my version of the KG1000G software, there are arrows that allow you to move your channel selections up and down the list. There are also insert and delete options.

    When I tried to use Insert, it would not insert a new line, so I'm not sure how the insert function works. I also did not try the delete function yet.

     

    What I was able to do, though, was select a blank entry from the end of my channel list, and use the up arrow to move it up to the desired channel position where I wanted to add a new channel. As it moves up the list, the selections it passes move down the list, so nothing is lost.

    That works for me to add blank spaces with relative ease without the need to completely reprogram the radio.

  17. A topic that has come up frequently in other threads is "How do I program my radios if I'm not using Windows?"

    (Thank you Michael LAX for the inspiration for this thread)

    I am not a Mac user, so I'll defer the expertise to others, but the common thread I've seen in this regard is to run an instance of Windows on the Mac using "Parallels." I'll leave the technical details of this to others since I have no experience in this area.

    I'm also not much of a "Virtual Machine" (Parallels, VM Ware, VirtualBox, etc.) user. Virtual Machines basically create a separate environment within the native Operating System (O.S.) in which a "guest" O.S. can be installed. Most often, it seems to be Windows that is installed in that environment, though you could conceivably install almost any O.S. you want. There are some special considerations to be made when using a Virtual Machine, particularly in setting up the programming cables. They need to have the COM ports properly configured, and the cable drivers must be properly installed in order for the programming cable to work. Again I will defer to the experts to chime in to share their experiences with Virtual Machines.

    I am a Linux user, however, and I have used Linux exclusively for my radio programming for several years. Here are some of my experiences using Linux Mint 20 (other versions will be similar):

    Programming Cables: Every programming cable I have tried to use in Linux has worked pretty much "out of the box." The only real difficulty is in knowing what port it's connected to. Typically, it's either ttyUSB0 or ttyUSB1. I can figure that out with a little trial and error.

    Chirp: Chirp is a somewhat universal radio programming application. By universal, I mean that it works on many types of radios and multiple operating systems. Chirp can be installed and run natively on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

    I use the "Flatpak" version of Chirp, since I am running a newer version of Linux Mint, which uses the Python 3 libraries. Chirp is (or, at least, was) heavily dependent upon the Python 2 libraries which are incompatible with Python 3. The way around this is the "Flatpak" which bundles the necessary libraries and the application together in a separate "container" for lack of a better word.

    To install it on the newer versions of Mint, you'll need to use the Software Manager to install the Flatpak application, and if it doesn't also include Flatpak-builder, you might want to install that, too. I'm not sure about the necessity of the second application, but it's installed on my Mint 20 desktop and works well for me.

    Lastly, you'll want to download the latest version of Chirp (in Flatpak format) from the download section at chirp.danplanet.com and install it from the command line with the following command:

    sudo flatpak install ~/Downloads/chirp-daily-20210930.flatpak

    The command assumes your download was saved in the Downloads directory within your Home directory. If not, you'll need to point the installer to the correct path. Finally, replace "chirp-daily-20210930.flatpak" with the name of the file you downloaded.

    Manufacturer CPS: For most of the CPS software that is provided by the radio manufacturers, I run them in Linux using a "compatibility layer" called "WINE." To use it, you have to first install WINE. I did this from the "Software Manager" on Linux Mint. Once installed and configured, WINE will open automatically any time I try to run any Windows application (.exe). It will run in its own Window on my computer, and I do that with the setup programs that come from the radio manufacturers. Once installed, the programs can be run from the WINE selection of the "Mint Menu" or what Windows users think of as the "Start Menu." I sometimes go back to the WINE configuration to tell WINE what version of Windows to emulate. I typically default to Windows 7 for this purpose.

    As with the native Linux configuration, WINE also requires a little configuration to point the "COM port" to the correct USB device that was identified above. This is done by creating a symbolic link in Linux.

    In this case, I can assign "COM 1" to the ttyUSB1 device with the following command:

    ln -s /dev/ttyUSB1 ~/.wine/dosdevices/com1

    Once configured, I select the program from the Mint Menu, and in most cases it will run correctly. Occasionally there are little glitches that make the program difficult to use, such as windows that don't render properly, or fonts that don't display properly. Some of those issues have yet to be resolved in my case, but the software is, more often than not, quite usable even with those issues. I've only had one or two programs that wouldn't run for me, and those were for radios that are supported by Chirp.

     

     

     

     

  18. 23 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    Is (are?) either the TYT or Retevis 9000D radios Part 95e certified for Wideband?

    Michael,

    I haven't looked into this specifically, but I don't believe either of them is so certified. They are not sold as GMRS radios in any configuration I'm aware of (except perhaps as the Midland MXT400), so it's highly unlikely that you'd find one that is certified.

  19. 13 minutes ago, MichaelLAX said:

    Just to satisfy my curiosity, what type plug does that cable use to mate with the Midland MXT400?

    Also: I thought that Midland was a USA alternative to CCRs from prior posts that I have read here, but with all these criticisms of their radios, I wonder now if they are also a CCR?

    The Midland MXT400 looks nearly identical to the TYT TH-9000D (and its Retevis RT9000D clone), and I suspect also looks largely identical on the inside, too. Other than minor cosmetic changes and different firmware, I suspect they're essentially the same radio. I don't have the Midland, and can't confirm this, but I'd be surprised if that wasn't the case.

    If you consider the TYT/Retevis 9000D radios to be CCRs, then the Midland will probably also be considered a CCR. This is based on my expectation that these radios are essentially the same. If anyone believes (or knows) otherwise, please chime in.

  20. 21 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    Do you have access to a DMR repeater so you can avoid a Hotspot for now?

    I am not sure what repeaters near me support DMR, but between home and work, I'm sure there are several. Depending on my level of interest and available time, I may opt for a hotspot sometime soon, too.

  21. 18 hours ago, MichaelLAX said:

    I have no personal experience with Zello-phones (other than using Zello on my iPhone to communicate through @OffRoaderX's repeater), but I think @WyoJoedoes and I see that Amazon is selling an HT model for $59.

    image.thumb.png.936c75191393e2abf16b13b0f544f565.png

    That looks like an interesting device, but alas, as of now, I don't have any experience with Zello. I've thought about looking into it, but as of now, I've been too busy to do so. I'm starting to take an interest in DMR, and may dabble in that as time permits, but that's enough new tech to figure out for now... perhaps next year, after I get a handle on DMR and things settle down a bit, will be a better time to investigate Zello.

  22. On 12/13/2021 at 2:26 PM, Weasleyoc said:

    As a mater of fact they actually do not have any Wouxun radios listed.  

    There are even some models of TID radios that are not listed. The TD-H5 GMRS radio is one such model.

    I think they'd generally want to support their own products before adding other products to their application.

    Certain Baofeng models may be the exception to this rule by virtue of the sheer number of radios sold, which would have a significant impact on the potential audience for this product.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.