-
Posts
184 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Reputation Activity
-
mainehazmt reacted to 6040 in zello app linking
After some unsuccsessfull attempts on an RF link, I have been giving some thought on this as well. There are a few repeaters in my area using Zello.
i think its a great idea if you can link local repeaters together to gain more coverage. Myself, I'm not into the phone app stuff, I'm into radio's, if i have to use my smart phone to make a contact, why dont i just call you on the cell.....just my thought
-
mainehazmt got a reaction from Logan5 in Part 95 Repeaters
That would take away the fun of my Santa sleigh up in the air at Christmas time... Code? Wow I'm glad I don't live in an area that picky. Never had one at my house lol! Just 5 bucks for a permit to build And none needed for an antenna tower!
-
mainehazmt reacted to WQYC236 in The Don't Know, Don't Care Group (DKDCG)
Ha! If I have another conversation with him I may tell him he made the big time on MYGMRS!
-
mainehazmt reacted to zap in Idea for building Part 95 compliant repeater
The problem with the Maxtrac, the PA actually backs down in power based on a timer in the logic board. The GM300 on the other hand used a thermistor to control power.
-
mainehazmt reacted to WQYC236 in The Don't Know, Don't Care Group (DKDCG)
Speaking of the unlicensed, I'd like to expand that term to the "Don't Know, Don't Care Group" (DKDCG)! I spoke to one of these on Saturday while I was in a small town of about 30,000 people near me.
I had the radio on scan when I heard that annoying warbling sound produced by somebody hitting the "Call Button" on a walkie talkie. If that wasn't annoying enough, the scanner was following him up through the channels, one, two, three, four, etc. After listening to him move through all the channels twice, I thought maybe someone was actually in trouble and trying to find help on any possible channel. I identified myself and asked if someone needed assistance. The response was "No, I'm just trying to see if this radio works".
To make a long story short we talked for maybe 3 or 4 minutes while I explained to him (obviously an adult male) about licensing and the power and channel restrictions. I encouraged him to stay on the FRS only channels if he wasn't going to get a license and to especially avoid the Repeater channels, explaining that he could be interfering with legitimate communications. He responded with short, unintelligent answers. I finally signed off and went back to scanning mode, only to hear him back on the repeater channels warbling through every frequency, just as if nothing happened!
The famous turn of the century evangelist Billy Sunday once said, "Anybody can get born again, but stupid is forever"!
-
mainehazmt reacted to SteveC7010 in What are the rules for setting up a GMRS repeater
The license question has already been answered for you several times. No need to keep posting the same question in different threads.
For the rules: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2009-title47-vol5/pdf/CFR-2009-title47-vol5-part95.pdf
Read back through some of the threads here. Part 95 has been extensively discussed on this forum. and those threads should answer most any question you might have about iterpreting the rules.
-
mainehazmt reacted to coryb27 in NEW GMRS RADIO!!!
I checked and it is able to be programed to use DPL 263. in your DCS table select number 47 on your TX channel.
I found this in appendix C of the manual along wiht instructions on how to program it.
https://baofengtech.com/gmrs-v1
I think you are talking about my repeater in IL, if so feel free to jump on. No permission required I have it listed public and encourage its use.
I wrote this up a while back https://forums.mygmrs.com/topic/592-rebuilding-the-chain-o-lakes-repeater-ingleside-il/
Corey
-
mainehazmt reacted to rdunajewski in how can a GMRS repeater be built or bought with part 95 compliance?
I and others on here are of the opinion that any Part 90 gear that meets the technical requirements in Part 95 (which virtually all do today) is okay to use on GMRS when operated within the appropriate limits. I know you mentioned Part 95 specifically, and there is still a legal gray area on what I just said above. The issue is that there isn't a lot of equipment available that is certified for GMRS to the extent that the Part 95 rules are a major hinderance to the service.
Following the letter of the law, then you should only use Part 95 equipment. However the rules exist to set minimum technical requirements and modern Part 90 radios are compliant and worthy substitutes (in many cases also exceed the specifications of Part 95).
From an enforcement standpoint, it's really a non-issue. I've seen no reports of the FCC taking issue with a Part 90 radio, being operated correctly (i.e. within proper power limits), on GMRS. There is no way to tell aside from a station inspection that the radio is not Part 95 compliant.
I'll stress once again that this is opinion, but it is a prevailing opinion in the community it seems.
-
mainehazmt reacted to dgnielson in UV-82C VFO Problem
It is the same procedure. Make sure you hold the MENU button down until the radio beeps, about 2-3 seconds after the radio turns on.
-
mainehazmt reacted to PastorGary in Using Repeaters for GMRS Calls - Greenville, SC
Accuracy of the data in the main repeater website is the responsibility of each system owner to maintain. If anyone sees a listing that is out of date or otherwise inaccurate, please use the REPORT feature for that listing to mention your observations to Rich D. Only Rich can deal with those listings.
Thank you.
-
mainehazmt reacted to PastorGary in CDM750 Lowband 29-36 60W 4Ch
I was licensed for operations on two of the Part 90 frequencies using AM - just above 'CB' and just below 31 MHZ for many years. It was OK, but during the peak of the 11 year sunspot cycle, the frequencies were a bit noisy with other stations from all over the US "skipping" to my location. That is the primary reason that most Public Safety agencies that were on low band in the 50's, 60's and early 70's, went to VHF. I still have the commercial EF Johnson Messenger radios and even though they are tube type, they are still type certified and still operate as designed (into a dummy load for testing only).
