coryb27 Posted March 18, 2019 Report Share Posted March 18, 2019 Why does every new license holder want to setup a repeater? I would like to shed a little light on some of the important things to consider if you recently got your GMRS license and now want your own repeater. First thing to consider, are there any open well placed repeaters in your area that you are able to use? I can assure you most repeater owners want people to use there repeater. Owning several repeaters I can assure you all are welcome and encouraged to use my machines. Do you have access to a location to host your repeater? If your answer is your garage roof you should reconsider. Your garage roof will give you about the same coverage as simplex. Unless you’re on top of a mountain and all your users are at the bottom you will never be happy with this setup. GMRS is not as popular as one would like to think, unless your repeater covers 20 miles or more you may find you only have 1 or 2 users in the area. Unless you already have a group of friends together you may want to consider this before spending money on a decent well positioned site to install your repeater. So you found a nice high site and the price is right, all you need to do is get the repeater installed, sounds simple right? Some thigs to consider first and foremost are the costs because they can add up quickly. Are you on a commercial tower that requires a license and bonded climber? If so this could be by far your largest expense depending on your area. I have spent $600 to $1200 on a climber; I have had quotes as high as $2500 depending on the amount of work and heights involved. Keep in mind commercial sites require certified mounts, hard line cable, cable clamps, engineered grounding solutions and commercial grade antennas. No tower owner is going to let you install a comet antenna and 200’ of braided shield coax. This brings me to my next point, the antenna. Because of the costs involved with climbers you will want to expend your budget on the antenna. Remember a $2000 repeater on a $200 antenna is going to work about as good as a $200 repeater. Whereas a $200 repeater on a $2000 antenna is going to work like a $2000 repeater. On my first repeater I was gifted use of a 150’ tower, I installed a DB-420 on the top and 160’ of 7/8 hardline. Total cost of equipment for the antenna install was $2500, with the climbers labor coming in at an additional $800. This left me with enough to purchase an old Motorola R100 repeater running at 25W. To my surprise it had 30 miles of coverage, all due to the cash spent on the antenna and waiting for a decent spot. Things happen, more so if you have an antenna 200’ in the air with a conductive cable connected to sensitive electronics. Antenna issues, feedline issues, repeater issues all cost money and I promise at some point you will have issues that need repair and require your money! It is my opinion that the GMRS community does not need another 2 to 5 miles repeater as it just becomes background noise. What use is a public listed repeater if somebody in a mobile can’t use it 5 miles away while moving or the portable coverage is only a mile? If after reading this you are still going to build a repeater for your garage more power to you, just don’t expect 20 people to show up if it only reaches a mile. As the owner of several GMRS and Commercial repeaters I can attest to the amount of money and effort go into my repeaters. I have only touched on the basics, if you add in any kind of testing services, duplexer tuning, addition of a combiner channel to an existing tower system, RF engineering, rent and insurance your costs can sky rocket. The best advice I can give any new licensee is to try and use the available systems in the area. Take the time to learn a little about what you’re doing and to assess the usability of the service before investing in a repeater for the sole reason of saying you own one. kipandlee, ARB4, WSCD723 and 42 others 38 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaine Posted March 18, 2019 Report Share Posted March 18, 2019 I am fortunate that a local amateur radio operator has a repeater available. It is done properly on a 400 ft tower. The repeater covers the entire county and portions of adjacent counties. My initial itch for my own repeater was because I live in a low lying area and needed help getting over a hump to reach my wife’s mobile when she is at work. Once I discovered the local amateur radio club, I joined and got access to the repeater. It eliminated all desire to set up my own repeater. Like you mention, GMRS is not wildly popular. For the most part it is only we two who use it, with the occasional visit from one of the hams. If the repeater owner ever decides to stop maintaining the repeater, I may very well become interested in building my own again. Fortunately, my coverage needs are modest, about 10 miles. We probably could blast through most of that distance on 40 Watt simplex, except for the hump right in the middle. coryb27, RodrigoAGJ, WRPQ760 and 7 others 7 