Jump to content

Getting 50 watts actually out of repeater


WRYD530

Recommended Posts

So 50 watts is the maximum allowed to transmit on GMRS.  If i setup a repeater with 2 radios  a duplexer and separate antennas for each radio and the best cable i may still lose about 10-20 watts correct? So is there a way to boost the 50 watt radios to actually get the 50 watts out of the transmission?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really.. you have to push all the power before the duplexer, and cheaper/smaller duplexers eat a huge %% of the power. So you will either need to push more power into the duplexer (if it can handle it), or get a better duplexer that doesnt eat so many RF electricities.

HOWEVER - the difference between ~20 watts and 50 watts is probably not going to be noticeable.. I have tested my base setup at 40 watts vs 110 watts, and people at the outskirts of my range (around 60 miles) can't even hear a difference between 40 and 110W ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WRYD530 said:

So 50 watts is the maximum allowed to transmit on GMRS.  If i setup a repeater with 2 radios  a duplexer and separate antennas for each radio and the best cable i may still lose about 10-20 watts correct? So is there a way to boost the 50 watt radios to actually get the 50 watts out of the transmission?

You can't boost the output of the radio to overcome losses downstream from the radio. The FCC limited the radio's output to 50 watts so you have to eat the losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WRYD530 said:

So 50 watts is the maximum allowed to transmit on GMRS.  If i setup a repeater with 2 radios  a duplexer and separate antennas for each radio and the best cable i may still lose about 10-20 watts correct? So is there a way to boost the 50 watt radios to actually get the 50 watts out of the transmission?

If you use a separate antenna for each radio you don’t need a duplexer. The reason for the duplexer is to allow you to simultaneously transmit and receive using a single antenna.
Using separate antennas can be done but requires enough separation between the antennas to achieve a level of RF isolation. That’s usually done by separating them vertically.  I’m not recommending that you do that, just explaining that it can be done. It is one way to overcome the losses incurred by using a duplexer.


But everything Randy (@offroaderx) said is correct.  Better quality duplexers result in less loss and chasing those last several watts makes very little difference. As someone else said in a similar thread recently, many repeater owners run their transmitter outputs at reduced output to ensure long life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sshannon said:

But everything Randy (@offroaderx) said is correct.  Better quality duplexers result in less loss and chasing those last several watts makes very little difference. As someone else said in a similar thread recently, many repeater owners run their transmitter outputs at reduced output to ensure long life. 

That is how our club does it. We are using a Bridgecom repeater and running it at a lower power. We do the same with our 2m and 70cm repeaters. Running a busy repeater constantly at full power will shorten the life of the repeater. 

Another thing to look at is the duty cycle of the radios or repeaters. The higher the duty cycle is the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.