Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, WRXB215 said:

My suggestion would be to not make up new ones. Just use the ones that already exist. The whole point is to have clear communications. That is why the phonetic alphabet came into existence in the first place.

Except that most of them have changed since the late 1950s to what we have now... because people made up new ones. 

Posted

Frankly, unless someone requests your call sign phonetically because they cannot understand it when you ID, I wouldn’t use phonetics.  Use your names and ID with your call sign.

And, if someone does ask for it phonetically, you’re more assured of them hearing it correctly if you use the NATO phonetics.  They were chosen to reduce the chance of misunderstanding by people with accents, and people who natively speak other languages.  That’s important to the military and to hams who might be communicating with hams internationally, but has less importance for GMRS, where coverage is limited to within the USA.

Posted
On 10/20/2023 at 7:17 PM, WRYZ926 said:

I'll stick with the phonetic alphabet that I learned in the military, which is the same as most amateur radio operators also use. It is not hard to learn. 

Amen.  I just haven't used it all that much since..... ummmm 30 years ago.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.