WSCU736 Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 This might be a dumb question. But can a ham UHF radio be used for GMRS only? WSEZ 1 Quote
nokones Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 4 minutes ago, WSCU736 said: This might be a dumb question. But can a ham UHF radio be used for GMRS only? Radio devices transmitting on GMRS freqs must be in accordance with Part 95, Subparts A & E. More than likely, not legally. gortex2, Lscott, RayDiddio and 1 other 4 Quote
SteveShannon Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 6 minutes ago, WSCU736 said: This might be a dumb question. But can a ham UHF radio be used for GMRS only? Not according to the regulations, but from a technical standpoint yes, and many people do. Adam426, WSEZ, Lscott and 3 others 5 1 Quote
WSCU736 Posted November 4 Author Report Posted November 4 1 minute ago, SteveShannon said: Not according to the regulations, but from a technical standpoint yes, and many people do. Well thank you. I was wondering if one stays below 50 watts. How could anyone tell what radio it is. WSEZ 1 Quote
SteveShannon Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 6 minutes ago, WSCU736 said: Well thank you. I was wondering if one stays below 50 watts. How could anyone tell what radio it is. People usually announce it on public forums. wayoverthere, WSEZ, Willie and 8 others 2 1 8 Quote
WSCU736 Posted November 4 Author Report Posted November 4 1 minute ago, SteveShannon said: People usually announce it on public forums. That doesnt sound to smart to me. WSEZ and LeoG 2 Quote
Socalgmrs Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 “They” can’t tell the difference at all. It’s a matter of you wanting to stay “legal” or in accordance with the rules or not. Many many people all over the country use ham radios for gmrs. Many many do not and only use gmrs certified radios. Adam426, WSEZ, RayDiddio and 1 other 2 2 Quote
amaff Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 A lot of folks use Ham radios. A lot use commercial / LMR UHF radios. 5 minutes ago, SteveShannon said: People usually announce it on public forums. I often joke that "How do you know if someone's using a Motorola? Don't worry, they'll tell you." WSCU736, SteveShannon, WSEZ and 8 others 1 10 Quote
WRYZ926 Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 No one will ever know the difference unless you tell them. As stated, amateur radios are not type 95 certified so are not legal to use on GMRS. Some people want to stay compliant while others don't worry about it. That is a decision you have to make for yourself. I can't confirm or deny that any of my radios have been modded WSEZ, WRUU653, WSCU736 and 2 others 1 1 3 Quote
WSCU736 Posted November 4 Author Report Posted November 4 Thanks all. That answered my question. wink wink Adam426 and WSEZ 2 Quote
amaff Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 2 minutes ago, WRYZ926 said: I can't confirm or deny that any of my radios have been modded All of mine that can be unlocked are (well, they're ham / GMRS radios that are unlocked) because most of the cheap radios' software is really restrictive. They're unlocked so I can configure them how I want. Following all the GMRS rules (my mobile won't transmit on 8-14, for example, and runs 5W on 1-7, etc), but I can put the channels I want where I want in the radio's memory. WRYZ926 and WSCU736 1 1 Quote
WRYZ926 Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 Just now, amaff said: All of mine that can be unlocked are (well, they're ham / GMRS radios that are unlocked) because most of the cheap radios' software is really restrictive. They're unlocked so I can configure them how I want. Following all the GMRS rules (my mobile won't transmit on 8-14, for example, and runs 5W on 1-7, etc), but I can put the channels I want where I want in the radio's memory. And some 20 watt mobile radios can transmit on channels 8-14 when set to narrow band and low power without any mods being done. They still transmit above the legal 0.5 watts though. A suggestion for those thinking about modding an amateur radio for GMRS, I highly suggest that you make sure that it will not transmit on GMRS channels 8-14 so you don't possibly interfere with the GMRS repeater channels. amaff, WRUU653, WSCU736 and 2 others 2 3 Quote
SteveShannon Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 17 minutes ago, WSCU736 said: That doesnt sound to smart to me. Unless you do something incredibly stupid with your radio, nobody will know and almost nobody will care, not even the FCC. WRUU653, WRUQ357, WSCU736 and 3 others 4 1 1 Quote
dosw Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 1 hour ago, WSCU736 said: Well thank you. I was wondering if one stays below 50 watts. How could anyone tell what radio it is. 50w for 15-22 and repeater inputs. 5w for 1-7, 0.5w for 8-14, plus 8-14 have to be narrowband and should only be handheld. Bandwidth misconfigurations show up in the waterfall of SA or SDR equipment. But more importantly, can cause interference with the repeater inputs. Nobody can tell, if you're configured correctly. SteveShannon, WRUU653, TrikeRadio and 2 others 3 2 Quote