These days, with very few stations using low band - it might be a good place to go for Part 90 licensing if you want to be under the radar for some reason. My equipment was AM and worked better than some, because the AM system did not demodulate skip FM signals very well, so the interference to my system was minimal. Mobiles with a 5/8 wave base loaded antenna would net roughly 20 to 30 miles mobile to mobile and 40 + miles mobile to a simplex base. Never needed a repeater with that type of local coverage.
-
mainehazmt reacted to rfmedic in New guy in NYC
Myself and JohnE are the two big techies for the NYC area with wide coverage repeaters if you have any questions... Welcome to GMRS!
-
-
mainehazmt got a reaction from jwilkers in Ham Frequencies set to transmit but no license
the test bank questions and answers are on line most people one day of reading them then next day taking the practice tests will have you passing. You can pass it I did so anyone can! -
mainehazmt got a reaction from Logan5 in Ham Frequencies set to transmit but no license
the test bank questions and answers are on line most people one day of reading them then next day taking the practice tests will have you passing. You can pass it I did so anyone can! -
mainehazmt got a reaction from chiefeis in Ham Frequencies set to transmit but no license
the test bank questions and answers are on line most people one day of reading them then next day taking the practice tests will have you passing. You can pass it I did so anyone can! -
mainehazmt reacted to Ezekiel in Repeaters
Logan 5
I am very familiar with solar systems and battery back ups, I have built control boxes both solar and AC for Cellular networks. However I have never build the radio portion.
I will be building sometime soon we will see how it works.
thank you for the help.
-
mainehazmt reacted in New guy in NYC
Welcome,
Myself and Pastor Gary are the moderators of the group,let us know if there is anything you need or have questions.Feel free to jump in and get your feet wet.You never know what you will learn.We have a good bunch of guys that will answer most questions you may have and several have the technical expertise to assist with technical aspect.
We strive to keep this a family oriented group and do not tolerate any cursing nor vulgarity.We do not condone any flaming,harrasment or bullying,if you should have a problem let one of us know.Have a great weekend and welcome to the group ...William
-
mainehazmt reacted to n4gix in Ham Frequencies set to transmit but no license
Um, <raises hand shyly) I have to admit that I have on occasion mistakenly given out my GMRS call on 2m/70cm repeaters and vice-versa, but have always caught myself and made an immediate correction.
When you have so many mics to choose from it's entirely possible to pick up the wrong one.
-
mainehazmt reacted to chiefeis in Technician license
Checked earlier and they've already granted it. I printed it out and saved it locally. Updated my profile with the new callsign
-
mainehazmt reacted to GIjose82 in New guy in NYC
I Signed up for the forum back in January when I got my license but just got back to NYC and decided to finally post. I have gotten a lot of great info from here and hope to be able to contribute with some of my own knowledge in the future.
-
mainehazmt reacted to n4gix in Base Station Antenna Locations
To be perfectly frank, reception at your base/repeater is much more dependent on height than any other factor. While "power" might allow you to talk up to 13 miles, if you can only hear at most 3 miles what's the point?
Keep in mind that both mobile and HT radios will have on average 5' antenna height, so their LOS to your base/repeater is the true limiting factor to success. There are several web based propagation map generators that may be used to obtain a visual prediction of your system's performance.
I've found it very useful to work "backwards" and generate splatter maps as though the mobile/HT was the primary, and the actual base/repeater was the secondary. In other words, try to answer the question of "how high must my base/repeater antenna be to communicate with mobile/HT units..."
-
mainehazmt reacted to chiefeis in Technician license
Well I took the Technician test on Saturday and passed. So something this week I expect to receive my license and callsign. They talked me in to sitting for the General test (there was no fee for testing at this location). Missed a few too many on that one. LOL. I'll most likely take it next month since I was pretty close to passing it.
-
mainehazmt reacted to Logan5 in Ritron Patriot RRX-450
Thanks for that link, JohnE, That will come in handy. I just got in from Local "Ham Shack" with the re-tuned duplexer, he said it was way off. in other words, the E-bay seller changed the freq. on the radios, but not the duplexer. well all it really cost me was time. I couldn't even give the old HAM Beer money. anyway, i am about to hook it up. wish me luck. lol
-
mainehazmt reacted to Logan5 in Ritron Patriot RRX-450
Good to hear, Bill. I managed to find a local HAM to tune my duplexer, dropped it off last Saturday. he does it free if for a good cause, I am meeting him at the local Radio shop tomorrow to pick it up. he determined our GMRS repeater was a good cause. I am going to keep it "Permission only" to minimize abuse. However anyone that uses this site is welcome to ask permission on the air, if your in ever in the area, as i am usually listening to both repeaters.
Also, for Pastor Gary, I have had a request from a local user through myGMRS.com and I have replied to the request both times. I am not sure this person is getting my permission granted reply's to his request. this person is one of the few users that does not post his call sign in his profile. I looked so I could contact him directly, looks like only 5 or 6 users have no call sign posted.