-
Posts
357 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
51
Reputation Activity
-
Hans reacted to AdmiralCochrane in FCC Improves On-line Interference Reporting
Shaking Elvis's hand would be icky considering how long he's been cold. Meeting him would be even worse, because that would mean I was with him. Not sure if Randy has been complimented or insulted.
-
Hans reacted to OffRoaderX in FCC Improves On-line Interference Reporting
My handshakes have often been described as both cold and icky.. and sometimes... moist..
-
Hans reacted to LariatAdvance in FCC Improves On-line Interference Reporting
Cold and icky handshakes are OK if they're on the square and level. ;)
-
Hans reacted to mlk32170 in FCC Improves On-line Interference Reporting
The problem in the Santa Clarita area is the Repeaters are creating the interference with automatic announcements. Announcements they are not supposed to be doing. Plus everyone in this area wants to fight and argue. I almost don't turn the radio on anymore. Even the ham club guys are involved in the arguments. I almost attended one club meeting. But, the silliness on air turned me off for even that.
PS, I have heard many of your videos. Good for you.
-
-
Hans reacted to OffRoaderX in FCC Improves On-line Interference Reporting
Sounds like they're working.
-
Hans reacted to WREM784 in Retevis RT97 Station ID
I just built an Android app for this: https://github.com/nathanchilton/remote-identifier
With the app running on an old Android phone, connected to a BTECH GMRS-V1 using a BTECH APRS-K1 cable, it listens for traffic. If it hears any sound (via the HT) after the last time it has identified, it will use speech-to-text to transmit an identification through the HT, which then is also transmitted via the repeater. It is a bit of a hack, but it means that the device just needs to be within range of the repeater for this to work (no direct interface to the repeater is needed). It isn't as good as a real controller, but I think it's better than nothing.
-
Hans reacted to back4more70 in Midland GMRS Product updates
You sure? Because:
🤣🤣🤣 I have been dying to use this image somewhere
-
Hans reacted to Blaise in FCC Report & Order - GMRS License Fee Lowered to $35
So apparently, it's really happening?
-
Hans reacted to gortex2 in FCC Report & Order - GMRS License Fee Lowered to $35
EFFECTIVE DATE OF NEW APPLICATION FEE RATES FOR THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU
MD Docket No. 20-270
On December 23, 2020, the Commission adopted a Report and Order implementing a new application fee schedule which significantly updated the Commission’s previous fee schedule. As indicated in the 2020 Application Fee Report and Order, the new application fee rates will become effective when the Commission’s “information technology systems and internal procedures have been updated, and the Commission publishes notice(s) in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of such rules.” On July 6, 2021, the Commission announced the new application fee rates for the Office of Engineering and Technology and the Media Bureau would become effective on July 15, 2021, and on December 15, 2021, the Commission announced the new application fee rates for the Wireline Competition Bureau, the Enforcement Bureau, the International Bureau, and CALEA Petitions would become effective on December 15, 2021. This Public Notice announces that the new application fee rates for the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, codified at 47 CFR § 1.1102, will become effective on April 19, 2022. Wireless application fees can be paid through the Commission’s Universal Licensing System (ULS) at Universal Licensing System.
Full document can be downloaded here - https://www.fcc.gov/document/effective-date-wireless-application-fee-rates
-
Hans reacted to PACNWComms in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
If it were not for MURS (and analog AM aviation comms), I think my Realistic Pro-2006 and Pro-2032 scanners would never get used anymore. I am close enough to several cities that decided to protest and self destruct certain areas, coordinating via MURS, as it provided the longest range and unlicensed band for VHF comms. Then I also heard many of them move to GMRS frequencies as well. Dual band, and cheap radios mean that both MURS and GMRS get a lot of use. Makes for some interesting listening. My local Wal-Mart still uses MURS, as does Lowes and possibly Home Depot at a few of their stores in my area. I have seen a few RDM series Motorola radios on the hips at some larger home improvement stores, some look to be VHF while others are UHF.
-
-
Hans reacted to Lscott in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
Windows has a remote feature, Remote Desktop, where you can login remotely from another computer. At the point it's like sitting at the other computer's keyboard, screen and mouse. The remote computer uses Windows terminal services client.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/how-to-use-remote-desktop-5fe128d5-8fb1-7a23-3b8a-41e636865e8c
I do this all the time at work. I have a Linux VM running on another computer with RDP, Linux's remote desktop service like Windows, and access it remotely over the company's network with Windows terminal services client software.
