Jump to content

OffRoaderX

Members
  • Posts

    1492
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    190

Posts posted by OffRoaderX

  1. Its been a while since I've had either of my 50X1s,  but IIRC t's pretty simple..

    First - read the manual and familiarize yourself with how the menu system works - failure to do this part will result in much confuckulation and rage. Optionally you could watch some youtube videos about how to use the menu system for the 50X1 or a UV-5R, since the menus are virtually the same.

    Then, select the channel that you want to put the PL code on, go to the menu option for CTCSS tones, select the code from the list, save it, and enjoy.

    Another option would be use use your computer and the CHIRP software which in many ways is easier since it's almost self-explanatory on the screen after learning how to use CHIRP.

     

  2. I havnt used the newer Talkabouts, but I have used companding on several Motorola and non-motorola radios, and I have tested and used the noise-cancellation on the GM-N1 radios.

    Companding is nowhere near the "noise cancellation" that is in the GM-N1 - not even close.  The GM-N1 does a surprisingly good job and actually cancelling/removing LOUD extraneous noise, while companding just removes a little hiss in the signal.

    I would recommend turning off companding altogether because (in my experience and testing) it's not worth the hassle - however I dont know what a QSO is.

  3. Ohh, I did not know that the Retevis RT97S is Part 95 Certified!  I have the (older) RT97 (non-S version) and have had great results with just a mag-mount antenna on the top of my car.  You can see how that went in this video: 

    and you can see how well it works in hilly areas in this video:

     

    I agree with @WROZ250's warning about the Bridgecom - I have not used one, but have read many bad/negative reviews on them (although did not know they had a Part 95 repeater).

    I have also built a repeater from two KG-1000Gs - and although it was a great learning experience, its very expensive and not a practical solution for a 'real' repeater.
     

  4. 3 hours ago, WRTE516 said:

    I have been waiting for about a week to get approval and have gotten nothing back.

     

    make sure your GMRS callsign is listed in your profile along with your name and leave your device signed in to the channel.

  5. 1 hour ago, WROZ250 said:

    In any event, if there is one thing in this forum that gets to me from time to time, it is this constant ideology by a few that 'Hams' are somehow 'bad people', idiots, 'snobs', whatever (take your pick).  I would also point out that there is a large percentage of GMRS users on this forum who are also 'hams'.
     

    This is ideology is a result of the constant barrage of ham radio operators acting like snobs, idiots, and whatever (take your pick) in online forums every day seemingly doing their best to chase away newcomers to the hobby.  And yes, GMRS users also do this, but strangely, many of them also have ham callsigns listed on their forum signatures.

  6. 1 hour ago, bobfear said:

    I'm having an issue with my QYT KT8900D not broadcasting to repeaters...I can not figure out why my QYT won't broadcast to the repeater. ..

     

    The KT8900D is a ham radio so by definition (and per the user-manual) it cannot transmit on GMRS (462/467Mhz)

  7. 24 minutes ago, WRTB501 said:

    ...does it matter the size of the ground plane or ideal size anyways? 

    "Some people" will answer with calculations and laws of physics and big words in an attempt impress us - ignore them.

    Any cookie sheet big enough to have at least a few inches all around the base is fine.

  8. I use one at my house with my KG-935G and various other HTs.  Its a fine little antenna and it has many farz.. Just remember that it needs a ground-plane so slap it on a cookie-pan or something.

    Whatever antenna you use, if you're using more than just a couple of feet of antenna-cable, be sure to get GOOD quality/LOW loss cable..

  9. That 42.5 inch Abbree is not a GMRS antenna and would likely perform worse than your stock antenna.

    If you really need more farz, and assuming you are in/have a vehicle, look at a mobile 20 or 50W unit and put an external mobile antenna on it.. 

  10. IIRC - and I could be wrong because I donated mine a while back and I'm going by memory.. The noise cancelling is very similar to (if not the exact same) as the "compander" function on other radios.  In order for it to do any good, it has to be enabled on both radios - and then it reduces a little background static.. BUT, if you have it enabled, you may sound 'weird' to people that dont have that feature on their radio, and they will all sound weird to you.

    Of course the user-manual is completely useless..

  11. I highly doubt the code (which is NOT private, BTW) has anything to do with it..

    My first guess is that something in the Jeep is causing the noise - the only way to know for sure is to take the radio out of the jeep and try it in another vehicle or in the house (if you have a power supply) - if the same thing happens, then send it back.

    When you have your handheld radios in the jeep, do they get any of the static bursts?

  12. 42 minutes ago, WRTB501 said:

    so far im debating on the Wouxun 905g and the UV-9g, now after playing with my BF-F8HP i have a understanding of how it works atleast, is either one of those better than the other by chance? 

    That depends on how you define "better"..

    The 905G is a superheterodyne radio and the UV-9G is an SOC, so the 905G is better.

    The UV-9G costs around $45 and the 905G is over $100, so the UV-9G is better

    The 905G has a larger battery that will last longer than the UV-9G, so the 905G is better.

    The UV-9G has a smaller battery and is lighter than the 905G so the UV-9G is better.

    The UV-9G is waterproof, the 905G isnt, so the UV-9G is better.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.