Jump to content

jwilkers

Members
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from AdmiralCochrane in FRS Mobile?   
    FRS radios must have a permanently attached antenna and have a 2 watt maximum output power.

    Anything else is illegal.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  2. Sad
    jwilkers got a reaction from koni13 in FRS Mobile?   
    FRS radios must have a permanently attached antenna and have a 2 watt maximum output power.

    Anything else is illegal.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  3. Sad
    jwilkers got a reaction from WRXP381 in FRS Mobile?   
    FRS radios must have a permanently attached antenna and have a 2 watt maximum output power.

    Anything else is illegal.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  4. Sad
    jwilkers got a reaction from WRXP381 in Btech GMRS Pro illegal?   
    The FCC doesn't assign the FCC ID and certify the radio. The testing labs do. The test report goes on file with the FCC.

    The FCC has later gone and pulled certification on some radios that were later found to be illegal.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk

  5. Like
    jwilkers reacted to OffRoaderX in GM-15Pro Stock Antenna Hi SWR?   
    It is nearly impossible to get an accurate SWR reading on a HT antenna without specialized equipment... But even if your reading of 2 was accurate, an SWR of 2 is perfectly fine.
    Stop overthinking everything and just use your radio. 
  6. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from RayP in GMRS travel channel   
    Well, where I'm going with this is that the travel and calling frequency has already been established.  Why is it necessary to come up with another one.  Just support the existing standard.
  7. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from WSCH851 in APRS software for GMRS   
    If you want APRS, get an amateur license and quit trying to make GMRS into something it wasn't meant to be.

    All you people wanting to turn GMRS into a clone of amateur radio need to just get their licenses.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  8. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from AdmiralCochrane in APRS software for GMRS   
    If you want APRS, get an amateur license and quit trying to make GMRS into something it wasn't meant to be.

    All you people wanting to turn GMRS into a clone of amateur radio need to just get their licenses.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  9. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from gortex2 in APRS software for GMRS   
    If you want APRS, get an amateur license and quit trying to make GMRS into something it wasn't meant to be.

    All you people wanting to turn GMRS into a clone of amateur radio need to just get their licenses.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  10. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from Hoppyjr in APRS software for GMRS   
    If you want APRS, get an amateur license and quit trying to make GMRS into something it wasn't meant to be.

    All you people wanting to turn GMRS into a clone of amateur radio need to just get their licenses.

    Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk


  11. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from WRUU653 in Is the btech gmrs v2 a decent upgrade?   
    Probably nothing.

    But today's wod today kids is integrity. Following the rules anyway.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk

  12. Thanks
    jwilkers got a reaction from Sshannon in Is the btech gmrs v2 a decent upgrade?   
    Probably nothing.

    But today's wod today kids is integrity. Following the rules anyway.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk

  13. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from WRXB215 in Is the btech gmrs v2 a decent upgrade?   
    Probably nothing.

    But today's wod today kids is integrity. Following the rules anyway.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk

  14. Haha
    jwilkers got a reaction from Lscott in End of Transmission noise   
    MDC "whacker tone"

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


  15. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from Sshannon in Is the btech gmrs v2 a decent upgrade?   
    The BTECH GMRS-V2 isn't bad. I love the fact you can program any GMRS frequency into any channel position and delete those you don't want to.use. Their flexibility is a strong selling point.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


  16. Like
    jwilkers reacted to WRXP381 in For anyone interested in the FCC rules about linked GMRS repeaters, a response from the FCC.   
    pretty sure its very clear.   It says what it says  there is no other interpretation.   I don't understand why people cant read and understand plain language.   Its clear as can be and does not need any other clarification.   The reason this is, and will still be debated is because people don't want to accept it and are always looking for a work around  
  17. Like
    jwilkers reacted to OffRoaderX in Is the btech gmrs v2 a decent upgrade?   
    Although overload is a real thing, after testing LITERALLY every GMRS handheld manufactured in the last 5 years, I have never, EVER, NOT ONCE seen any overload/desense issues unless the radios were closer than about 75 feet, an 90% of the time they had to be closer than 25 feet or so.
    To claim that overload is an issue at up to a 1/2-mile, on its surface, seems like a preposterous over-exagguration, based on my very extensive testing. But that's just my experience.. 
  18. Like
    jwilkers reacted to gortex2 in S.H.T.F GMRS V HAM   
    GMRS wasn't intended for what you are looking for. If I heard a call I'd change channel or not answer. 
  19. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from WSAE510 in GMRS 10-Codes   
    Long standing tradition. You will find amateur protocol follows traditional operating procedures. Some repeater owners forbid cb lingo on their systems.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk

  20. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from Summit1 in Are linked repeater systems about to be shut down?   
    I hope they all go away.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


  21. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from RayP in New Repeater Channels for GMRS in 2024   
    I agree 100%! You get every Tom, dick, and Harry wanting to set up a repeater just because they want one. Don't ask for a new mode of communication to compensate for irresponsible use of spectrum.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk

  22. Thanks
    jwilkers got a reaction from RayP in Are linked repeater systems about to be shut down?   
    I hope they all go away.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


  23. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from RayP in What do you guys think of linked repeater systems?   
    I've always opposed them.

    GMRS is designed for families and small groups to communicate locally.

    Of course, now that the FCC has finally, definitely, ruled linked repeaters illegal, we can now see a return to sanity.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


  24. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from WRUU653 in What do you guys think of linked repeater systems?   
    I've always opposed them.

    GMRS is designed for families and small groups to communicate locally.

    Of course, now that the FCC has finally, definitely, ruled linked repeaters illegal, we can now see a return to sanity.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


  25. Like
    jwilkers got a reaction from gortex2 in Are linked repeater systems about to be shut down?   
    I hope they all go away.

    Sent from my SM-A136U using Tapatalk


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.