-
Hans reacted to berkinet in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
And... there is another solution that probably deserves its own topic. Remote access to a radio through the use of USB port sharing over Internet. The software I am most familiar with is VirtualHere (not related to VirtualBox). This software would let someone connect a radio to their local machine (Linux, Windows or MacOS) and then share it over the net so someone remote, with the proper software/skills, could program the radio.
I have personally used this scheme to program some Motorola radios using the Motorola programming software. We also use this same scheme to access our MTR2000 repeater should we need to make changes. In the case of the repeater, we run VirtualHere on a Raspberry-Pi. Works great.
-
Hans reacted to ULTRA2 in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
Thats what i thought thanks for the confirmation
Sent from my SM-T530NU using Tapatalk
-
Hans reacted to WRAF213 in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
151.625 is under Part 90.35 as a business itinerant channel and isn't part of MURS.
-
Hans reacted to ULTRA2 in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
We have Costco, Wallmart, Target, Winco Foods here in Roseville and i do hear traffic on 154.570 and 154.600. I once in a while i hear traffic on 151.625 not sure who uses that frequency but i do hear conversations on there.
Sent from my SM-T530NU using Tapatalk
-
Hans reacted to ncjones28677 in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
WAL-MART uses 154.600 and 154.570 yes they can .Walmart going to MURS some stores still hold an fcc bussiness license
-
Hans reacted to mcallahan in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
Yes, that is a typical (and legal) use of MURS radio.
-
Hans reacted to PastorGary in Are MURS radio allwowed for business use?
95.2731 Permissible MURS uses.
The operator of a MURS station may use it for the purposes listed in this section.
(a ) MURS stations may be used to transmit voice, data or image signals.
(b ) MURS stations may be used for telecommand and telemetry functions.
95.2733 Prohibited MURS uses.MURS stations must not be operated as repeater stations or signal boosters. This prohibition includes store-and-forward packet operation
==========================================================
2 Watt power limitations and no repeaters of any kind, but that's about it. Businesses use MURS all over the country.
-
Hans got a reaction from PACNWComms in Does Line A still exist?
Well, I happened to think that the ULS might show that information so I looked up a new, 10 year license. The restriction is there on the ULS. This is strange because it is not mentioned in part 95© or (E) and there appears to be no international agreement listed.
I'm stumped.
-
Hans got a reaction from Blaise in Petitioning to get a few VHF frequencies added to GMRS
Basics of English Common Law; that which is not prohibited, is permitted. Besides, from a regulatory standpoint, how does the FCC keep anyone from doing anything that it is illegal? The short answer is that it cannot. Any other system is unrealistic and tyrannical, but wholesale prior restraint systems are unethical and doomed to failure. Rather, it typically works like this; if Johnny commits a crime and if Johnny is caught and if Johnny's guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt, a proscribed penalty against Johnny is enacted. Where the FCC has an upper hand in this system is through licensing. By taking a license, either overtly or through license by rule, one operates under granted privilege. That makes the burden of the FCC lower than it would without a licensure scheme. Those operating under a license are assumed to have accepted being regulated. That's how all licenses work.
Regarding the question as to if a GMRS repeater in a parked vehicle is legal...
We can take a part 95 legal repeater for GMRS, place it in the car with mobile duplexer and mobile antenna, and drive it to a location. Then we can park and turn on the repeater. Is that prohibited? I don't see where it is but I am very open to the possibility that something in the language clearly makes it verboten.
-
Hans reacted to n4gix in Petitioning to get a few VHF frequencies added to GMRS
Absolutely! Changing from 462/467 MHz down to 447.975 MHz was a "bridge to far..." Having 16 channels is useless as the duplexer is simply too tight to allow, especially for multiple GMRS frequency pairs. Fortunately I have three analog service monitors in my shop. I wish I could afford a digital service monitor!
-
Hans reacted to n4gix in Maximum Wattage?
My fondest memories are of the really l o n g d i s t a n c e contacts I made using my 200 milliwatt handi-talkies to another young boy in California: from Ariington, Virginia to San Francisco, California! What a hoot that was back in 1958. Noise floor non-existent, skip propagation was King! ?
-
Hans got a reaction from n4gix in Maximum Wattage?
In the 1970s in our city it wasn't so kosher; especially at night. It sounded similar to today but less impolite between individuals. Still there were a lot of shenanigans, keying over others, illegal wattage, sexual content, etc.