Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/29/24 in all areas
-
Your friend is wise. Remember though, while your immediate family is covered by your license, everyone in your party who isn't covered by your GMRS license needs their own license. But if you are using amateur radio to keep in contact with other people in your party, everyone needs their own amateur radio license. No free lunch for your immediate family. Not everyone wants to take a test. That's the beauty of GMRS. You don't have to know much. You just need $35 for a license, and maybe $30 for a radio.3 points
-
As long as you identify with callsign every 15 minutes, you're legal. "Hey Fred this is dad" is perfectly legal so long as you throw your callsign out there every 15 minutes. WRTS881/1 this is WRTS881/2 is too anal. Talk to your family like you normally would, just include a callsign every 15 minutes.3 points
-
Dirty Radios
WRXB215 and 2 others reacted to Radioguy7268 for a question
Yes - 3rd party testing, and when you drill down into the FCC Certs for Part 95 equipment, some of it has been 'certified' for strange ultra-narrow emissions and lower power than what people are actually going to use the radios for. If the certification is for a 7 kHz bandwidth and 1.25 watts of power, your shiny Part 95 'certification' kinda gets fuzzy once the end users program their new GMRS HT for 25 kHz and 4 watts.3 points -
1/4 wave whip is 6" and will work better than both of the antennas mentioned.....3 points
-
2 points
-
I tend to buy the items I think I need instead of what they think I need. Best to do what you're doing, asking questions and research. I see you're also looking at the IC-7300, which is a great radio too. I lean towards Icom for my station. Just stay away from package deals and get the radio you desire, a decent power supply to handle the load should you get your license. I don't know your physical situation when it comes to deploying an antenna, but a great choice would be an end-fed wire with an UN-UN. If you are unfortunate enough to be in an HOA, this is an easily concealable antenna. Calling HRO or DX Engineering and give them an idea of what you want is one of your best options. And they will gladly help you as they are knowledgeable and willing to help.2 points
-
Yes, I never had any issues with Comet. I will definitely be purchasing another this fall. Hopefully by then it will come from a different production run. Plus, I prefer tower climbing in the colder weather.2 points
-
WHAT? That would cost postage! We have 235,385,823,556,235,765 illegals and 28 foreign countries to support with "foreign aid". No way you're getting the US Government to waste postage on YOU, taxpayer. Joey Biden doesn't do ANYTHING for the taxpaying American. BOHICA2 points
-
Also if the antenna is not "resonate" at those frequencies it will contribute to reflected power back to the radio and an elevated SWR reading.2 points
-
Subaru Outback
SteveShannon and one other reacted to Hoppyjr for a question
I agree with those who think a NMO mount in the roof is the best plan, but I’d avoid the whip. On my 4Runner I did NMO in the roof with the Midland “Ghost” antenna. Low profile and works fantastic here in the PNW. I recently picked up the Pulse-Larsen LP450NMO, which also screws onto the same NMO mount, but has given equal or better performance to the Midland Ghost. The Larsen is shaped like a hockey puck, so it’s shorter than the Midland Ghost and larger diameter. The bottom has a nice foam weather seal. This would likely work well for you and keep low enough for your rooftop accessories when needed.2 points -
I have to disagree with using a mobile radio being dangerous when driving. I am unaware of a single study that supports the claim. There are plenty of studies that show drivers adjusting their AM/FM/Sat radios are in the top 3 causes of distracted driving, but nothing about 2-way radio. I would think it's no different then talking to a passenger. The next step from laws like this is no entertainment radio, no navigation, no talking to passengers. It's stupid and tyrannical. Just hold people accountable for distracted driving instead of naming and outlaw every possible distraction.2 points
-
The same people tend to like ridiculous gun laws that don’t actually reduce crime. Those people likely don’t own radios or guns, so they don’t care. They want government to make it all better. Safer. They also lack enough intelligence to understand they are willfully and incrementally giving up their freedom.2 points
-
Calling all AR-152 owners...