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRCY896 Posted March 18, 2019 Report Share Posted March 18, 2019 I got into GMRS because I needed another layer of communication with my family. I also understood the limitations of FRS, and discovered the possibility of repeaters for GMRS. I stumbled into a working repeater, which will be programmed this week. There are no other repeaters that get into the country I typically venture into. I was just on a mountain top this morning, and am starting the process of the application for a solar site on that mountain with the BLM. I tested my V-1 radios to the house HT to HT and had clear communication at about 15 miles with a friend who lives 4 miles south of me. This repeater, will give an incredible amount of coverage to where I spend about 80% of my time in the hills. Add to that, cell phones and SPOT, and I am set quite well communication wise. WRKX608, coryb27 and kipandlee 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quarterwave Posted March 18, 2019 Report Share Posted March 18, 2019 Amen, Corey. coryb27, roberttosa and jimndfw 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 Ultimately, my goal with a garage repeater is essentially a chunky base station radio with a pocket-sized "terminal". But I live in a coverage gap between all the repeaters in the area. When conditions are good, I can occasionally hear one ID. 95% of the time, I hear nothing from them; 100% of the time, I can't open them up. I think there's a role for the garage repeater, but that role goes away if there's preexisting good coverage. WRFD931, WRWB993, WRVT652 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastorGary Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 Staff Memo - The subject of this thread is important enough, for newly licensed user reference, to pin it to the top of this posting area. WRUE951, JohnE, WQHV775 and 7 others 8 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gortex2 Posted March 25, 2019 Report Share Posted March 25, 2019 Corey is dead on. I spent many thousands of dollars on each repeater system i have online and have money sitting in new repeaters waiting for towers. It is not uncommon to spend upwards of $10,000 if buying all new gear. My last repeater that went online was a MTR3000 ($6500.00), Duplexer ($1800.00), 7/8" Hardline (175' @ 2.50'), DB408 - ($800.00), plus connectors, hangers, cable pulls, ground kits, ground wire. Yes we can all do this stuff for a lot less but it really depends on what you want out of the repeater. If you start your post with "Currently running on two Baofeng 5R with limited range" then its not a repeater that we should be putting in a database nor one that will benefit you or others. The goal is to have a repeater that is beneficial to the end user. Since I moved south I have 2 repeaters, antenna's and hard line. Neither are up yet as i want it to be worthwhile. One is waiting on a tower for my house and the other will be on a 400' tower if i can ever work out an agreement with the owners. WRVL973 and roberttosa 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 27, 2019 Report Share Posted March 27, 2019 Corey is dead on. I spent many thousands of dollars on each repeater system i have online and have money sitting in new repeaters waiting for towers. It is not uncommon to spend upwards of $10,000 if buying all new gear. My last repeater that went online was a MTR3000 ($6500.00), Duplexer ($1800.00), 7/8" Hardline (175' @ 2.50'), DB408 - ($800.00), plus connectors, hangers, cable pulls, ground kits, ground wire. Yes we can all do this stuff for a lot less but it really depends on what you want out of the repeater. If you start your post with "Currently running on two Baofeng 5R with limited range" then its not a repeater that we should be putting in a database nor one that will benefit you or others. The goal is to have a repeater that is beneficial to the end user. Since I moved south I have 2 repeaters, antenna's and hard line. Neither are up yet as i want it to be worthwhile. One is waiting on a tower for my house and the other will be on a 400' tower if i can ever work out an agreement with the owners. "A repeater that is beneficial to the end user" can be quite limited in reach, if it covers a small, user-dense, area with no cellphone coverage, though. Low-altitude, low-power, and transportable systems can be extremely valuable. You just can't pretend you're going to blanket a whole ZIP code with two potatofengs. Understanding and evaluating your requirements is the first step in speccing out any system, be it radio, computer, or chemical plant, for that matter. Frankly, festivals and such are probably 30% of my use case, all of which can be covered by a truck mounted repeater without much trouble. (It helps that the fairgrounds slope away from the parking area, in my case - but again, understanding and evaluating requirements.) Mobile Repeaters can be done! WROC668, WRDE483 and WRWB993 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryb27 Posted March 27, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2019 "A repeater that is beneficial to the end user" can be quite limited in reach, if it covers a small, user-dense, area with no cellphone coverage, though. Low-altitude, low-power, and transportable systems can be extremely valuable. You just can't pretend you're going to blanket a whole ZIP code with two potatofengs. Understanding and evaluating your requirements is the first step in speccing out any system, be it radio, computer, or chemical plant, for that matter. Frankly, festivals and such are probably 30% of my use case, all of which can be covered by a truck mounted repeater without much trouble. (It helps that the fairgrounds slope away from the parking area, in my case - but again, understanding and evaluating requirements.) Mobile Repeaters can be done! That's not a mobile repeater in that pic, its a HAM operating HF. As far as a mobile repeater it really is a waste of time. I have done this already and it was a total disappointment.. Unless your car is at a substantial height advantage you will not have any better coverage then simplex. Again you can and will try to explain or reason away my logic without listening to what I and others have been trying to tell you. I have tried the mobile repeater, the setup was a 50W Motorola SLR 5700 with a 4 cavity BP/BR duplexer connected to a 5.5dB gain antenna on the top of my truck. After testing for about month I realized it had no practical use and only offered slightly more range than simplex, best part I ended up needing a jump after a day at the fair. Mind you this was a $2400 repeater, $800 duplexer with an antenna that was tuned using an Anritsu S331D. I promise I nor anybody on this site will try to steer you wrong, I hold a Commercial, Amateur and GMRS license, own and operate several large repeaters and have all the gear for building, testing and maintaining these kinds of systems. WRVL973, jimndfw, shawnvanhorn and 5 others 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimndfw Posted March 27, 2019 Report Share Posted March 27, 2019 Corey Great information. WRKU973 and coryb27 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted March 27, 2019 Report Share Posted March 27, 2019 Good post... Nice read to let new-comers know what the reality is. As far as "mobile repeaters" go... to do it right, its much more expensive and difficult than a fixed-station repeater, with nowhere near the performance advantage. I built a portable repeater system for a government emergency response team. It cost a bit over $16,500. The antenna alone was a massive project. It was on a 10' tall tripod (mast mount centered half way up) with a 30' fixed mast and a 30' crank extension, for a total of 65' of elevation. The equipment and batteries were extremely heavy and had to be installed in vented enclosures to keep them dry and cool. The repeater had to be trucked to a location and dropped at a high-point. Setting up the portable tower took a huge amount of labor and real estate to get it stood up and staked out so it was straight and wouldn't fall over in 20-30 mph winds. And unless you have a babysitter, you need self-contained GPS tracking and local alarm on the transceiver in the event that some knucklehead finds your repeater and decides to leave with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaine Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 I used to set up a trailer with 40 ft crank up tower, solar panels, and outriggers. We used it for oilfield PTP communications and also for MotoTRBO demos. All we needed was an S-10 pickup with a hitch ball to drag it around. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk RCM 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygeekboy Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 Wish I'd have read this post before I ran off 'half-cocked' *like I always do! JamesBrox, LeeBo and Logan5 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted October 22, 2019 Report Share Posted October 22, 2019 LoL I'm pretty sure we've all done it. andygeekboy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BKLIPP Posted October 29, 2019 Report Share Posted October 29, 2019 There is a local repeater in my area of Concord, North Carolina with a frequency of 462.700. I'm new and not sure as to hit the repeater. There is a CSQ of 146.2HZ. Do I need to program this in CTSS or what? Is this transmit or receive or both? I welcome any help. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan5 Posted October 29, 2019 Report Share Posted October 29, 2019 There is a local repeater in my area of Concord, North Carolina with a frequency of 462.700. I'm new and not sure as to hit the repeater. There is a CSQ of 146.2HZ. Do I need to program this in CTSS or what? Is this transmit or receive or both? I welcome any help. Thank you.yes, put the * tone in the TX location leave RX open or off. if you need further help please start your own thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayoverthere Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 Edit: moved content to its own post. https://forums.mygmrs.com/topic/1708-repurposing-for-a-repeater/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berkinet Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 I don’t really have any comments if the questions you have posed. However, I would suggest you might get more responses by starting your own topic for this discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoxCar Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 The equipment and possibly the land is probably owned by the licensee. Attempt to contact them about access to the site and tower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted July 1, 2020 Report Share Posted July 1, 2020 Yeah, of course it's tempting to rig up. I'm just starting in GMRS and HAM. When I was researching both I came across linking GMRS to the internet. That's the first project. I'm not licensed yet on HAM, but studying daily. Due to the pandemic there is no local in person testing. I know that preppers have worked hard in setting up canned repeaters, bug out kits and all. That's real cool use of the technology and looks like in a group talk setting it is the cat's pajamas. Often I wonder how useful it will be if there is a Red Dawn (crappy movie IMHO). I've talked with all sorts from bunkers to organic gardeners, and comms isn't the highest priority across that spectrum. For me it's a hobby, one that I won't pump tons of money into, though it looks like a ton of fun to build a fully equipped GMRS station. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lscott Posted July 1, 2020 Report Share Posted July 1, 2020 Good post... Nice read to let new-comers know what the reality is. As far as "mobile repeaters" go... to do it right, its much more expensive and difficult than a fixed-station repeater, with nowhere near the performance advantage. I built a portable repeater system for a government emergency response team. It cost a bit over $16,500. The antenna alone was a massive project. It was on a 10' tall tripod (mast mount centered half way up) with a 30' fixed mast and a 30' crank extension, for a total of 65' of elevation. The equipment and batteries were extremely heavy and had to be installed in vented enclosures to keep them dry and cool. The repeater had to be trucked to a location and dropped at a high-point. Setting up the portable tower took a huge amount of labor and real estate to get it stood up and staked out so it was straight and wouldn't fall over in 20-30 mph winds. And unless you have a babysitter, you need self-contained GPS tracking and local alarm on the transceiver in the event that some knucklehead finds your repeater and decides to leave with it.That all depends. I have a Ham buddy who built a special event repeater, for local marathons and bike runs, really cheap with some used radios and a good power amp. The way it was done is using cross-band repeating so the expensive cavity filters get ditched. Most Ham HT’s can be programmed to do split band operation. You RX on one frequency on one band, say VHF, and TX on another, UHF, when you press the PTT button. For Ham radio this usually ends up being the 2 meter and 70 cm bands. On the repeater side a simple diplexer is enough to work the VHF and UHF radios into and can be had for $50 to $75 new. Then he takes advantage of the local high rise buildings. Through his contacts he has access to the roof tops. No need for an expensive tower and feed line. When you’re on top of a 10 to 15+ story building you get some decent coverage. Since the repeater can be located close to the temporary antenna you don’t need expensive feed line. And what you do use is fairly short thus keeping the losses down and thus the TX’er power required. Granted his conditions are not the general case but if one looks around and takes advantage of the local resources you can save a huge amount of money and effort. However if one wants to build an in-band repeater, then yes it gets more complicated and likely expensive as you pointed out. maddogrecurve 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted July 1, 2020 Report Share Posted July 1, 2020 Not disagreeing there, but there are serious limits to crossband repeaters. They do have their place though. I have a complete X-Band repeater system that will work with any two bands, covering 10m, 6m, 2m and 70cm. Including antennas, a battery, diplexer, solar charger and the radio... it was about $700 for support of 50% duty cycle, 24x7. It is almost exclusively used for me, personally... not others. The model you discussed is known as ITDR, or Indirect Transmit / Direct Receive. An example of some problems you will experience with these types of solutions are limiting the users to only people you make aware of it (compared to known offsets for same-band), many times the repeater antenna is too close to the ground and other obstructions for any significant increase in coverage, and your receive is significantly hampered by the fact that you are listing direct on an HT. My gear supports ITDR and ITIR (Indirect Transmit / Indirect Receive). ITIR helps