Jump to content
  • 0

TXM Super Flex 1/2" Cable - FSJ4-50B


Flameout

Question

I'd like to eliminate my 2-25' sections of coax (One section is Andrew Heliax LDF4-50a and the other Andrew Heliax FSJ4-50b connected with good N connectors) and searching, I came across the TXM cable, which I have never heard of. The specs are about identical to the Andrew FSJ4-50b but a lot less money so I was wondering if anyone here has used or is currently using it on their repeater setup, and how it's working out.

https://www.txmstore.com/1-2-super-flexible-50-ohm-coax-cable-per-foot-compare-to-commscope-fsj4-50b-spf12/

It will feed my Commscope DB404 from my Motorola Radius GR500 repeater

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
31 minutes ago, WRYZ926 said:

One of the differences between coax quality is the amount of braided shielding. Higher quality coax will have more/thicker braids.

Here is what the braided shield looks like on quality LMR400 Ultraflex.

LMR400UF.jpg.c6d671396a091d1983920b49c215fd08.jpg

Another difference in the construction of coax shielding is the material used in each layer of shielding.  Some companies use copper braid over aluminum foil.  Others use copper braid over copper foil.  

Both aluminum and copper are good conductors, with copper being better (silver is the best elemental conductor). Both oxidize.  Aluminum oxide is a poor conductor (aka good insulator). Copper oxide doesn’t affect conductivity much.

Some people who work with repeaters claim that using a cable that has copper over aluminum causes issues when used on repeaters because that aluminum oxide layer forms a semiconductor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
54 minutes ago, Flameout said:

Well, I just ordered 50', so since no one here has ever used it, I'll try to post my review of it after I get it installed

Installation is usually the most difficult part.  I would wring it out on an antenna analyzer or network analyzer first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I only use CommScope FSJ. Also just started using Eupen cable. The EC4-50-HF appears to be very similar. I have run some tests with CommScope connector on the EC4-50HF and so far it appears to sweep and work ok. Only issue with eupen is the lack of support from the large companies. Last check neither Tessco or talley carried anything for it. Thats why I stick to CommScope. 

https://eupen.us/products/coaxial-cables/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

After messing around with this coax, I'd recommend to avoid it. It's like the cheap Chinese copper is thinner than the good USA made FSJ4-50B coax. Attaching a connector, it just shredded the copper.I finally got my connectors on and tests are ok, but I'd still never buy it again

20240201_125853.thumb.jpg.3d21dabfbd93bb4c481348fd935db35c.jpg

20240201_125840.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Construction of the coax and materials used definitely makes a difference. Dissimilar metals can cause issues when they corrode/oxidize. I know not radio related, but I always cringe when people don't use any type of anti-seize on steel bolts into aluminum parts that are exposed to the environment such as on vehicles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

 

5 hours ago, WRYZ926 said:

One of the differences between coax quality is the amount of braided shielding. Higher quality coax will have more/thicker braids.

Here is what the braided shield looks like on quality LMR400 Ultraflex.

 

 

 

I do have some good LMR400 going to my GAP Titan DX HF antenna. I was 'hoping' that this TXM cable would be similar to the Andrew Heliax FSJ4-50b hardline to use on my repeater. I do have some abs industries 25400f on a repeater and it works great. The TXM sure is nothing like this good Andrew Heliax FSJ4

FSJ4-50B [FSJ4_50B_jpg].jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
9 minutes ago, hfd376 said:

The type of feedline Flameout is referring to does not have a braided outer conductor. How did you prep that cable? Was it done with an all in one prep tool, used with a drill or T handle? If so, was it for that brand and model cable?

I used the Commscope MCPT-1412. It did a good job prepping the cable, it's just when I threaded on the N connector, it tore up that cheap copper. I always use good fittings too. Was using an Andrew F4PNMV2-HC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
34 minutes ago, hfd376 said:

I have no experience at all with the TMX cable, and this is just a guess on my part. Perhaps the tolerances for the TMX are different than the Commscope. Maybe the piece that goes between the outer conductor and the dielectric in the backnut was too large or small. Again, just a guess.

Before purchasing, I emailed them and asked if my Commscope/Andrew fittings that work on my Commscope fsj4-50b cable would work on theirs, and they assured me their cables were the the same specifications. On this TXM cable, you just have to be damn sure to to thread the fitting too tightly. I got things working and everything tests OK, but I'll stick with good USA made cable from now on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.