Delta4N6 and one other reacted to SteveShannon for a topic
Although GMRS is in the name of the site, the site also caters to ham radio interests. Radio is radio. If you’re so up-tight that the inclusion of helpful information about a radio triggers you, then you probably aren’t getting much enjoyment out of anything. Learn to ignore posts about non-GMRS radios.2 points -
Unable to connect to any GMRS nets in my area. Seems the only one is in Fort Pierce, FL. Is that the only one I can connect to? Very new to the GMRS hobby. I am licenced on GMRS and would like to participate in some of these weekly and monthly nets. Not much simplex here in Central Florida area - Winter Garden, FL, 34787 Thanks. Pio Romano WRMG4481 point
-
An interesting proposal for GMRS+
SteveShannon reacted to SOBX for a topic
1 point -
Shortwave Radio Recommendations
WSCH851 reacted to SteveShannon for a question
Both the FT-710 and the IC-7300 are SDR radios. The IC-7300 is a few years older than the FT-710, but it's very popular. It's pretty obvious that Yaesu had the popularity of the IC-7300 in mind when they brought out the FT-710. In fact, a lot of people referred to the FT-710 as the IC-7300 killer. Although I lean more towards the FT-710, I don't think you could go wrong with either.1 point -
Central Florida Nets
WSAE603 reacted to MarkInTampa for a topic
1 point -
Wouxan KG-1000g plus faceplate data cable
SteveShannon reacted to BoxCar for a question
No, I don't know what is carried on the cable. My best estimation is that the signals are a combination of analog (voice) from the microphone and either DTMF tones or digital codes from the keys. PTT is probably either voltage or ground to key the transmitter. Someone with an Oscope could breakout the wires and examine the signals. I don't have any test equipment more sophisticated than a VOM and SWR meter.1 point -
MFJ had too many "moving parts" they pulled under one umbrella. There is likely investor interest out there, but only for some of the subsidiaries, like Mirage, Ameritron etc. Now that the announcement is made that manufacturing will cease on 5/17, I believe, I wonder how the prices will look on new and used gear that will soon be out of production. With the Hamvention coming up in a few weeks that's going to be interesting to see.1 point
-
If your radio's manufacturer publishes detailed specifications to include sensitivity, selectivity and spurious response/emissions then you can view exactly how dirty/clean the transmitter is. Here is a hint, if they don't publish that information, you probably don't want that radio.1 point
-
I wanted to note we use Chirp for all our kg-1000g's. They have support for the original and pro version. Tony1 point
-
With line-of-sight radios (UHF and VHF frequencies), added power means you have better reception in the area covered rather than greater distance. The distance (farz) depends on how high the antenna is above the surrounding ground. An antenna 6 feet above ground level (AGL) can reach a repeater many miles away if the repeater is on ground higher than you. That' why so many repeaters are located on high hills, buildings, and mountains. Height more than power equals distance.1 point
-
Honestly, if the software transforms the radio into the radio you want it to be, I wouldn't worry about the power. I would program everything for medium power and not look back. I doubt you'll notice a difference in range.1 point
-
Dirty Radios
SteveShannon reacted to Lscott for a question
That says a lot about their quality control, or lack of it. Another reason why CCR’s have a poor reputation with people.1 point -
Agree with WRXP381 on the NMO mount, mag mount or edge mount, and a Midland MXTA26. Their GMRS antennas need no tuning, so it's about as easy as it gets. So if it's an option its a great place to start. OffRoaderX reports some fine performance with an MXTA26 mounted lower on his jeep in what many would say is a less than desirable manner, but works for him. If that's not workable, the antenna farm has 1/2 and 5/8 wave NMO antennas which cover the 450-470Mhz range, not sure if they need to be, or can be trimmed, for optimal performance. Like many things GMRS you may have to experiment a bit to see what works for your particular situation1 point
-
As '381 mentioned, a quarter wave ground plane is about 6" long, and so would fit and clear the garage, and while not a gain antenna, with a good ground under it, it will probably out-perform the ghost type antenna. If the carrier might hold items that can get in the way of the antenna, then a compromise might be a magnet mount antenna; not ideal, but still might be a better performer than a ghost antenna.1 point