amaff Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 10 minutes ago, SteveShannon said: Unless you do something incredibly stupid with your radio, nobody will know and almost nobody will care, not even the FCC. Pretty much this. You've got to try pretty hard to actually get into real trouble with the FCC. And even then... WRUQ357, WSEZ and WSCU736 1 1 1 Quote
Lscott Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 2 hours ago, SteveShannon said: People usually announce it on public forums. At least the dumb ones do. SteveShannon, WSEZ, Elmo777 and 1 other 1 3 Quote
UncleYoda Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 Has there ever been a case of being fined, warned or whatever FCC does for using a ham radio for GMRS where POWER and BANDWIDTH were correct? dosw, SteveShannon and amaff 3 Quote
WRXB215 Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 47 minutes ago, UncleYoda said: Has there ever been a case of being fined, warned or whatever FCC does for using a ham radio for GMRS where POWER and BANDWIDTH were correct? There was one guy that received a letter from the FCC that listed four violations. The last one was for using a non-type certified radio. That is not the reason he was investigated. They showed up because he was jamming a repeater. While they were there, they noticed he did it with a non-type certified radio and just threw that in for good measure. To my knowledge, that is the only time it has ever shown up on a letter and, like I said, that was not why they showed up at his house. RayDiddio, amaff, WSEZ and 4 others 5 2 Quote
TrikeRadio Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 2 hours ago, WRXB215 said: There was one guy that received a letter from the FCC that listed four violations. The last one was for using a non-type certified radio. That is not the reason he was investigated. They showed up because he was jamming a repeater. While they were there, they noticed he did it with a non-type certified radio and just threw that in for good measure. That's like getting a ticket for not wearing your seat belt .... but only because you were speeding and running red lights. WRUU653, AdmiralCochrane and RayDiddio 3 Quote
WRYS709 Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 There is one specific radio, the Radioddity DB20-G a/k/a Anytone AT-779UV that comes Part 95E certified that can easily “open” to use on Ham 2 meters/440 MHz and then reset to certified use on GMRS. AdmiralCochrane 1 Quote
UncleYoda Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 1 hour ago, WRYS709 said: There is one specific radio, the Radioddity DB20-G Yea I have one. I've left it in GMRS mode so far. Having to redo the channels each time is why I'm not eager to switch back and forth. The other thing they could've designed better is allowing more channels to be programmed for TX. Raybestos 1 Quote
marcspaz Posted November 4 Report Posted November 4 2 hours ago, TrikeRadio said: That's like getting a ticket for not wearing your seat belt .... but only because you were speeding and running red lights. You are correct and it does happen. In some circles, its referred to as a "sentence enhancer". TrikeRadio 1 Quote
nokones Posted November 5 Report Posted November 5 9 hours ago, WSCU736 said: Well thank you. I was wondering if one stays below 50 watts. How could anyone tell what radio it is. The FCC will find out when one of your friends end up dropping a dime on you. Keep your checkbook handy. amaff 1 Quote
WRYS709 Posted November 5 Report Posted November 5 45 minutes ago, UncleYoda said: Yea I have one. I've left it in GMRS mode so far. Having to redo the channels each time is why I'm not eager to switch back and forth. The other thing they could've designed better is allowing more channels to be programmed for TX. l create code plugs for each Mode. When opened, all 500 channels are available for TX. I posted somewhere here on this Forum in a GMRS thread, my codeplug for Part 95E rules when opened. amaff 1 Quote
Socalgmrs Posted November 5 Report Posted November 5 11 minutes ago, nokones said: The FCC will find out when one of your friends end up dropping a dime on you. Keep your checkbook handy. Aaaand they still won’t care. The fcc just doesn’t care. It can’t care. There is a repeater out in the world that interrupts every single other user on all .700 stations both 462 and 467. And all tones both analog and digital. This person transmits all kinds of stuff tel telemundo to radio stations to old westerns to some very nasty content. This repeater (person) has over 300 individual complaints to the fcc. The people affected by this repeater/person have 100s of hours of recordings, many many people have independently fox hunted this person down and used a kraken. The affected people have contacted local state and federal law enforcement, fcc, and congressman. Guess what. The fcc still has done nothing for over 12 months. I highly doubt they will go after some one using a uv5r and not a uv5g. WSEZ, amaff, WRUQ357 and 1 other 2 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.