with both the ability to transmit and receive, but now significantly restricts who can use the repeater, normally being used/usable by a single operator to extend their TX/RX range. In general, they can be a great individual solution for Hams and (if planned in advance) be a marginal solution for a group of Hams with the correct / compatible gear, but not ideal for a true repeater service and definitely not legal in GMRS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lscott Posted July 1, 2020 Report Share Posted July 1, 2020 Not disagreeing there, but there are serious limits to crossband repeaters. They do have their place though. I have a complete X-Band repeater system that will work with any two bands, covering 10m, 6m, 2m and 70cm. Including antennas, a battery, diplexer, solar charger and the radio... it was about $700 for support of 50% duty cycle, 24x7. It is almost exclusively used for me, personally... not others. The model you discussed is known as ITDR, or Indirect Transmit / Direct Receive. An example of some problems you will experience with these types of solutions are limiting the users to only people you make aware of it (compared to known offsets for same-band), many times the repeater antenna is too close to the ground and other obstructions for any significant increase in coverage, and your receive is significantly hampered by the fact that you are listing direct on an HT. My gear supports ITDR and ITIR (Indirect Transmit / Indirect Receive). ITIR helps with both the ability to transmit and receive, but now significantly restricts who can use the repeater, normally being used/usable by a single operator to extend their TX/RX range. In general, they can be a great individual solution for Hams and (if planned in advance) be a marginal solution for a group of Hams with the correct / compatible gear, but not ideal for a true repeater service and definitely not legal in GMRS.I think his was a full cross band, duplex, design. The two radios are cross connected. He did his initial testing with the antenna on his tower. He is also the main radio tech for a local city’s transportation department. He done some tower climbing and repeater installs. Many of his comments are similar to yours.The one I remember most is a story where another tech went out to check the repeater equipment in the shack at the tower base. Opened the door only to discover a huge hornets nest inside. By the time help arrived he was passed out on the ground from all the stings. Luckily he survived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcspaz Posted July 1, 2020 Report Share Posted July 1, 2020 I think his was a full cross band, duplex, design. The two radios are cross connected. He did his initial testing with the antenna on his tower. He is also the main radio tech for a local city’s transportation department. He done some tower climbing and repeater installs. Many of his comments are similar to yours.The one I remember most is a story where another tech went out to check the repeater equipment in the shack at the tower base. Opened the door only to discover a huge hornets nest inside. By the time help arrived he was passed out on the ground from all the stings. Luckily he survived.Wow! That is terrible. Glad to hear h made it. The worst I came across was a Copperhead infested shack. Fortunately there was plenty of evidence outside, before we even opened the door, so we were able to get past control out before we did. I have been thinking about building a self-contained repeater system that you can connect to any two radio and turn them into a repeater. Its pretty easy to design. I did one back in the mid-80's. I'm just so busy, I dont have time for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lscott Posted July 2, 2020 Report Share Posted July 2, 2020 I’ve looked at those cheap repeater controllers. Those are the ones you connect two radios together using the mic/speaker jacks and key the other radio using VOX. The main complaint I have with using one for a quick throw together repeater is the lack of an ID function. I have looked at the “ID- O-Matic” which has it but you need a COR it seems to make the thing work, which of course an modified radio doesn’t provide. So that brought me back to the first option about hacking the hardware to add an ID function. The cheap controllers without the ID could be used in two cases. The first is a half-duplexer repeater, which has the limitations you pointed out previously, and used exclusively by the licensed user. The second is with GMRS, but only if qualified family members use it exclusively since everybody ID’s using the same call sign. All other cases the repeater needs to self ID. The strange thing is the one GMRS repeater by me, which I have the owners permission to use, along with a few friends, I have NEVER heard it ID yet. How the owner is getting away with it beats me other than the FCC doesn’t want to bother with it. It doesn’t get much use so unless you know it’s there you wouldn’t notice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.