-
85 Miles? How far away have you made contact?
SteveShannon reacted to nokones for a topic
1 point -
Pennsylvania people.. you need to take action now
IronWire reacted to SvenMarbles for a topic
People really need to wake up and start checking our governments. Let me ask this,.. Was there some sort of insane uptick in ham radio related driving accidents? I'm going to speculate that there wasn't... So why is it that the state of Pennsylvania feels compelled to just decide to impose a seemingly punitive law upon the people? I feel like we're just too many generations of people removed from the times when people conceptualized and understood the proper dynamic of government and the citizenry who ALLOW it. We're not just supposed to be a ruled people. We're not supposed to just live and accept the rules that mom and dad politicians make for us. These sorts of laws for "the good of public safety" should generally be a consensus (more people than not) agreement by the citizenry and the governing bodies that we both fund and give/entrust the authority to govern with. Any time some thing of this type comes about, ask yourself this question. "If this issue went to referendum, would The People sign off and agree to this?'. If you really feel like that's a no, then the government are acting as criminals and intervention is necessary.1 point -
That is mighty nice of you. I mean it's not like the cost to get a pair is super expensive. But most administrators off the bat would of not offered or put secondary user stipulations even the if pair wasn't used. You know "in case". Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk1 point
-
I totally agree. That way the system users can operate under the system license authority and don't have to worry about getting an individual license. I have several Part 90 Business Radio Service frequency pairs licensed statewide in California and if I need to I will give permission and/or give up a pair for his system.1 point
-
According to the mygmrs.com map, all the GMRS channels are not overly used in Sonoma County. I just took a quick look and the "725" channel pair appears to be a good candidate for a county wide GMRS channel. You will need to get a good simulcast system designer so you can start designing and identifying the transmitter sites. You just can't plunk down a simulcast transmitter on any site and have a good working system. It'll take careful planning. I know what it takes to plan a good working simulcast system in Sonoma County. I spent a lot of time and driven many miles in Sonoma County to get a simulcast system to work. To save time and effort you should try to acquire the space and services for the remote sites and mirror the Sheriff's UHF Simulcast system. Acquiring the remote site space and services is going to be your biggest problem if improvements are required. The County should be receptive in providing services for renting mux channels for a fee of course on their Microwave System. You will need to identify where you will be locating your system control equipment.1 point
-
Have you tried the Roadkill network?1 point
-
This is exactly why you need a P.O. Box or Ham Registry etc. I do believe (might be mistaken) the FCC web site specifically tells you that your address etc is public, it is your job on how you go about that privacy (I would think ).1 point
-
I would be pissed if you put me on that list! Why would you do that? Most people that use GMRS are not interested in being contacted by random strangers. They use it to stay in touch with friends and family and that's all they want it for. Then to add it to google and Farce book who harvest and sell everyone's data already. Many things are easily done, doesn't mean you should. Not cool in my opinion.1 point
-
Best Home Basestation Antenna for Either 50 Watt Midland or 50 Watt Wouxon?
SteveShannon reacted to WRXB215 for a question
I learned that lesson years ago buying sockets. After my second trip get a new socket, the light went on.1 point -
Best Home Basestation Antenna for Either 50 Watt Midland or 50 Watt Wouxon?
SteveShannon reacted to nokones for a question
Can't go wrong with the brands used by Public Safety agencies if you want reliability, longevity, performance, and cost-effectiveness over a long period of time. If you buy cheap, you get cheap. You don't see Public Safety agencies using some of the cheap antennae previously mentioned.1 point -
March 2024 Update from Bastrop, Tx. Alamo/New Braunfels is my closest repeater on the Alamo network. It is 70 miles away and pegs the meter on my KG-1000. Yesterday, I did a radio check and spoke to a 2 mobile units at both ends of 1604, east side and west side. They were as clear as day on my end and they heard me LC. What an awesome service to our Tx GMRS community. Many thanks to all involved.1 point
-
85 Miles? How far away have you made contact?
SteveShannon reacted to marcspaz for a topic
I wouldn't sweat it too much. Around my area, normal range (say mobile to mobile) is about 3 miles. On a good day, if both operators are on high spots, maybe 8 to 9 miles.1 point -
Central Florida Nets
WSCH851 reacted to MichaelLAX for a topic
Osceola 700 and Wedgefield 725 appear to be down according to the notes on their repeater pages here on myGMRS.om Be sure to check for the proper tone, for example 141.3 on Pasco 550 (I only set the tone for my transmissions and not for my reception, as I like to be sure to hear everything available, especially when I am traveling to use distant repeaters):1 point